journal article·2015-02

Photocatalytic activity of Ce-modified SBA-15 for the degradation of isoproturon

ANIL KUMAR REDDY POLICE, SRINIVAS BASAVARAJU, DURGAKUMARI VALLURI, SUBRAHMANYAM MACHIRAJU

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 38· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Cerium (Ce)-modified SBA-15 and Al-grafted SBA-15 are prepared and compared their photocatalytic activity for isoproturon degradation. The Al-SBA-15 is prepared by postsynthetic grafting method and cerium-modified samples are prepared by the impregnation technique. All the samples are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV–vis DRS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and N 2 adsorption/desorption analysis. The samples show well-ordered mesoporous structure and it is confirmed by XRD. The UV–vis DRS of Ce-modified sample shows a red shift compared to SBA-15 and the cerium species are stabilized in + 3 oxidation state at lower cerium contents. The presence of Ce3+ species is also substantiated by XPS analysis. The higher amount of Ce3+ species are accompanied by oxygen vacancies which are formed due to the contact of ceria with the support. The N2 adsorption/desorption analysis of the samples show type-IV isotherms characteristic of mesoporous materials. Photocatalytic activity evaluation studies are made on all the samples for the degradation of isoproturon. Among them, 0.3 (wt%) Ce-modified Al-SBA-15 catalyst has shown a maximum activity in comparison with Ce-modified SBA-15. The better activity is attributed to the synergistic effect of mesoporosity and the presence of Ce3+ species along with oxygen vacancies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Chong M N, Jin B, Chow C W K and Saint C 2010 Water Res. 44 299710.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039 ↗
2. Pelaez M, Nolan N T, Pillai S C, Seery M K, Falaras P, Kontos A G, Dunlop P S M, Hamilton J W J, Byrne J A, O’Shea K, Entezari M H and Dionysiou D D 2012 Appl. Catal. B 25 33110.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.036 ↗
3. Orlov A, Zhai Q Z and Klinowski J 2006 J. Mater. Sci. 41 218710.1007/s10853-006-7184-5 ↗
4. Sharma M V P, Durgakumari V and Subrahmanyam M 2008 Chemosphere 73 156210.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.081 ↗
5. Reddy J K, Lalitha K, Durgakumari V and Subrahmanyam M 2008 Catal. Lett. 121 13110.1007/s10562-007-9309-0 ↗
6. Mihai G D, Meynen V, Beyers E, Mertens M, Bilba N, Cool P and Vansant E F 2009 J. Porous Mater. 16 10910.1007/s10934-007-9174-7 ↗
7. Reddy J K, Srinivas B, Durgakumari V and Subrahmanyam M 2009a ChemCatChem 1 49210.1002/cctc.200900189 ↗
8. Reddy J K, Durgakumari V, Subrahmanyam M and Sreedhar B 2009b Mater. Res. Bull. 44 154010.1016/j.materresbull.2009.02.005 ↗
9. Sharma M V P, Durgakumari V and Subrahmanyam M 2010 J. Hazard. Mater. 175 110110.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.056 ↗
10. Anil Kumar Reddy P, Srinivas B, Pruthu K, Durgakumari V and Subrahmanyam M 2011 Mater. Res. Bull. 46 176610.1016/j.materresbull.2011.08.006 ↗
11. Anil Kumar Reddy P, Srinivas B, Durgakumari V and Subrahmanyam M 2012 Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 94 51210.1080/02772248.2011.654120 ↗
12. Li Y, Xia H, Fan F, Feng Z, Santen R A V, Hensen E J M and Li C 2008 Chem. Commun. 77410.1039/B717079C ↗
13. Lunawat P S, Kumar R and Gupta N M 2008 Catal. Lett. 121 22610.1007/s10562-007-9319-y ↗
14. Pradhan A C, Parida K M and Nand B 2011 Dalton Trans. 40 734810.1039/c1dt10363f ↗
15. Yuan Q, Duan H H, Li L L, Li Z X, Duan W T, Zhang L S, Song W G and Yan C H 2010 Adv. Mater. 22 147510.1002/adma.200904223 ↗
16. Sheng X, Zhou Y, Duan Y, Zhang Y and Xue M 2011 J. Porous Mater. 18 67710.1007/s10934-010-9426-9 ↗
17. Sheng X, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Duan Y and Xue M 2012 Catal. Lett. 142 36010.1007/s10562-012-0769-5 ↗
18. Pouretedal H R and Ahmadi M 2012 Int. Nano Lett. 2 110.1186/2228-5326-2-10 ↗
19. Kim H Y, Lee H M and Henkelman G 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 156010.1021/ja207510v ↗
20. Buitrago R, Martínez J R, Albero J S, Escribano A S and Reinoso F R 2012 Catal. Today 180 1910.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.032 ↗
21. Li K, Tang X, Yi H, Ning P, Kang D and Wang C 2012 Chem. Eng. J. 192 9910.1016/j.cej.2012.03.087 ↗
22. Zhao D, Feng J, Huo Q, Melosh N, Fredrickson G H, Chmelka B F and Stucky G D 1998 Science 279 54810.1126/science.279.5350.548 ↗
23. Mendoza A K M, Jácome M A C, Antonio J A T, Chávez C A, Salinas E L, López I C, Barrera M C, Escobar J, Navarrete J and Hernández I 2011 Appl. Catal. B 106 14
24. Lakshmi K, Thrimurthulu G, Reddy B M, Muhler M and Grűnert W 2011 Catal. Sci. Tech. 1 164510.1039/c1cy00312g ↗
25. Timofeeva M N, Jhung S H, Hwang Y K, Kim D K, Panchenko V N, Melgunov M S, Chesalov Y A and Chang J S 2007 Appl. Catal. A 317 110.1016/j.apcata.2006.07.014 ↗
26. Wenqing J, Hong W and Ganzuo L I 2011 Rare Metals 5 516
27. Beche E, Charvin P, Perarnau D, Abanades S and Flamant G 2008 Surf. Interface Anal. 40 26410.1002/sia.2686 ↗