Designing miniaturized metamaterial absorber with tunable multiband characteristics for THz applications
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, a novel tunable metamaterial absorber having multiple bands is presented for solving sensing-related issues in THz applications. Initially, a zigzag shaped metamaterial absorber with multiband response is reported and then, a tunable absorber is proposed to cover a wide THz spectrum. The proposed tunable absorber has six ‘V’ shaped stubs with graphene at the edges to realize six absorption bands of 0.65, 1, 1.33, 1.45, 1.74 and 1.95 THz. The tuning of absorption bands is realized by varying the chemical potential of graphene by controlling the electrostatic gating and hence, provides tunable absorption characteristics in the optical regime. The absorber is designed with a polyimide substrate having a unit cell dimension of 0.14 × 0.14 λo, which is smaller when compared to similar literature. The simulation result shows a better absorption rate of > 90% over most of the operating bands. The influence of material on the absorption peak is analysed by using different types of conductors and dielectric materials.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Antenna Design and Analysis · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu Z, Liu J, Zeng Y and Ma J 2020 IEEE Internet Things J. 7 337810.1109/JIOT.2020.2968153 ↗
2. Yu H, Ng B and Winston K G 2017 IEEE Internet Things J. 4 221710.1109/JIOT.2017.2751524 ↗
3. Zhong M 2020 IET Optoelectron. 14 38610.1049/iet-opt.2020.0086 ↗
4. Saadeldin A S, Hameed M F O and Elkaramany E M A 2019 IEEE Sensors J. 19 799310.1109/JSEN.2019.2918214 ↗
5. Mishra R, Panwar R and Singh D 2018 IEEE Magn. Lett. 9 110.1109/LMAG.2018.2878946 ↗
6. Nejat M and Nozhat N 2019 IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 18 68410.1109/TNANO.2019.2925964 ↗
7. Barzegar-Parizi S and Khavasi A 2019 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 55 110.1109/JQE.2019.2901992 ↗
8. Gu M, Xiao B and Xiao S 2018 Nano Lett. 13 631
9. Fardoost A, Vanani F G and Amirhosseini A 2017 IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 16 68
10. Torabi E S, Fallahi A and Yahaghi A 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 146410.1109/TAP.2016.2647580 ↗
11. Su H-E, Li J-L and Xia L 2019 IEEE Access 18 16125510.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950729 ↗
12. Dong Y, Liu P, Yu D, Li G and Yang L 2017 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 16 111510.1109/LAWP.2016.2623316 ↗
13. Yuan J, Luo J and Zhang M 2018 IEEE Photon. J. 10 1
14. Yao G, Ling F and Yue J 2016 IEEE Photon. J. 1 1
15. Zarrabi F B, Bazgir M and Hekmati R 2019 IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 31 77910.1109/LPT.2019.2907651 ↗