Enhanced electrical, mechanical and thermal properties of chemically modified graphene-reinforced polybenzimidazole nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Chemically modified graphene-reinforced polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanocomposites were prepared by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) in methanesulphonic acid (CH4O3S), followed by in-situ polymerization using GO–CH4O3S and rGO–CH4O3S suspensions as reaction media. Various reducing agents were used to produce rGOs and their reducing efficiency was examined to attain highly graphitic structure and excellent electrical conductivity of the resulting rGOs. The results of Raman, Fourier transform infrared and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicate higher extent of reduction of GO with hydrazine compared to other reducing agents. The PBI nanocomposite containing 10 wt% rGO derived from hydrazine reduction reaction (rGO–H) exhibits the highest dc conductivity of 2.77 × 10−3 S cm−1 at room temperature, which is 11 orders of magnitude higher than pure PBI. The thermal annealing treatment at 350°C resulted in a substantial increase in dc conductivity of the PBI/GO nanocomposite, whereas the enhancement of conductivity is much less for the PBI/rGO nanocomposites. Compared to pure PBI, both tensile strength and Young’s modulus enhanced by 3.4 times and 6.9 times, respectively, for the PBI nanocomposites with 10 wt% GO content, which is ascribed to strong interfacial interactions and subsequent effective stress transfer between the PBI matrix and GO. The PBI/rGO nanocomposites exhibited relatively lower tensile strength/modulus compared to the GO-reinforced nanocomposite. The thermal stability of PBI was significantly improved upon the incorporation of both GO and rGO nanosheets, whereas higher thermal stability was achieved for rGO-reinforced nanocomposites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Anand S and Muthusamy A 2017 J. Mol. Struct. 1148 25410.1016/j.molstruc.2017.07.040 ↗
2. Subianto S 2014 Polym. Int. 63 113410.1002/pi.4708 ↗
3. Aharoni S M and Signorelli A J 1979 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 23 265310.1002/app.1979.070230910 ↗
4. Pohl H A and Chartoff R P 1964 J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 2 2787
5. Wu Q X, Pan Z F and An L 2018 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 89 16810.1016/j.rser.2018.03.024 ↗
6. Zarrin H, Jiang G, Lam G Y Y, Fowler M and Chen Z 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 1840510.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.134 ↗
7. Jahangiri S, Aravi İ, Şanli L I, Menceloğlu Y Z and Özden-Yenigün E 2018 Polym. Adv. Technol. 29 59410.1002/pat.4169 ↗
8. Jang J K, Kim T H, Yoon S J, Lee J Y, Lee J C and Hong Y T 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 1434210.1039/C6TA05080H ↗
9. Jones D J and Roziere J 2001 J. Membr. Sci. 185 4110.1016/S0376-7388(00)00633-5 ↗
10. Yu S and Benicewicz B C 2009 Macromolecules 42 864010.1021/ma9015664 ↗
11. Shao H, Shi Z, Fang J and Yin J 2009 Polymer 50 598710.1016/j.polymer.2009.10.044 ↗
12. Park J and Jeong Y G 2015 Polymer 59 10210.1016/j.polymer.2015.01.003 ↗
13. Cai Y, Yue Z, Teng X and Xua S 2018 Eur. Polym. J. 103 20710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.02.020 ↗
14. Ahmad M W, Dey B, Sarkhel G, Bag D S and Choudhury A 2019 Mater. Chem. Phys. 223 42610.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.026 ↗
15. Zhang L, Ni Q Q, Shiga A, Natsuki T and Fu Y 2011 Polym. Eng. Sci. 51 152510.1002/pen.21618 ↗
16. Geim A K and Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 18310.1038/nmat1849 ↗
17. Li D and Kaner R B 2008 Science 320 117010.1126/science.1158180 ↗
18. Thostenson E T, Li C and Chou T W 2005 Compos. Sci. Technol. 65 49110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 ↗
19. Idowu A, Boesl B and Agarwal A 2018 Carbon 135 5210.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.024 ↗
20. Ji X, Xu Y, Zhang W, Cui L and Liu J 2016 Compos. Part A 87 2910.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.011 ↗
21. Araby S, Meng Q, Zhang L, Kang H, Majewski P, Tang Y et al 2014 Polymer 55 20110.1016/j.polymer.2013.11.032 ↗
