journal article·2022-06

Investigation of visible light photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes by MoS2 nanosheets synthesized by different routes

Anjali Rani, Kulvinder Singh, Prianka Sharma

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, we have synthesized MoS2 nanosheets (NSs) through hydrothermal as well as liquid-phase sonication methods and studied their ability to degrade organic dyes, methyl red (MR) and methylene blue (MB) under visible light irradiation. The as-synthesized photocatalysts have been characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, Raman Spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy to confirm their structure and surface morphology. XRD patterns show that crystalline nature of MoS2 NSs prepared by hydrothermal method appears at 160°C for 15 h. In contrast, sharp and intense diffraction peaks appear for liquid exfoliation method even at room temperature, exhibiting better crystallinity of the as-prepared NSs. The difference (∆) of ~25 cm−1 between E12g and A1g modes of Raman spectra indicates formation of 5–6 layers of MoS2 from both the synthesis routes. UV–Vis spectroscopy has been utilized to study the degradation of dyes by MoS2 NSs as catalyst. Hydrothermally assisted synthesis of MoS2 NSs exhibit lesser degradation efficiency with 58.92% for MR and 49.28% for MB, while exfoliation-assisted MoS2 NSs act as better photocatalyst with 63.40 and 62.40% degradation of MR and MB, respectively. Faster degradation rate for MR compared to MB has been attributed to the presence of lesser chromophoric sites in MR.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Sharma M, Mohapatra P K and Bahadur D 2017 Front. Mater. Sci. 11 36610.1007/s11706-017-0404-x ↗
2. Zhu S and Wang D 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 170084110.1002/aenm.201700841 ↗
3. Xu C, Ravi Anusuyadevi P, Aymonier C, Luque R and Marre S 2019 Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 386810.1039/C9CS00102F ↗
4. Altintas Yildirim O, Arslan H and Sönmezoğlu S 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 390 11110.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.069 ↗
5. Vattikuti S V P and Byon C 2016 Superlattices Microstruct. 100 51410.1016/j.spmi.2016.10.012 ↗
6. Tab A, Bellal B, Belabed C, Dahmane M and Trari M 2020 Optik (Stuttg). 214 16485810.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164858 ↗
7. Malligavathy M, Iyyapushpam S, Nishanthi S T and Padiyan D P 2018 Pramana–J. Phys. 90 110.1007/s12043-018-1533-1 ↗
8. Rani A, Singh K, Patel A S, Chakraborti A, Kumar S, Ghosh K et al 2020 Chem. Phys. Lett. 738 13687410.1016/j.cplett.2019.136874 ↗
9. Sumesh C K and Parekh K 2019 Pramana–J. Phys. 92 8710.1007/s12043-019-1760-0 ↗
10. Mishra A K, Lakshmi K V and Huang L 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 1571810.1038/srep15718 ↗
11. Quinn M D J, Ho N H and Notley S M 2013 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5 1275110.1021/am404161k ↗
12. Johari P and Shenoy V B 2012 ACS Nano 6 544910.1021/nn301320r ↗
13. Li Z, Meng X and Zhang Z 2018 J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 35 3910.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.12.002 ↗
14. Li M, Wang D, Li J, Pan Z, Ma H, Jiang Y et al 2016 RSC Adv. 6 7153410.1039/C6RA16084K ↗
15. Paul K K, Sreekanth N, Biroju R K, Narayanan T N and Giri P K 2018 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 185 36410.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.056 ↗
16. Chhowalla M, Shin H S, Eda G, Li L-J, Loh K P and Zhang H 2013 Nat. Chem. 5 26310.1038/nchem.1589 ↗
17. Prabukumar C, Mohamed Jaffer Sadiq M, Krishna Bhat D and Udaya Bhat K 2019 Res. Express 6 08552610.1088/2053-1591/ab2200 ↗
18. Ding Q, Czech K J, Zhao Y, Zhai J, Hamers R J, Wright J C et al 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 1273410.1021/acsami.7b01262 ↗
19. Ntakadzeni M, Anku W W, Kumar N, Govender P P and Reddy L 2019 Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal. 14 14210.9767/bcrec.14.1.2258.142-152 ↗
20. Luo L, Shi M, Zhao S, Tan W, Lin X, Wang H et al 2019 J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 23 76210.1016/j.jscs.2019.01.005 ↗
21. Ho W, Yu J C, Lin J, Yu J and Li P 2004 Langmuir 20 586510.1021/la049838g ↗
22. Hou S X, Wu C and Huo Y J 2017 Ceram. - Silikaty 61 15810.13168/cs.2017.0011 ↗
23. Huang Q, Liu X, Chen Z, Gong S and Huang H 2019 Chem. Phys. Lett. 730 60810.1016/j.cplett.2019.06.061 ↗
24. Chaudhary N, Khanuja M, Abid and Islam S S 2018 Sens. Actuator. A: Phys. 277 19010.1016/j.sna.2018.05.008 ↗
25. Luo S, Dong S, Lu C, Yu C, Ou Y, Luo L et al 2018 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 513 38910.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.044 ↗
26. Sabarinathan M, Harish S, Archana J, Navaneethan M, Ikeda H and Hayakawa Y 2017 RSC Adv. 7 2475410.1039/C7RA03633G ↗
27. Chen M, Dai Y, Wang J, Wang Q, Wang Y, Cheng X et al 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 696 90010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.077 ↗
28. Kaur M, Umar A, Mehta S K and Kansal S K 2019 Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 245 14310.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.042 ↗
29. Peng Y, Meng Z, Zhong C, Lu J, Yu W, Jia Y B et al 2001 Chem. Lett. 30 77210.1246/cl.2001.772 ↗
30. Nguyen T P, Sohn W, Oh J H, Jang H W and Kim S Y 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 1007810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01838 ↗
31. Mukherjee S, Maiti R, Midya A, Das S and Ray S K 2015 ACS Photonics 2 76010.1021/acsphotonics.5b00111 ↗
32. Tian Y, He Y and Zhu Y 2004 Mater. Chem. Phys. 87 8710.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.05.010 ↗
33. Singh R, Barman P B and Sharma D 2017 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 28 570510.1007/s10854-016-6242-2 ↗
34. Eda G, Yamaguchi H, Voiry D, Fujita T, Chen M and Chhowalla M 2011 Nano Lett. 11 511110.1021/nl201874w ↗
35. Lee C, Yan H, Brus L E, Heinz T F, Hone J and Ryu S 2010 ACS Nano 4 269510.1021/nn1003937 ↗