TiO2–ZnO nanocomposites: synthesis, linear and nonlinear optical analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
TiO2–ZnO binary heterojunctions with different molar ratios of TiO2 to ZnO have been prepared via a two-step co-precipitation method, including the synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and then incorporating them into the ZnO matrix. Structural studies and elemental analysis have been carried out by a series of characterization techniques including X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer. The linear optical characteristics have been investigated using photoluminescence emission spectra at an excitation wavelength of 300 nm to estimate various energy states formed in crystalline structures. The optical nonlinearities of synthesized NPs have been tested by nanosecond laser pulse-based single-beam Z-scan technique. Closed-aperture and open-aperture Z-scan measurements have shown negative lens effects and reverse saturable absorption behaviours for as-synthesized composite nanostructures, respectively. The third-order susceptibilities of TiO2–ZnO nanocomposites have been estimated to be higher than that of pristine TiO2 NPs with a maximum value of 4.8 × 10−4 esu belonging to the sample with a 1:1 molar ratio of TiO2 to ZnO.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Long H, Chen A, Yang G, Li Y and Lu P 2009 Thin Solid Films 517 560110.1016/j.tsf.2009.01.133 ↗
2. Ramya E, Rajashree C, Nayak P and Rao D N 2017 Appl. Clay Sci. 150 32310.1016/j.clay.2017.10.001 ↗
3. Liao H, Xiao R, Wang H, Wong K and Wong G 1998 Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 181710.1063/1.121193 ↗
4. Guo L-H, Wang Y-W, Jiang Y-Q, Xiao S and He J 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 07780310.1088/0256-307X/34/7/077803 ↗
5. Saalinraj S and Ajithprasad K 2017 Mater. Today: Proc. 4 437210.1016/j.matpr.2017.04.008 ↗
6. Hashimoto T, Yoko T and Sakka S 1994 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 67 65310.1246/bcsj.67.653 ↗
7. Yuwono A H, Xue J, Wang J, Elim H I and Ji W 2006 J. Electroceram. 16 43110.1007/s10832-006-9893-1 ↗
8. Gayvoronsky V, Galas A, Shepelyavyy E, Dittrich T, Timoshenko V Y, Nepijko S et al 2005 Appl. Phys. B 80 9710.1007/s00340-004-1676-2 ↗
9. Li Y, Sung C, Inguva R and Bowden C M 1989 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6 81410.1364/JOSAB.6.000814 ↗
10. Tong Q, Wang Y-H, Yu X-X, Wang B, Liang Z, Tang M et al 2018 Nanotechnology 29 16570610.1088/1361-6528/aaac13 ↗
11. Rao A S, Sethuraman G, Ghosh O S N, Viswanath A K and Sharan A 2016 NLS-25 Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
12. Rocha-Mendoza I, Camacho-López S, Luna-Palacios Y Y, Esqueda-Barrón Y, Camacho-López M A, Camacho-López M et al 2018 Opt. Laser Technol. 99 11810.1016/j.optlastec.2017.08.021 ↗
13. Valligatla S, Chiasera A, Varas S, Das P, Bhaktha B S, Łukowiak A et al 2015 Opt. Mater. 50 22910.1016/j.optmat.2015.10.032 ↗
14. Xie J, Hao Y, Li M, Lian Y and Bian L 2017 World J. Eng. 14 27910.1108/WJE-08-2016-0066 ↗
15. Irimpan L, Krishnan B, Nampoori V and Radhakrishnan P 2008 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 324 9910.1016/j.jcis.2008.04.056 ↗
16. Han Y-B, Han J-B and Hao Z-H 2011 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11 502410.1166/jnn.2011.4152 ↗
17. Hosseini M, Haghighatzadeh A and Mazinani B 2019 Opt. Mater. 92 110.1016/j.optmat.2019.03.042 ↗
18. Kanmani S and Ramachandran K 2012 Renew. Energy 43 14910.1016/j.renene.2011.12.014 ↗
19. Gholami M, Shirzad-Siboni M, Farzadkia M and Yang J-K 2016 Desalin. Water Treat. 57 1363210.1080/19443994.2015.1060541 ↗
20. Batvandi M, Haghighatzadeh A and Mazinani B 2020 Appl. Phys. A 126 110.1007/s00339-020-03761-6 ↗
21. Haghighatzadeh A, Hosseini M, Mazinani B and Shokouhimehr M 2019 Mater. Res. Express 6 11506010.1088/2053-1591/ab49c4 ↗
22. Chen L-C, Tsai S-F, Chen J-H and Wang G-W 2013 Int. J. Photoenergy 2013 1
23. Chen L C, Chen J H, Tsai S F and Wang G W 2014 Appl. Mech. Mater. 479 69
24. Ganeshraja A S, Rajkumar K, Zhu K, Li X, Thirumurugan S, Xu W et al 2016 RSC Adv. 6 7279110.1039/C6RA13212J ↗
25. Klimov V I 2003 Semiconductor and metal nanocrystals: synthesis and electronic and optical properties. (New York, USA: CRC Press) p 285
26. Rakkesh R A and Balakumar S 2013 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 13 37010.1166/jnn.2013.6730 ↗
27. Zhang L and Jaroniec M 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 430 210.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.192 ↗
28. Sharifimehr M R, Ayoubi K and Mohajerani E 2015 Opt. Mater. 49 14710.1016/j.optmat.2015.09.009 ↗
29. Sheik-Bahae M, Said A A, Wei T-H, Hagan D J and Van Stryland E 2003 SPIE Milestone Series 174 292
30. Ganeev R, Baba M, Morita M, Rau D, Fujii H, Ryasnyansky A et al 2004 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6 44710.1088/1464-4258/6/4/024 ↗
31. Feng W, Wei T, Li-Na M, Wen-Ju C, Gui-Lan Z, Guo-Feng Z et al 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 146110.1088/0256-307X/25/4/080 ↗
32. Kole A K, Kumbhakar P and Chatterjee U 2014 Chem. Phys. Lett. 591 9310.1016/j.cplett.2013.11.016 ↗
33. He J, Qu Y, Li H, Mi J and Ji W 2005 Opt. Express 13 923510.1364/OPEX.13.009235 ↗
34. Irimpan L, Nampoori V and Radhakrishnan P 2010 Sci. Adv. Mater. 2 11710.1166/sam.2010.1083 ↗
35. Deepika, Dhar R and Mohan D 2015 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 29 155020910.1142/S0217984915502097 ↗
36. Ramya E, Rao M V, Jyothi L and Rao D N 2018 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 18 707210.1166/jnn.2018.15521 ↗
37. Abrinaei F and Shirazi M 2017 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 28 17541
38. Shaik U P, Kumar P A, Krishna M G and Rao S V 2014 Mater. Res. Express 1 04620110.1088/2053-1591/1/4/046201 ↗
39. Torres-Torres D, Trejo-Valdez M, Castañeda L, Torres-Torres C, Tamayo-Rivera L, Fernández-Hernández R et al 2010 Opt. Express 18 1640610.1364/OE.18.016406 ↗