journal article·2004-02

X-ray diffraction line profile analysis for defect study in Zr-2.5% Nb material

K. Kapoor, D. Lahiri, S. V. R. Rao, T. Sanyal, B. P. Kashyap

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 27· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The microstructure characterization by X-ray line profile analysis is possible for determination of dislocation density, micro-strain within grains due to dislocation and average cohe rent domain size (sub- grain) within the grain. This study presents the X -ray diffraction peaks shape analysis and their broadening with different thermal treatments in Zr -2·5% Nb pressure tube material. The peak shape is analysed using Fourier transformation and information about coherent domain size, micro-strain and dislocation density could be obtained from the Fourier coefficients of the peak. Analysis of broadening of the peaks by integral breadth method also gives the coherent domain size, dislocation density and micro -strain present in the mate- rial. The results from the X-ray techniques are comparable to those obtained from direct observation of transmission electron microscopy. The measured yield strength increases with dislocation density. An empir i- cal relationship is obtained for the yield strength from the dislocation density of the material. The measured strength is in agreement with the one calculated from dislocation density.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Aqua E M and Owens CM 1967Trans. Met. Soc. AIME 239 155
2. Caglioti G, Paoletti A and Ricci F P 1958Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 3 22310.1016/0369-643X(58)90029-X ↗
3. Chatterjee S K and Sengupta S P 1974J. Mater. Sci. 9 95310.1007/BF00570389 ↗
4. Cheadle B A 1982Nucl. Technol. 57 23110.13182/NT82-A26307 ↗
5. Coleman C E and Hardie D 1966J.I.M. 94 387
6. Douglass D L 1963J. Nucl. Mater. 9 25210.1016/0022-3115(63)90143-0 ↗
7. Einarsson B 1972Information Processings 71 1346
8. Holt R A 1976J. Nucl. Mater. 59 23410.1016/0022-3115(76)90056-8 ↗
9. Keijser Th H, De Langford D I, Mittemeijer E J and Vogels A B P 1982J. Appl. Cryst. 15 30810.1107/S0021889882012035 ↗
10. Mukherjee P, Chattopadhyay S K, Chatterjee S K, Meikap A K, Barat P, Bandopadhyay S K, Sen P and Mitra M K 2000Met. Trans. A31 240510.1007/s11661-000-0185-0 ↗
11. Northwood D O, Bahen L E and London I 1975J. Nucl. Mater. 155 29910.1016/0022-3115(75)90071-9 ↗
12. Rama Rao P and Anantharaman T R 1963 Z.Metallk. 54 658
13. Sharp JV, Makin MJ and Christian J W 1965Phys. Status Solidi 11 84510.1002/pssb.19650110235 ↗
14. Srivastava D and Banerjee S B ARC Report 1992/1/011
15. Stokes A R 1948Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 61 38210.1088/0959-5309/61/4/311 ↗
16. Wilson A J C 1962Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 8 28610.1088/0370-1328/80/1/333 ↗
17. Warren B E 1968X-ray diffraction (Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley) p. 225
18. Wagner C N J and Aqua E N 1964Adv. X-ray Anal. 7 46