journal article·2016-02

Effects of surfactants on size and structure of amylose nanoparticles prepared by precipitation

YAN DONG, YANJIAO CHANG, QIAN WANG, JIN TONG, JIANG ZHOU

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The present work investigated the influence of surfactants on size and structure of amylose nanoparticles (ANPs) prepared through precipitation. ANPs were fabricated using absolute ethanol containing surfactants (Tween80, Span80 and mixtures of Tween80 and Span80 with ratios of 25/75, 50/50 and 75/25, respectively) as non-solvents. The obtained ANPs were characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The results showed that surfactant type, concentration and hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) value had great impact on size of precipitated ANPs. The smallest ANPs with mean size of 155 nm determined by DLS were obtained by using 0.5% (in proportion of the amylose solution volume) of Tween80/Span80 mixture (HLB = 12.33). The precipitated ANPs possessed the V-type crystalline structure no matter whether using the surfactants or not.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Food composition and properties · Proteins in Food Systems · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Le Corre D, Bras J and Dufresne A 2010 Biomacromolecules 11 113910.1021/bm901428y ↗
2. Le Corre D and Angellier-Coussy H 2014 React. Funct. Polym. 85 9710.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.020 ↗
3. Kim H Y, Park S S and Lim S T 2015 Colloid Surf. B 126 60710.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.011 ↗
4. Angellier H, Choisnard L, Molina-Boisseau S, Dole P and Dufresne A 2004 Biomacromolecules 5 154510.1021/bm049914u ↗
5. Kim H Y, Park D J, Kim J Y and Lim S T 2013 Carbohydr. Polym. 98 29510.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.085 ↗
6. Ma X F, Jian R J, Chang P R and Yu J G 2008 Biomacromolecules 9 331410.1021/bm800987c ↗
7. Tan Y, Xu K, Li L L, Liu C, Song C L and Wang P X 2009 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1 95610.1021/am900054f ↗
8. Chin S F, Pang S C and Tay S H 2011 Carbohydr. Polym. 86 181710.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.012 ↗
9. Kim J Y, Yoon Y W and Lim S T 2009 Carbohydr. Polym. 78 62610.1016/j.carbpol.2009.05.026 ↗
10. Haaj S B, Magnin A, Petrier C and Boufi S 2013 Carbohydr. Polym. 92 162510.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.022 ↗
11. Zhang Z, Shan H L, Sun J R, Weng Y, Wang X, Xiong J and Chen X S 2013 RSC Adv. 3 1340610.1039/c3ra41610k ↗
12. Sun Q J, Li G H, Dai L, Ji N and Xiong L 2014 Food Chem. 162 22310.1016/j.foodchem.2014.04.068 ↗
13. Schubert S, Delaney J T and Schubert U S 2011 Soft Matter 7 158110.1039/C0SM00862A ↗
14. Dong Y, Chang Y J, Wang Q, Tong J and Zhou J 2015 Starch/Stärke 67 36510.1002/star.201400182 ↗
15. Cooremana F L, van Rensburg H and Delcoura J A 1995 J. Cereal Sci. 22 25110.1006/jcrs.1995.0061 ↗
16. Chamberlain E K and Rao M A 1999 Carbohydr. Polym. 40 25110.1016/S0144-8617(99)00060-0 ↗
17. Hebeish A, Ei-Rafie M H, El-Sheikh M and Ei-Naggar M E 2014 J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 24 51510.1007/s10904-013-0004-x ↗
18. Manchun S, Dass C R and Sriamornsak P 2014 Carbohydr. Polym. 101 65010.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.049 ↗
19. Pérez S and Bertoft E 2010 Starch/Stärke 62 38910.1002/star.201000013 ↗
20. Putseys J A, Lamberts L and Delcour J A 2010 J. Cereal Sci. 51 23810.1016/j.jcs.2010.01.011 ↗
21. Famá L, Goyanes S and Gerschenson L 2007 Carbohydr. Polym. 70 26510.1016/j.carbpol.2007.04.003 ↗