Effect of gamma radiation on electrical and optical properties of (TeO2)0·9 (In2O3)0·1 thin films
Source abstract
Abstract
We have studied in detail the gamma radiation induced changes in the electrical properties of the (TeO2)0·9 (In2O3)0·1 thin films of different thicknesses, prepared by thermal evaporation in vacuum. The current–voltage characteristics for the as-deposited and exposed thin films were analysed to obtain current versus dose plots at different applied voltages. These plots clearly show that the current increases quite linearly with the radiation dose over a wide range and that the range of doses is higher for the thicker films. Beyond certain dose (a quantity dependent on the film thickness), however, the current has been observed to decrease. In order to understand the dose dependence of the current, we analysed the optical absorption spectra for the as-deposited and exposed thin films to obtain the dose dependences of the optical bandgap and energy width of band tails of the localized states. The increase of the current with the gamma radiation dose may be attributed partly to the healing effect and partly to the lowering of the optical bandgap. Attempts are on to understand the decrease in the current at higher doses. Employing dose dependence of the current, some real-time gamma radiation dosimeters have been prepared, which have been found to possess sensitivity in the range 5–55 μGy/μA/cm2. These values are far superior to any presently available real-time gamma radiation dosimeter.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Arshak K and Korostynska O 2002 Sensors 2 34710.3390/s20800347 ↗
2. Arshak K and Korostynska O 2003a IEEE Proc., Circuits Devices Syst. 150 36110.1049/ip-cds:20030664 ↗
3. Arshak K and Korostynska O 2003b Sensor Rev. 23 4810.1108/02602280310457965 ↗
4. Arshak K and Korostynska O 2006 Mater. Sci. Eng. B133 110.1016/j.mseb.2006.06.012 ↗
5. Arshak K, Arshak A, Zleetni S and Korostynska O 2004 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-51 225010.1109/TNS.2004.834718 ↗
6. Arshak K, Korostynska O, Molly J and Harris J 2006 IEEE Sens. J. 6 65610.1109/JSEN.2006.874016 ↗
7. Atanassova E, Pasksleva A, Konakova R, Spassov D and Mitin V F 2001 Microelectron. J. 32 55310.1016/S0026-2692(01)00043-X ↗
8. Clough R L 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B185 810.1016/S0168-583X(01)00966-1 ↗
9. Colby E, Lum G, Plettner T and Spencer J 2002 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-49 285710.1109/TNS.2002.806019 ↗
10. Deng Q, Yin Z and Zhu R 1999 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A438 41510.1016/S0168-9002(99)00835-9 ↗
11. Horowitz Y S 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B184 6810.1016/S0168-583X(01)00712-1 ↗
12. Ibrahim A M and Soliman L I 1998 Rad. Phys. Chem. 53 46910.1016/S0969-806X(98)00016-4 ↗
13. Kumar G A, Maity T K, Kumar A and Sharma S L 2006 Int. conf. on advances in materials and materials processing, ICAMMP-2006 (Kharagpur: IIT) p. 913
14. Maity T K and Sharma S L 2008 Bull. Mater. Sci. 31 84110.1007/s12034-008-0134-x ↗
15. Mott N F 1969 Philos. Mag. 19 19
16. Mott N F and Davis E 1979 Electronic processes in non-crystalline materials (United Kingdom: Clarendon Press)
17. Sharma S L, Maity T K and Kumar G A 2008 IEEE-NSS Conf. Record N02-281 1066
18. Urbach F 1953 Phys. Rev. 92 132410.1103/PhysRev.92.1324 ↗
19. Zaykin Y A and Aliyev B A 2002 Rad. Phys. Chem. 63 22710.1016/S0969-806X(01)00583-7 ↗