journal article·2026-07

Fire testing and failure mechanism of roof decking

Ankit Sharma, Evan Sluder, Ickchan Kim, Alexander B. Morgan, Mauro Zammarano

Journal of Fire Sciences· Volume 44· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigated the fire performance of roofing materials under controlled laboratory conditions, with a focus on the ignition mechanisms of roof decking and their implications for fire testing and material flammability. Mockup roof assemblies, comprising asphalt shingles, underlayment, and wooden decking, were tested at both bench and large scales. Large-scale testing employed a modified version of the ASTM E108 Burning Brand test, the standard used to classify the fire performance of roof coverings. Bench-scale evaluation was conducted using a cone calorimeter equipped with a specialized sample holder adapted from ASTM E3367 and designed to accommodate multilayer assemblies. This configuration (commonly referred to as the Cube test) was intended to replicate fire exposure conditions similar to those in ASTM E108. In both test configurations, flaming beneath the roof decking occurred without any apparent perforation, that is, without the formation of breaks or fissures in the roof assembly. Video analysis of the tests revealed that ignition on the underside of the specimens was initiated by intense smoldering, which eventually transitioned into flaming. This ignition mechanism, known as the smoldering-to-flaming transition, represents a fundamentally different failure mode from burn-through, in which flames penetrate through openings in the structure. This study experimentally demonstrated and mechanistically explained this transition as a possible cause of the long-standing reproducibility issues in ASTM E108. Underside flaming occurred only when airflow increased oxygen supply, with air velocity controlling the transition through competing effects of enhanced char oxidation/pyrolysis and convective cooling. These findings emphasize the need for detailed airflow characterization beneath roofing test assemblies for a reproducible and reliable assessment of roof assemblies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Fire effects on concrete materials · Engineering and Material Science Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fire Research Division, Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety, Richburg, SC, USA

Center for Flame Retardant Materials Science, University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH, USA

