Joining of tubular steel–steel by unconventional magnetic pulse force: environmentally friendly technology
Source abstract
Abstract
Electromagnetic welding uses environment-friendly, unconventional non-contacting magnetic pulse force for joining of two metals. The present paper focuses on the welding of tubular mild steel to two different steel bars, ferrite-pearlite 1018 carbon steel and austenite 304 stainless steel using a 40 kJ electromagnetic instrument. A qualitative metallurgical bonding was obtained for a selected set of optimum process parameters. The bonded region did not show localized melting for a mild steel–carbon steel joint and was found to be homogeneous liquid state bonding for a mild steel–stainless steel joint within a restricted distance of $$3~\upmu \hbox {m}$$ from the interface. Both the joints indicated good peel strength and leak tightness. Simulation studies were validated using experimental parameters such as voltage, current, impact velocity, magnetic flux and displacement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Shanthala K and Sreenivasa T N 2016 Front. Mech. Eng. 11 36310.1007/s11465-016-0375-0 ↗
2. Kapil A and Sharma A 2015 J. Cleaner Prod. 100 3510.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.042 ↗
3. Shanthala K, Sreenivasa T N, Choudhury H, Dond S and Sharma A 2018 J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 32 172510.1007/s12206-018-0328-0 ↗
4. Shribman V 2008 Magnetic pulse welding for dissimilar and similar materials, 3rd International conference on high speed forming – 2008 (ICHSF 2008) in Dortmund
5. Marya M and Marya S 2004 Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 9 54110.1179/174329304X8685 ↗
6. Aizawa T, Kashani M and Okagawa K 2007 Weld. Joint 86 119
7. Kore S D, Imbert J, Worswick M J and Zhou Y 2009 Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 14 54910.1179/136217109X449201 ↗
8. Marya M, Marya S and Priem D 2005 Weld. World 49 7410.1007/BF03263412 ↗
9. Stern A and Aizenshtein M 2002 Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 7 33910.1179/136217102225002673 ↗
10. Ghosh P, Patra S, Chattterjee S and Shome M 2018 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 254 2510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.012 ↗
11. Kacar R and Acarer M 2003 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 363 29010.1016/S0921-5093(03)00643-9 ↗
12. Kacar R and Acarer M 2004 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 152 9110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.012 ↗
13. Ehsan Z and Liaghat G 2012 J. Mater. Sci. 47 68510.1007/s10853-011-5841-9 ↗
14. Kumar S, Kulkarni M R, Saroj P C, Mittal K C and Gantayet L M 2013 Metallurgical and mechanical testing of electromagnetically welded copper and iron sample Asia Pacific conference on non-distructive testing (14th APCNDT) Mumbai, India, November 18–22 (APCNDT 2013)