Nanorods over wettable and defect sights
Source abstract
Abstract
Study of wetting and nonwetting surfaces is very significant in various fields of science. Stability of self-assembled wettable layers over any surface is vital in that respect. The generation and then detection of defect sites on such surfaces is also ominously important. In this study, self-assembled monolayers of PFDTS (1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane) molecules on silicon-wafer have been created by vapour deposition method. Due to fluorinated tail of PFDTS molecule, the nature of surface will become hydrophobic. Such hydrophobic surface normally leaves no deposits, except at a single point over the surface. Defect sights on PFDTS region produces confined areas on the hydrophobic surface with different wettability. Such sights will facilitate narrowed deposition of nanoparticles within the hydrophobic defects. These fluidic deposits will facilitate nanoscale interactions and drying capillaries to play their role within such regions. Hydrophobic regions without defects show clean surface with no deposition of nanoparticles, whereas close-packed gold nanorods have been observed within the confined defect regions on PFDTS.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Murray W A and Barnes W L 2007 Adv. Mater. 19 377110.1002/adma.200700678 ↗
2. Pitarke J M, Silkin V M, Chulkov E V and Echenique P M 2007 Rep. Prog. Phys. 70 110.1088/0034-4885/70/1/R01 ↗
3. Kelly K L, Coronado E, Zhao L L and Schatz G C 2003 J. Phys. Chem. B 107 66810.1021/jp026731y ↗
4. Kooij E S and Poelsema B 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8 334910.1039/b518389h ↗
5. Huang X, El-Sayed I H, Qian W and El-Sayed M A 2006 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 211510.1021/ja057254a ↗
6. Durr N J, Larson T, Smith D K, Korgel B A, Sokolov K and Ben-Yakar A 2007 Nano Lett. 7 94110.1021/nl062962v ↗
7. Sönnichsen C and Alivisatos A P 2005 Nano Lett. 5 30110.1021/nl048089k ↗
8. Ahmed W, Kooij E S, van Silfhout A and Poelsema B 2010 Nanotechnology 21 12560510.1088/0957-4484/21/12/125605 ↗
9. Perez-Juste J, Pastoriza-Santos I, Liz-Marzan L M and Mulvaney P 2005 Coord. Chem. Rev. 249 187010.1016/j.ccr.2005.01.030 ↗
10. Imtiaz A, Harold J W Z and Kooij E S 2014 Langmuir 30 795310.1021/la500980j ↗
11. Waqqar A, Christian G, Stefan E K and Jan M van R 2014 Nanotechnology 25 03530110.1088/0957-4484/25/3/035301 ↗
12. Imtiaz A, Hidayatullah K, Rahim J and Sajjad A 2019 Mater. Res. Express 6 10500610.1088/2053-1591/ab3540 ↗
13. Imtiaz A, Hidayatullah K and Rahim J 2019 J. Nanomater. Mol. Nanotechnol. 8 3
14. Jana N R, Gearheart L and Murphy C J 2001 Langmuir 17 678210.1021/la0104323 ↗
15. Jana N R, Gearheart L and Murphy C J 2001 Adv. Mater. 13 138910.1002/1521-4095(200109)13:18<1389::AID-ADMA1389>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
16. Kim F, Song J H and Yang P 2002 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 1431610.1021/ja028110o ↗
17. Busbee B D, Obare S O and Murphy C J 2003 Adv. Mater. 15 41410.1002/adma.200390095 ↗
18. Nikoobakht B and El-Sayed M A 2003 Chem. Mater. 15 195710.1021/cm020732l ↗
19. Mi-Hee J and Hyoyoung L 2011 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 15910.1186/1556-276X-6-159 ↗