journal article·2009-10

Role of particle size in visible light photocatalysis of Congo Red using TiO2·[ZnFe2O4] x nanocomposites

Himanshu Narayan, Hailemichael Alemu, Lebohang Macheli, Mantoa Sekota, Madhavi Thakurdesai, T. K. Gundu Rao

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 32· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

TiO2·[ZnFe2O4] x (x = 0·0-0·5) nanocomposites (NCs) with an average particle size of 72·4 nm were synthesized by the method of co-precipitation/hydrolysis (CPH). For the comparison of particle-size dependent effects, a set of polycrystalline samples with similar compositions was also prepared by solid state reaction (SSR) route. Average particle size for SSR prepared samples was about 3·0 µm. All the samples were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), particle size analyzer, Raman spectroscopy and Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy. Their visible light photocatalytic activity was tested for the degradation of Congo Red dye. Maximum photodegradation was observed for the NC with x = 0·1 synthesized by CPH (particle size, 71 nm). Similar composition prepared by SSR method (particle size, 6·19 µm) showed lower photoactivity in comparison even with that observed for pure TiO2 (particle size, 4·03 µm). It was, therefore, concluded that enhanced photodegradation is directly related to the reduced particle size of the composites, which implies that photosensitization is the process primarily involved. Although, doping of TiO2 with ZnFe2O4 does extend the cut-off wavelength towards visible parts of the spectrum, its contribution in the enhancement is not as significant as that due to the photosensitization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Pigment Synthesis and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Boulc’h F, Schouler M -C, Donnadieu P, Chaix J -M and Djurado E 2001 Image Anal. Stereol. 20 15710.5566/ias.v20.p157-161 ↗
2. Bumpas J A, Tricker J, Andrzejewski K, Rhoads H and Tatarko M 1999 J. Chem. Ed. 76 168010.1021/ed076p1680 ↗
3. Busani T and Devine R A B 2005 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20 870510.1088/0268-1242/20/8/043 ↗
4. Cheng P, Li W, Zhou T, Jin Y and Gu M 2004 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chemistry 168 9710.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.05.018 ↗
5. Dung N T, Khoa N V and Herrmann J M 2005 Int. J. Photoenergy 07 1110.1155/S1110662X05000024 ↗
6. Ghosh M and Raychaudhuri A K 2007 Nanotechnology 18 11561810.1088/0957-4484/18/11/115618 ↗
7. Habibi M H, Esfahani M N and Egerton T A 2007 Int. J. Photoenergy, Article ID 1365310.1155/2007/13653 ↗
8. Khan M A, Jung H -T and Yang O -B 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B110 662610.1021/jp057119k ↗
9. Li L, Chu Y and Liu Y 2007 Nanotechnology 18 10560310.1088/0957-4484/18/10/105603 ↗
10. Liu G -G, Zhang X -Z, Xu Y -J, Niu X -S, Zheng L -Q and Ding X -J 2004 Chemosphere 55 128710.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.01.035 ↗
11. Srinivasan S S, Wade J and Stefanakos E K 2006 J. Nanomater., Article ID 4571210.1155/JNM/2006/87326 ↗
12. Wade J 2005 An investigation of TiO 2-ZnFe 2 O 4 nanocomposites for visible light photocatalysis, M.Sc. Thesis, College of Engineering, University of South Florida, USA
13. Wahi R K, Yu W W, Liu Y, Mejia M L, Falkner J C, Nolte W and Colvin V L 2005 J. Mol. Catal. A: Chemical 242 4810.1016/j.molcata.2005.07.034 ↗
14. Yuan Z -H and Zhang L -D 2001 J. Mater. Chem. 11 126510.1039/b006994i ↗
15. Zhang W F, He Y L, Zhang M S, Yin Z and Chen Q 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33 91210.1088/0022-3727/33/8/305 ↗