Molecular simulation study of CO2 adsorption in carbon slit pores at high temperature and pressure conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
This work contributes to the estimation of new and complementary density data for carbon dioxide (CO2) confined in carbon slit pores at different conditions. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations were employed to predict the CO2 adsorption capacities in carbon slit pores of height 20, 31.6, 63.2, 94.85 and 126.5 A at 673.15 and 873.15 K over a pressure range of 500–4000 kPa, which corresponds to steam reforming of methane process. The bulk densities of CO2 at these temperature and pressure conditions have been estimated via isothermal–isobaric ensemble MC simulations using the Elementary Physical Model. The predicted density shows an excellent agreement with the experimental data. The adsorption capacities of CO2 in all the aforementioned pores at 673.15 and 873.15 K over the pressure range of 500–4000 kPa have also been estimated in the presence of wall–fluid interactions, in addition to the fluid–fluid interactions. The study on the thermodynamic phase behaviour of confined CO2 in the presence of wall–fluid interactions showed the existence of vapour–liquid equilibria at high temperature and pressure conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks 1990–2014 Available: www.epa.gov accessed on 12 March 2020
2. Kohl A and Nielsen R 1997 Gas purification (USA: Gulf Professional Publishing)
3. Zhou Q, Koiwanit J, Piewkhaow L, Manuilova A, Chana C, Wilson M et al 2014 Energy Procedia 63 745210.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.782 ↗
4. Eimer D 2014 Gas treating: absorption theory and practice (United Kingdom: Wiley & Sons Ltd.)10.1002/9781118877746 ↗
5. Wu X, Yu Y, Qin Z and Zhang Z 2014 Energy Procedia 63 133910.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.143 ↗
6. Bonenfant D, Mimeault M and Hausler R 2007 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 896810.1021/ie070778u ↗
7. van Holst J, Versteeg G, Brilman D and Hogendoorn J 2009 Chem. Eng. Sci. 64 5910.1016/j.ces.2008.09.015 ↗
8. Øi L and Kvan S 2014 Energy Procedia 63 118610.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.128 ↗
9. Amanda A, Moral-Vico J, Markeb A, Busquets-Fite M, Komilis D, Puntes V et al 2017 Sci. Total Environ. 595 5110.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.229 ↗
10. Younas M, Sohail M, Leong L, Bashir M and Sumathi S 2016 Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13 183910.1007/s13762-016-1008-1 ↗
11. Murge P, Dinda S and Roy S 2019 Langmuir 35 1475110.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02259 ↗
12. Dinda S, Murge P and Chakravarthy B 2019 Bull. Mater. Sci. 42 24010.1007/s12034-019-1936-8 ↗
13. Murge P, Dinda S and Roy S 2018 Energy Fuels 32 1078610.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02411 ↗
14. Levesque D and Lamari F 2009 Mol. Phys. 107 59110.1080/00268970902905802 ↗
15. Tenney C and Lastoskie C 2006 Environ. Prog. 25 34310.1002/ep.10168 ↗
16. Heuchel M, Davies G, Buss E and Seaton N 1999 Langmuir 15 869510.1021/la9904298 ↗
17. Pantatosaki E, Psomadopoulos D, Steriotis T, Stubos A, Papaioannou A and Papadopoulos G 2004 Colloids Surf. A 241 12710.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.026 ↗
18. Samios S, Stubos A, Papadopoulos G, Kanellopoulos N and Rigas F 2000 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 224 27210.1006/jcis.1999.6683 ↗
19. Steriotis T, Papadopoulos G, Stubos A and Kanellopoulos N 2002 Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 144 54510.1016/S0167-2991(02)80179-3 ↗
20. Samios S, Papadopoulos G, Steriotis T and Stubos A 2001 Mol. Simul. 27 44110.1080/08927020108031362 ↗
21. Vishnyakov A, Ravikovitch P and Neimark A 1999 Langmuir 15 873610.1021/la990726c ↗
22. Shao X, Feng Z, Xue R, Ma C, Wang W, Peng X et al 2011 AIChE J. 57 304210.1002/aic.12515 ↗
23. Gu S, Gao B, Teng L, Li Y, Fan C, Iglauer S et al 2017 Energy Fuels 31 971710.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01344 ↗
24. Ravikovitch P, Vishnyakov A, Russo R and Neimark A 2000 Langmuir 16 231110.1021/la991011c ↗
25. Lithoxoos G, Peristeras L, Boulougouris G and Economou I 2012 Mol. Phys. 110 115310.1080/00268976.2012.659223 ↗
26. Kurniawan Y, Bhatia S and Rudolph V 2006 AIChE J. 52 95710.1002/aic.10687 ↗
27. Lim Y, Bhatia S, Nguyen T and Nicholson D 2010 J. Membr. Sci. 355 18610.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.030 ↗
28. Nakagawa K and Ohashi T 1998 J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 134410.1149/1.1838462 ↗
29. Seggiani M, Puccini M and Vitolo S 2013 Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 17 2510.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.009 ↗
30. Balbuena P and Gubbins K 1992 Fluid Phase Equilibr. 76 2110.1016/0378-3812(92)85075-J ↗
31. Frenkel D and Smit B 1996 (2) Understanding molecular simulation from algorithms to applications (San Diego: Academic Press)
32. Harris J and Yung K 1995 J. Phys. Chem. 99 1202110.1021/j100031a034 ↗
33. Steele W 1973 Surf. Sci. 36 31710.1016/0039-6028(73)90264-1 ↗
34. Lastoskie C, Gubbins K and Quirke N 1993 Langmuir 9 269310.1021/la00034a032 ↗
35. Singh S, Saha A and Singh J 2010 J. Phys. Chem. B 114 428310.1021/jp9109942 ↗
36. Martin M 2013 Mol. Simul. 39 121210.1080/08927022.2013.828208 ↗
37. Span R and Wagner W 1996 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 25 150910.1063/1.555991 ↗
38. Shing-Cheng C, Shih-Yao C, Chieh-Li C and Cha’o-Kuang C 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 331 22510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.084 ↗
39. Sengupta A and Adhikari J 2016 J. Mol. Liq. 221 118410.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.100 ↗
40. Snook I and Megen W 1980 J. Chem. Phys. 72 290710.1063/1.439489 ↗
41. Snook I and Megen W 1981 J. Chem. Phys. 74 140910.1063/1.441205 ↗
42. Sengupta A, Behera P and Adhikari J 2014 Mol. Phys. 112 196910.1080/00268976.2013.877166 ↗