journal article·2019-08

A comparative study of potential energy curves with RKRV curves for the ground states of I2, F2 and CO molecules

Hewa Y Abdullah

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The latest molecular constant potential energy curves used for the electronic ground states of I2, F2 and CO molecules are constructed by the Rydberg–Klein–Rees–Vanderslice (RKRV) method. The Morse, Rydberg, Hulbert–Hirschfelder and extended Rydberg potential functions compare each other and have good agreement with RKRV curves for these molecules. The percentage deviations from RKRV curves are drawn at the same abscissa scale. These curves show that the extended Rydberg potential energy curve deviation is $$< 0.5{-}2\%$$ error to dissociation limit.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions · Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Herzberg G 1989 Spectra of diatomic molecules, 2nd edn (Malbar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company)
2. Goodisman J 1973 Diatomic potential function, vols I & II (New York: Polytechnical Institute of Brooklyn)
3. Morse P M 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 5710.1103/PhysRev.34.57 ↗
4. Vijayanand K, Gaikwad S and Chaudhari A 2010 Bull. Mater. Sci. 33 23310.1007/s12034-010-0036-6 ↗
5. Rydberg R 1931 Z. Phys. 73 37610.1007/BF01341146 ↗
6. Varshni Y P 1937 Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 66410.1103/RevModPhys.29.664 ↗
7. Lipponcott E R 1953 J. Chem. Phys. 21 207010.1063/1.1698744 ↗
8. Hulbert H M and Hirschfelder J O 1941 J. Chem. Phys. 9 6110.1063/1.1750827 ↗
9. Ashmore J G and Tellinghuisen J 1986 J. Mol. Spectrosc. 119 6810.1016/0022-2852(86)90202-X ↗
10. Bytautas L, Matsunaga N, Nagata T, Gordon M S and Ruedenberg K 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 28 127
11. Huber K P and Herzberg G 1979 Constants of diatomic molecules (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company)10.1007/978-1-4757-0961-2_2 ↗
12. Farrenque R, Guelacsvili G, Sauval A J, Greverse N and Farmer C B 1991 J. Mol. Spectrosc. 149 37510.1016/0022-2852(91)90293-J ↗
13. Rydberg R 1933 Z. Phys. 80 51410.1007/BF02057312 ↗
14. Klein O 1932 Z. Phys. 76 22610.1007/BF01341814 ↗
15. Rees A L G 1947 Proc. Phys. Soc. 59 99810.1088/0959-5309/59/6/310 ↗
16. Abdullah H Y 2017 Can. J. Phys. 95 112210.1139/cjp-2017-0155 ↗
17. Vanderslice J T, Meson E A, Maisch W G and Lippincott E R 1960 J. Chem. Phys. 33 61410.1063/1.1731200 ↗
18. Vanderslice J T, Meson E A, Maisch W G, Lippincott E R J. Mol. Spectrosc. 3 17, 1959 and 5 83, 196010.1016/0022-2852(59)90003-7 ↗
19. de Juan C J and Martinez E 1983 J. Chem., Edu. 60 291
20. Murrell J N and Sorbie K S 1974 Faraday Tranjections 70 1152
21. Huxely P and Murrell J N 1983 J. Chem. Soc. Faraday 7A part 2 32310.1039/f29837900323 ↗
22. Bhartiya J B and Behere S H 1989 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 42 16310.1016/0022-4073(89)90099-X ↗
23. Dimitreva I K and Zenevich V A 1983 Chem. Phys. Lett. 96 22810.1016/0009-2614(83)80496-5 ↗
24. Birajdar S V 2001 Comparative studies in diatomic molecular potential energy functions (PhD thesis, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, MS, India)
25. Londhe C T, Mhaske N H and Behere S H 2013 Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Appl. Sci. 3 1