journal article·2016-09

Effects of size on mass density and its influence on mechanical and thermal properties of ZrO2 nanoparticles in different structures

BOTAN JAWDAT ABDULLAH, QING JIANG, MUSTAFA SAEED OMAR

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of size on mass density and its subsequent influence on the other physical parameters of zirconia nanoparticles in the structural forms of cubic, tetragonal and monoclinic. The general equations for these calculations are established based on the variation of lattice parameter model and surface internal atoms ratio. The mass density of nanoparticles differs from the bulk value when particle size decreases. At a diameter of 4 nm, the mass density values of zirconia nanoparticles are 3.898, 3.626 and 3.488 g ⋅ cm−3 compared to 6.25, 6.1 and 5.87 g⋅ cm−3 for bulk cubic, tetragonal and monoclinic forms, respectively. These results indicate that the variation in mass density is largely due to the differences on their boundaries and the variation in lattice parameters. The calculated results agree well with the available experimental data for the monoclinic form structure of ZrO 2 nanoparticles. The relationship between mass density and melting temperature; and Debye temperature and cohesive energy are proposed. All these parameters have the same nanosize dependence in this regard.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Material Dynamics and Properties · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Dercz G, Prusik K and Pająk L 2008 JAMME 31 408
2. Porter D L, Evans A G and Heuer A H 1979 Acta Metall. 27 164910.1016/0001-6160(79)90046-4 ↗
3. Christensen A and Carter E A 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 805010.1103/PhysRevB.58.8050 ↗
4. Sahu R H and Ranga Rao G 2000 Bull. Mater. Sci. 23 34910.1007/BF02708383 ↗
5. Gleiter H 2000 Acta Mater. 48 110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00285-2 ↗
6. Sun C Q 2009 Prog. Mater. Sci. 54 17910.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.08.001 ↗
7. Hadjoub Z, Beldi I, Bouloudnine M, Gacem A and Doghmane A 1998 Electron. Lett. 34 31310.1049/el:19980189 ↗
8. Gacem A, Doghmane A and Hadjoub Z 2011 Adv. Mater. Res. 324 9310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.324.93 ↗
9. Qiao Z, Latz R and Mergel D 2004 Thin Solid Films 466 25010.1016/j.tsf.2004.02.094 ↗
10. Safaei A 2012 Nano 7 125000910.1142/S1793292012500099 ↗
11. Lovell S and Rollinson E 1968 Nature 218 117910.1038/2181179a0 ↗
12. Siegel J, Lyutakov O, Rybka V, Kolská Z and Švorčik V 2011 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 9610.1186/1556-276X-6-96 ↗
13. Kolská Z, Řiha J, Hnatowicz V and Švorčik V 2010 Mater. Lett. 64 116010.1016/j.matlet.2010.02.038 ↗
14. Opalinska A, Malka I, Dzwolak W, Chudoba T, Presz A and Lojkowski W 2015 J. Nanotechnol. 6 27
15. Nanda K K 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 330110.1016/j.physleta.2012.10.001 ↗
16. Fujii K, Tanaka M, Nezu Y, Nakayama K, Fujimoto H, De Bièvre P and Valkiers S 1999 Metrologia 36 45510.1088/0026-1394/36/5/7 ↗
17. Shen T D, Zhang J and Zhao Y 2008 Acta Mater. 56 366310.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.003 ↗
18. Qin W and Szpunar J A 2005 Phil. Mag. Lett. 85 64910.1080/09500830500474339 ↗
19. Zhu Y F, Zheng W T and Jiang Q 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 08311010.1063/1.3212858 ↗
20. Jiang Q, Liang L H and Zhao D S 2001 J. Phys. Chem. B 105 627510.1021/jp010995n ↗
21. Jiang Q, Shi H X and Zhao M 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 111 217610.1063/1.479489 ↗
22. Zhang Z, Li J C and Jiang Q 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33 265310.1088/0022-3727/33/20/318 ↗
23. Omar M S 2007 Mater. Res. Bull. 42 31910.1016/j.materresbull.2006.05.031 ↗
24. Omar M S 2012 Mater. Res. Bull. 47 351810.1016/j.materresbull.2012.06.067 ↗
25. Liang L H and Baowen L 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 15330310.1103/PhysRevB.73.153303 ↗
26. Sun C Q 2007 Prog. Solid State Chem. 35 110.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2006.03.001 ↗
27. Shandiz M A 2008 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 325237
28. Vanithakumari S C and Nanda K K 2008 Phys. Lett. A 372 693010.1016/j.physleta.2008.09.050 ↗
29. Yang C C and Jiang Q 2005 Acta Mater. 53 330510.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.039 ↗
30. Guisbiers G 2010 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5 113210.1007/s11671-010-9614-1 ↗
31. Banerjee R, Sperling E A, Thompson G B, Fraser H L, Bose S and Ayyub P 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 425010.1063/1.1582361 ↗
32. Gleiter H 1989 Prog. Mater. Sci. 33 22310.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
33. Chatterjee P P, Pabi S K and Manna I 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 86 591210.1063/1.371612 ↗
34. Liu X D, Zhang H Y, Lu K and Hu Z Q 1994 J. Appl. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6 L497
35. Chattopadhyay P P, Nambissan P M G, Pabi S K and Manna I 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 05410710.1103/PhysRevB.63.054107 ↗
36. Tjong S C and Chen H 2004 Mater. Sci. Eng. R 45 110.1016/j.mser.2004.07.001 ↗
37. Goff J P, Hayes W, Hull S, Hutchings M T and Clausen K N 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1420210.1103/PhysRevB.59.14202 ↗
38. Park J and Lakes R S 2007 Biomaterials: an introduction (New York, USA: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC) 3rd edn, p 145
39. Li S, Zheng W T and Jiang Q 2006 Scripta Mater. 54 209110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.03.002 ↗
40. Mirgorodsky A P, Smirnov M B and Quintard P E 1999 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 60 98510.1016/S0022-3697(99)00005-0 ↗
41. Yuren W, Kunquant L, Dazhi W, Zhonghua W and Zhengzhi F 1994 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6 633
42. Nevitt M V, Fang Y and Chan S -K 1990, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 250210.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb07619.x ↗
43. Ishii T, Wakita H, Ogasawara K and Kim Y-S (eds) 2015 The DV-Xa molecular-orbital calculation method (Switzerland: Springer International Publishing) p 18910.1007/978-3-319-11185-8 ↗
44. Wolten G A 1963 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 46 41810.1111/j.1151-2916.1963.tb11768.x ↗
45. Bouvier P, Djurado E, Lucazeau G and Bihan T L 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 873110.1103/PhysRevB.62.8731 ↗
46. Jiang Q, Liang L H and Zhao D S 2001 J. Phys. Chem. B 105 627510.1021/jp010995n ↗