Influence of graphene oxide on the mechanical, thermal and roughness of polyethersulphone
Source abstract
Abstract
Polyethersulphone (PES) is a prominent engineering plastic and its characteristics must be increased because of its promise functions in the aviation, vehicle industries and even sports fields. In this study, PES, and PES/graphene oxide (GO) composites are organized using extrusion blending methods. In this study, GO loading is suggested to increase PES composites’ mechanical characteristics, dimensional strength and cryogenic engineering applications. The dynamic mechanical analysis displays that the loss and storage modulus of composites successfully increase with the GO inclusion, suggesting that the GO loading causes a powerful interfacial contact among the PES structure. The optimum GO loading for developing overall composite mechanical efficiency is 0.5 wt%. It has been shown that GO inclusion improves the cryogenic mechanical characteristics. Besides, the cryogenic mechanical characteristics of PES and its composites at –70°C have been seen to be much superior to those at room temperature. The impact of GO loadings on the morphology and efficiency of the composites was studied by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Fei L, Yu L, Cheng B Q, Hong M X, Yang H, Guo X S et al 2015 J. Polym. 59 15510.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.067 ↗
2. Linlin D, Yuanming W, Yatao Z and Jindun L 2015 J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 355 43610.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.127 ↗
3. Sirus Z, Vahid V, Ali A Z, Masoud R, Zahra R and Mohsen K 2015 J. Water Process Eng. 7 28010.1016/j.jwpe.2015.07.005 ↗
4. Fei L, Yang H, Cheng B Q, Hong M X and Shao Y F 2016 J. Compos. Part A 89 4710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.016 ↗
5. Efosa I, Yaolin F, Ramamoorthy M, Kimberly L J and Vernon M 2016 J. Compos. Sci. 514 518
6. Sabet M and Soleimani H 2020 J. Polym. Sci. Series A 61 92210.1134/S0965545X20010095 ↗
7. Saeed E, Shahram M B, Hadi A, Mohammad P, Faranak A and Toraj M 2016 J. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. I09 647
8. Sen S D, Fei L, Hong M X, Yuan Q L, Ning H and Shao Y F 2016 J. Compos. Part B 99 40710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.023 ↗
9. Aditya S K, Lukka Y T, Arthanareeswaran G, Matsuura T and Ismail A F 2016 Chem. Eng. J. 286 52810.1016/j.cej.2015.10.091 ↗
10. Prince J A, Bhuvana S, Anbharasi V, Ayyanar N and Boodhoo K V K 2016 J. Water Res. 103 31110.1016/j.watres.2016.07.042 ↗
11. Safarpoura M, Vatanpour V and Khataee A 2016 J. Desalination 393 6510.1016/j.desal.2015.07.003 ↗
12. Sabet M, Soleimani H and Hosseini S 2020 J. Polym. Bull. 77 45910.1007/s00289-019-02759-2 ↗
13. Fei L, Cheng B Q, Yang H, Hong M X and Shao Y F u 2017 J. Carbon 119 339
14. Modi A, Verma S K and Bellare J 2017 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 504 8610.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.035 ↗
15. Modi A, Verma S K and Bellare J 2018 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 514 75010.1016/j.jcis.2017.12.044 ↗
16. Abdi G, Alizadeh A, Zinadini S and Moradi G 2018 J. Compos. Sci. 552 326
17. Sabet M, Soleimani H, Mohammadian E and Hosseini S 2020 J. Mater. Perform. Charact. 9 28410.1520/MPC20190256 ↗
18. Karim A A, Leaper S, Alberto M, Vijayaraghavan A, Fan X, Holmes S M et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 334 78910.1016/j.cej.2017.10.069 ↗
19. Bagheripour E, Moghadassia A R, Hosseini S M, Bruggen B V D and Parvizian F 2018 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 62 31110.1016/j.jiec.2018.01.009 ↗
20. Liu L, Yan F, Li M, Zhang M, Xiao L, Shang L et al 2018 J. Compos. Part A 114 41810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.004 ↗
21. Algamdi M S, Alsohaimi I H, Lawler J, Ali H M, Aldawsari A M and Hassan H M A 2019 J. Sep. Purif. Technol. 223 1710.1016/j.seppur.2019.04.057 ↗
22. Sabet M, Soleimani H, Mohammadian E and Hosseini S 2020 Iran. Polym. J. 29 1099
23. Wang X, Feng M, Liu Y, Deng H and Lu J 2019 J. Compos. Sci. 577 41
24. Kong S, Lim M Y, Shin H, Baik J H and Lee J C 2020 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 84 13110.1016/j.jiec.2019.12.028 ↗
25. Jafarian F, Bordbar A K, Razmjou A and Zare A 2020 J. Compos. Sci. 613 11843510.1016/j.memsci.2020.118435 ↗
26. Sabet M, Soleimani H, Hosseini S and Mohammadian E 2021 J. High Perform. Polym. 33 16510.1177/0954008320943929 ↗
27. Eduardo L S, Gonçalves J, Lemos H G, Venancio E C, Mierzwa J C, Souza J D S D et al 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 390 12461210.1016/j.cej.2020.124612 ↗
28. Ndlwana L, Motsa M M and Mamba B B 2020 Eur. Polym. J. 136 10988910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109889 ↗
29. Vatanpour V, Khadem S S M, Dehqan A, Naqshabandi M A A, Ganjali M R, Hassani S S et al 2021 J. Chemosphere 263 12789210.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127892 ↗
30. Sun X, Liu X and Li F 2021 J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 551 14943810.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149438 ↗
31. Sabet M, Soleimani H, Mohammadian E and Hosseini S 2021 J. Plast. Rubber Compos. 50 6110.1080/14658011.2020.1833557 ↗
32. Karimipour H, Shahbazi A and Vatanpour V 2021 J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 10484910.1016/j.jece.2020.104849 ↗