journal article·2022-10-15Open access

Influence of compressive strain on the hydrogen storage capabilities of graphene: a density functional theory study

Vikram Mahamiya, Alok Shukla, Nandini Garg, Brahmananda Chakraborty

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 4

Abstract

Pristine graphene is not suitable for hydrogen storage at ambient conditions since it binds the hydrogen molecules only by van der Waals interactions. However, the adsorption energy of the hydrogen molecules can be improved by doping or decorating metal atoms on the graphene monolayer. The doping and decoration processes are challenging due to the oxygen interference in hydrogen adsorption and the clustering issue of metal atoms. To improve the hydrogen adsorption energy in pristine graphene, we have explored the hydrogen storage capabilities of graphene monolayer in the presence of compressive strain. We found that at 6 % of biaxial compressive strain, a 4*4*1 supercell of graphene can adsorb 10 H$_2$ molecules above the graphene surface. The average binding energy of H$_2$ for this configuration is found to be -0.42 eV/H$_2$, which is very suitable for reversible hydrogen adsorption. We propose that a 4*4*1 supercell of graphene can adsorb a total number of 20 H$_2$ molecules leading to a high hydrogen uptake of 9.4 %. The interaction between orbitals of carbon and hydrogen atoms and the charge transfer process have been studied by plotting the partial density of states and surface charge density plots. The electronic density around the C-C bonds of graphene increases in the presence of compressive strain, due to which hydrogen molecules are strongly adsorbed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Graphene research and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang J, Sudik A, Wolverton C and Siegel D J 2010 Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 65610.1039/B802882F ↗
2. Sinigaglia T, Lewiski F, Santos Martins M E and Mairesse Siluk J C 2017 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42 2459710.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.063 ↗
3. Mazloomi K and Gomes C 2012 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 302410.1016/j.rser.2012.02.028 ↗
4. Patel S, Patel P, Chodvadiya D, Som N N and Jha P K 2022 J. Mol. Liq. 352 11870210.1016/j.molliq.2022.118702 ↗
5. Upadhyay D, Roondhe B, Pratap A and Jha P K 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 476 19810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.057 ↗
6. Xia Y, Yang Z and Zhu Y 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 936510.1039/c3ta10583k ↗
7. DOE technical system targets for onboard hydrogen storage for light-duty fuel cell vehicles. Available: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-onboard-hydrogen-storage-light-duty-vehicles (accessed on 20 April 2022)
8. Wijayanti I D, Denys R, Suwarno Volodin A A, Lototskyy M V, Guzik M N et al 2020 J Alloys Compd 828 15435410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154354 ↗
9. Singh A K, Singh A K and Srivastava O N 1995 J. Alloys Compd. 227 63–6810.1016/0925-8388(95)01625-2 ↗
10. Volodin A A, Denys R V, Bin W C, Wijayanti I D, Suwarno T B P et al 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 793 56410.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.134 ↗
11. Ma M, Duan R, Ouyang L, Zhu X, Chen Z, Peng C et al 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 691 92910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.307 ↗
12. Jorge A M, Prokofiev E, Ferreira De Lima G, Rauch E, Veron M, Botta W J et al 2013 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 830610.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.158 ↗
13. Yu X B, Wu Z, Xia B J and Xu N X 2004 J. Alloys Compd. 372 27210.1016/j.jallcom.2003.09.153 ↗
14. Zhang Y, Sun H, Zhang W, Yuan Z, Wei X, Gao J et al 2021 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46 2871910.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.127 ↗
15. Edalati K, Uehiro R, Ikeda Y, Li H W, Emami H, Filinchuk Y et al 2018 Acta Mater. 149 8810.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.033 ↗
16. Kleperis J, Lesnicenoks P, Grinberga L, Chikvaidze G and Klavins J 2013 Latv. J. Phys. Tech. Sci. 50 59
17. Li X, Yang X, Xue H, Pang H and Xu Q 2020 Energy Chem. 2 10002710.1016/j.enchem.2020.100027 ↗
18. Gangu K K, Maddila S, Mukkamala S B and Jonnalagadda S B 2019 J. Energy Chem. 0 13210.1016/j.jechem.2018.04.012 ↗
19. Srinivasan S, Demirocak D E, Kaushik A, Sharma M, Chaudhary G R, Hickman N et al 2020 Appl. Sci. 10 461810.3390/app10134618 ↗
20. Chen X, Yuan F, Gu Q and Yu X 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 1170510.1039/c3ta11940h ↗
21. Yildirim O and Derkus B 2020 J. Mater. Sci. 55 303410.1007/s10853-019-04254-5 ↗
22. He H, Chen X, Zou W and Li R 2018 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 43 282310.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.068 ↗
23. Vaidyanathan A, Wagh V, Sekhar C and Chakraborty B 2021 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46 14520–1453110.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.175 ↗
24. Gehringer D, Dengg T, Popov M N and Holec D 2020J Carbon Res. 6 1610.3390/c6010016 ↗
25. Cazorla C, Shevlin S A and Guo Z X 2010 Phys. Rev. B-Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 82 110.1103/PhysRevB.82.155454 ↗
26. Tozzini V and Pellegrini V 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 8010.1039/C2CP42538F ↗
27. Xu B, Lei X L, Liu G, Wu M S and Ouyang C Y 2014 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39 1710410.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.182 ↗
28. Guo Y, Lan X, Cao J, Xu B, Xia Y, Yin J et al 2013 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 398710.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.064 ↗
29. Sun Q, Jena P, Wang Q and Marquez M 2006 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 974110.1021/ja058330c ↗
30. Zhang Y and Cheng X 2018 Chem. Phys. 505 2610.1016/j.chemphys.2018.03.010 ↗
31. Mahamiya V, Shukla A and Chakraborty B 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 897 16279710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162797 ↗
32. Mahamiya V, Shukla A, Garg N and Chakraborty B 2022 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47 787010.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.112 ↗
33. Mahamiya V, Shukla A and Chakraborty B 2022 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.216 (in press)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.216 ↗
34. Chakraborty B, Ray P, Garg N and Banerjee S 2021 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46 415410.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.161 ↗
35. Mahamiya V, Shukla A and Chakraborty B 2022 Appl. Surf. Sci. 573 15138910.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151389 ↗
36. Sun Q, Wang Q, Jena P and Kawazoe Y 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 1458210.1021/ja0550125 ↗
37. Sigal A, Rojas M I and Leiva E P M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.158701 ↗
38. Lamari F D and Levesque D 2011 Carbon N. Y. 49 519610.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.036 ↗
39. Da Wu C, Fang T H and Lo J Y 2012 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37 1421110.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.040 ↗
40. Wang L, Stuckert N R and Yang R T 2011 AIChE J. 57 290210.1002/aic.12470 ↗
41. Perdew J P, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
42. Kresse G and Furthmiiller B J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
43. Kresse G and Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 16910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
44. Kresse G and Hafner J 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 25110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
45. Kresse G and Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
46. Grimme S 2006 J. Comput. Chem. 27 178710.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
47. Cabria I, López M J and Alonso J A 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 20472110.1063/1.2125727 ↗
48. Costanzo F, Silvestrelli P L and Ancilotto F 2012 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8 128810.1021/ct300143a ↗
49. Mauron P, Buchter F, Friedrichs O, Remhof A, Bielmann M, Zwicky C N et al 2008 J. Phys. Chem. B 112 90610.1021/jp077572r ↗
50. Faye O and Szpunar J A 2018 J. Phys. Chem. C 122 2850610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09498 ↗