journal article·2000-02

Role of work hardening characteristics of matrix alloys in the strengthening of metal matrix composites

K. T. Kashyap, C. Ramachandra, C. Dutta, B. Chatterji

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 23· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The strengthening of particulate reinforced metal-matrix composites is associated with a high dislocation density in the matrix due to the difference in coefficient of thermal expansion between the reinforcement and the matrix. While this is valid, the role of work hardening characteristics of the matrix alloys in strengthening of these composites is addressed in the present paper. It is found that commercial purity aluminium which has the lowest work hardening rate exhibits the highest strength increment. This effect is due to increased prismatic punching of dislocations. This relationship of decreasing work hardening rate associated with increasing prismatic punching of dislocations in the order 7075, 2014, 7010, 2024, 6061 and commercial purity aluminium leading to increased strength increments is noted.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Arsenault R J and Fisher R M 1983Scr. Metall. 17 6710.1016/0036-9748(83)90072-8 ↗
2. Arsenault R J and Shi N 1986Mater. Sci. Eng. 81 17510.1016/0025-5416(86)90261-2 ↗
3. Arsenault R J, Wang L and Feng C K 1991Acta Metall. 39 4710.1016/0956-7151(91)90327-W ↗
4. Clyne T W and Withers P J 1993An introduction to metal matrix composites (UK: Cambridge University Press) p. 710.1017/CBO9780511623080 ↗
5. Marcus H L 1984 Microscopic study of the influence on interface bonding, Report no. UTSCMSE-84-1, University of Texas
6. Meyers M A and Chawla K K 1999Mechanical behaviour of materials (USA: Prentice Hall Inc.) p. 116
7. Nair S V, Tien J K and Bates R C 1985Int. Mater. Rev. 30 27510.1179/imr.1985.30.1.275 ↗
8. Vogelsang M, Fisher R M and Arsenault R J 1986Met. Trans. A17 37910.1007/BF02643944 ↗
9. Webster D 1982Met. Trans. A13 151110.1007/BF02642890 ↗