journal article·2012-06

Effect of aligned carbon nanotubes on electrical conductivity behaviour in polycarbonate matrix

M M LARIJANI, E J KHAMSE, Z ASADOLLAHI, M ASADI

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

This article reports effects of alignment of embedded carbon nanotubes in a polycarbonate polymer matrix under magnetic, direct and alternating current electric fields on the electrical properties of the resulting nanocomposites. Composites consisting of different quantities of carbon nanotubes in a polycarbonate matrix have been prepared using a solution casting technique. The effects of field strength and nanotube concentration on the resulted network structure and conductivity of the composites were studied by in situ optical microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and four-point probe technique. The results showed that the composites prepared in the presence of field had better conductivity than those of as-prepared composites. It was also concluded that the application of alternating current electric field and magnetic field in this system led to the formation of relatively continuing networks while direct current electric field only prevented agglomeration of the carbon nanotubes in the polycarbonate matrix and created relatively uniform distribution of nanotubes in the matrix.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Conducting polymers and applications · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Camponeschi E, Vance R, Al-Haik M, Garmestani H and Tannenbaum R 2007 Carbon 45 203710.1016/j.carbon.2007.05.024 ↗
2. Chandra A, Kramschuster A J, Hu X and Turng L S 2007 Effect of injection molding parameters on the electrical conductivity of polycarbonate/carbon nanotube nanocomposites, Proc. of ANTEC, p. 2184
3. Harish M 2005 Processing and study of carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites and polymer electrolyte materials, PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
4. Heremans J, Olk C H and Morelli D T 1994 Phys. Rev. B49 1512210.1103/PhysRevB.49.15122 ↗
5. Jiang X, Bin Y and Matsau M 2005 Polymer 46 741810.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.127 ↗
6. Krause B, Pötschke P and Häubler L 2009 Compos. Sci. Technol. 69 150510.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.007 ↗
7. Kymakis E, Alexandou I and Amaratunga G A J 2002 Synth. Met. 127 5910.1016/S0379-6779(01)00592-6 ↗
8. Li W, Wang Q and Dai J 2006 Bull. Mater. Sci. 29 31310.1007/BF02706502 ↗
9. Lin B, Sundaraj U and Pötschke P 2006 Macromol. Mater. Eng. 291 22710.1002/mame.200500335 ↗
10. Ma C, Zhang W, Ji L, Zhang R, Koratkar N and Liang J 2008 Carbon 46 70610.1016/j.carbon.2008.01.019 ↗
11. Martin C A, Sandler J K W, Windle A H, Schwarz M K, Bauhofer W, Schulte K and Schaffer M S P 2005 Polymer 46 87710.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.081 ↗
12. Oliver A, Bult J, Le Q V, Mbaruku A L and Schwartz J 2008 Nanotechnology 19 50570210.1088/0957-4484/19/50/505702 ↗
13. Ou E C W et al 2009 Acs Nano 3 225810.1021/nn900406n ↗
14. Ounaies Z, Park C, Wise K E, Siochi E J and Harrison J S 2003 Compos. Sci. Technol. 63 163710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00067-8 ↗
15. Park C et al 2002 Chem. Phys. Lett. 364 30310.1016/S0009-2614(02)01326-X ↗
16. Park M, Kim H and Youngblood J P 2008 Nanotechnology 19 05570510.1088/0957-4484/19/05/055705 ↗
17. Pötschke P, Bhattacharyya A R, Janke A and Georing H 2003 Compos. Interf. 10 38910.1163/156855403771953650 ↗
18. Stauffer D and Aharony A 2003 Introduction to percolation theory (London: Taylor & Francis)10.4324/9780203211595 ↗
19. Steinert B W and Dean D R 2009 Polymer 50 89810.1016/j.polymer.2008.11.053 ↗
20. Takahashi T, Murayama T, Higuchi A, Awano H and Yonetake K 2006 Carbon 44 118010.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.055 ↗
21. Wang Q, Dai J, Li W, Wei Z and Jiang J 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 164410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.024 ↗