22. Mittal G, Dhand V, Rhee K Y, Park S J and Lee W R 2015 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21 1110.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 ↗
23. Tripathi S N, Rao G S S, Mathur A B and Jasra R 2017 RSC Adv. 7 2361510.1039/C6RA28392F ↗
24. Ferreira F V, Brito F S, Franceschi W, Simonetti E A N, Cividanes L S, Chipara M et al 2018 Surf. Interfaces 10 10010.1016/j.surfin.2017.12.004 ↗
25. Layek R K and Nandi A K 2013 Polymer 54 508710.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.027 ↗
26. Punetha V D, Rana S, Yoo H J, Chaurasia A, McLeskey Jr J T, Ramasamy M S et al 2017 Prog. Polym. Sci. 67 110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.010 ↗
27. Kuila T, Bose S, Mishra A K, Khanra P, Kim N H and Lee J H 2012 Prog. Mater. Sci. 57 106110.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.002 ↗
28. Papageorgiou D G, Kinloch I A and Young R J 2015 Carbon 95 46010.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.055 ↗
29. Lv J, Zhang G, Zhang H and Yang F 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 352 76510.1016/j.cej.2018.07.088 ↗
30. Li F, Qu C B, Hua Y, Xiao H M and Fu S Y 2017 Carbon 119 33910.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.056 ↗
31. Zhang M, Yan H, Yuan L and Liu C 2016 RSC Adv. 6 3888710.1039/C6RA01053A ↗
32. Woodward R T, Markoulidis F, Luca F D, Anthony D B, Malko D, McDonald T O et al 2018 J. Mater. Chem. A 6 184010.1039/C7TA09893F ↗
33. Alexandre M and Dubois P 2000 Mater. Sci. Eng. R 28 110.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7 ↗
34. Tang Q, Zhou Z and Chen Z 2013 Nanoscale 5 454110.1039/c3nr33218g ↗
35. Wang Y, Chen L, Yu J, Zhu J, Shi Z and Hu Z 2013 RSC Adv. 3 1225510.1039/c3ra40889b ↗
36. Wang Y, Shi Z, Fang J, Xu H and Yin J 2011 Carbon 49 119910.1016/j.carbon.2010.11.036 ↗
37. Hu Z, Li N, Li J, Zhang C, Song Y, Li X et al 2015 Polymer 7 1410.1016/j.polymer.2015.09.013 ↗
38. Choudhury A 2014 RSC Adv. 8 885610.1039/c3ra46908e ↗
39. Botsa S M and Basavaiah K 2019 Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 4 110.1007/s41204-018-0045-z ↗
40. Mohan B S, Ravi K, Balaji R A, Sree G S and Basavaiah K 2019 Physica B 553 19010.1016/j.physb.2018.10.033 ↗
41. Balaji R A, Mohan B S, Naidu G P and Muralikrishna R 2019 Physica E 108 10510.1016/j.physe.2018.12.007 ↗
42. Hummers W S and Offeman R E 1958 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 133910.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
43. Gao X, Jang J and Nagase S 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 83210.1021/jp909284g ↗
44. Ferrari A C and Robertson J 2000 Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 61 1409510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095 ↗
45. Guo Y, Sun X, Liu Y, Wang W, Qiu H and Gao J 2012 Carbon 50 251310.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.074 ↗
46. Tuinstra F and Koenig J L 1970 J. Chem. Phys. 53 112610.1063/1.1674108 ↗
47. Yin J and Elsenbaumer R L 2005 J. Org. Chem. 70 943610.1021/jo051515h ↗
48. Conti F, Majerus A, Noto V D, Korte C, Lehnert W and Stolten D 2012 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 1002210.1039/c2cp40553a ↗
49. Quartarone E, Magistris A, Mustarelli P, Grandi S, Carollo A, Zukowska G Z et al 2009 Fuel Cells 9 34910.1002/fuce.200800149 ↗
50. Tang Z, Lei Y, Guo B, Zhang L and Jia D 2012 Polymer 53 67310.1016/j.polymer.2011.11.056 ↗
51. Zhang H B, Zheng W G, Yan Q, Yang Y, Wang J W, Lu Z H et al 2010 Polymer 51 119110.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.027 ↗
52. Chen Y, Zhuang Q, Liu X, Liu J, Lin S and Han Z 2013 Nanotechnology 24 24570210.1088/0957-4484/24/24/245702 ↗
53. Park J H, Choudhury A, Farmer B L, Dang T D and Park S Y 2012 Polymer 53 393710.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.006 ↗
54. Dey B, Ahmad M W, Almezeni A, Sarkhel G, Bag D S and Choudhury A 2020 Compos. Commun. 17 8710.1016/j.coco.2019.11.012 ↗
55. Fukumaru T, Fujigaya T and Nakashima N 2013 Macromolecules 46 403410.1021/ma4004117 ↗
56. Zhou D, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Yu J and Hu Z 2019 Carbon 148 29710.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.089 ↗
57. Zhou C, Wang S, Zhuang Q and Han Z 2008 Carbon 46 123210.1016/j.carbon.2008.05.005 ↗
58. Jeong Y G, Baik D H, Jang J W, Min B G and Yoon K H 2014 Macromol. Res. 22 27910.1007/s13233-014-2043-8 ↗