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. FEMA. Roofs-home builder’s guide to construction in wildfire zones https://defensiblespace.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/fema_p_737_fs_5.pdf (accessed 4 February 4 2025).
2. Reining S Wussow M Zanocco C et al. Roof renewal disparities widen the equity gap in residential wildfire protection. Nat Commun 2025; 16: 463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55705-w10.1038/s41467-024-55705-w ↗
3. CAL FIRE Ready for Wildfire. Wildfire home hardening guide. Prepare for wildfire https://readyforwildfire.org/prepare-for-wildfire/hardening-your-home/ (accessed 4 February 2025).
4. 10.3733/ucanr.839310.3733/ucanr.8393 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.10465010.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104650 ↗
6. UL Standards & Engagement. UL 790 UL Standard https://www.shopulstandards.com/ProductDetail.aspx?productId=UL790 (2022 accessed 20 April 2025).
7. ASTM International E05 Committee. ASTM E108-20 a standard test methods for fire tests of roof coverings. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0108-20A10.1520/E0108-20A ↗
8. RISE. Fire test according to CEN/TS 1187 test 2. https://www.ri.se/en/expertise-areas/services/fire-test-according-to-cents-1187-test-2 (accessed 10 August 2025).
9. Watts JM. ASTM E5 research review. Fire Technol 1987; 23: 342–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0104059210.1007/BF01040592 ↗
10. Fire concerns with roof-mounted solar panels https://www.sfpe.org/publications/fpemagazine/fpeextra/etarchives3/fpeetissue92 (accessed 26 February 2024).
11. IIBEC. Aged membrane fire testing; the single-ply roofing industry view https://iibec.org/publication-post/aged-membrane-fire-testing-the-single-ply-roofing-industry-view/ (2003 accessed 26 February 2024).
12. Engineering: Firefighter Training and Fire Service News Rescue. Construction concerns: roofing materials tests fire https://www.fireengineering.com/fire-prevention-protection/roofing-materials-tests/ (2014 accessed 26 February 2024).
13. UL Solutions. UL roof standard https://www.ul.com/news/underlying-truth-about-roofing-underlayments (accessed 20 February 2024).
14. Babrauskas V Mowrer F. Calibration problems with the ASTM E108 fire test. Fire Mater 2023; 47: 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.306810.1002/fam.3068 ↗
15. National Roofing Contractors Association. Fire testing of membrane roof systems https://nrca.net/roofingguidelines/Library/Detail?id=Q-sIHhxasR8%3D (accessed 5 February 2025).
16. Standard test method for determining the combustion behavior of layered assemblies using a cone calorimeter https://www.astm.org/e3367-23.html (accessed 6 February 2025).
17. The Freedonia Group. US asphalt shingles market research & forecast analysis 2024-2033 https://www.freedoniagroup.com/industry-study/asphalt-shingles-us (accessed 10 August 2025).
18. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety. Roof aging farm research skellogg https://ibhs.org/wind/roof-aging-farm/ (2018 accessed 20 April 2025).
19. International Residential Code (IRC). 2018 chapter 8 roof ceiling construction https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IRC2018/chapter-8-roof-ceiling-construction (accessed 10 August 2025).
20. Hedayati F Merhi A Morrison M. Reconstruction of wind field measurements: a machine learning approach https://web.aimgroupinternational.com/2023/icwe/papers/ICWE2023_AbstractSubmission-554_2023-01-30%2022_11_46.pdf (2023 accessed 12 May 2026).
21. Standohar-Alfano CD Estes H Johnston T et al. Reducing losses from wind-related natural perils: research at the IBHS research center. Front Built Environ 2017; 3: 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.0000910.3389/fbuil.2017.00009 ↗
22. Cleary TG Grosshandler WL Nyden MR et al. Signatures of smoldering/pyrolyzing fires for multi-element detector evaluation NIST. https://www.nist.gov/publications/signatures-smolderingpyrolyzing-fires-multi-element-detector-evaluation (1996 accessed 15 March 2026).
23. Peto R Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc Ser A 1972; 135: 185–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/234431710.2307/2344317 ↗
24. Kaplan EL Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/228186810.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 ↗
25. Welch BL. The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika 1938; 29: 350–362. https://doi.org/10.2307/233201010.1093/biomet/29.3-4.350 ↗
26. Welch BL. The generalisation of student’s problems when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 1947; 34: 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.2810.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 ↗
27. De Beer JA Alascio JA Stoliarov SI et al. Analysis of the thermal exposure and ignition propensity of a lignocellulosic building material subjected to a controlled deposition of glowing firebrands. Fire Saf J 2023; 135: 103720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2022.10372010.1016/j.firesaf.2022.103720 ↗
28. Santoso MA Christensen EG Yang J et al. Review of the transition from smouldering to flaming combustion in wildfires. Front Mech Eng 2019; 5: 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2019.0004910.3389/fmech.2019.00049 ↗
29. 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.3-56510.3801/IAFSS.FSS.3-565 ↗
30. Bilbao R Mastral JF Aldea ME et al. Experimental and theoretical study of the ignition and smoldering of wood including convective effects. Combust Flame 2001; 126: 1363–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00251-610.1016/S0010-2180(01)00251-6 ↗
31. Richter F Jervis FX Huang X et al. Effect of oxygen on the burning rate of wood. Combust Flame 2021; 234: 111591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.11159110.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111591 ↗
32. Rein G. Smouldering fires and natural fuels. In: Belcher CM (ed) Fire phenomena and the earth system. John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2013 pp. 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118529539.ch210.1002/9781118529539.ch2 ↗
33. Roberts AF. A review of kinetics data for the pyrolysis of wood and related substances. Combust Flame 1970; 14: 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(70)80037-210.1016/S0010-2180(70)80037-2 ↗
34. Di Blasi C. Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2008; 34: 47–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.00110.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001 ↗
35. Babrauskas V. Ignition of wood: a review of the state of the art. J Fire Prot Eng 2002; 12: 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391026062048210.1177/10423910260620482 ↗
36. Qin Y Zhang Y Chen Y et al. Minimum oxygen supply rate for smouldering propagation: effect of fuel bulk density and particle size. Combust Flame 2024; 261: 113292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.11329210.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113292 ↗
37. Wang S Huang X Chen H et al. Interaction between flaming and smouldering in hot-particle ignition of forest fuels and effects of moisture and wind. Int J Wildland Fire 2016; 26: 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF1609610.1071/WF16096 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10694-022-01339-710.1007/s10694-022-01339-7 ↗