journal article·2011-10

Study of energy bands and magnetic properties of Co2CrSi Heusler alloy

DIBYA PRAKASH RAI, SANDEEP, M P GHIMIRE, R K THAPA

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 34· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The electronic and magnetic properties of Co2CrSi is calculated by using full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (FP–LAPW) method based on density functional theory (DFT). Density of states (DOS), magnetic moment and band structures of the system are presented. For the exchange and correlation energy, local spin density approximation (LSDA+U) with the inclusion of Hubbard potential U is used. Our calculation shows indirect bandgap of 0·91 eV in the minority channel of DOS. This is supported by band structures and hence favoured the half metallic ferromagnetic (HMF) nature of the system. The effective magnetic moment of 4·006 μB also supported our conclusion with a near integral value. The DOS of Co and Cr were found to hybridize and was also responsible for the ferromagnetic nature of the system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Anisimov V I, Aryasetiawan F and Lichtenstein A I 1997 J. Phys.: Condens Matter 9 76710.1088/0953-8984/9/4/002 ↗
2. Blaha P, Schwarz K, Madsen G K H, Kvasnicka D, Luitz J and Schwarz K 2008 An augmented plane wave plus local orbitals program for calculating crystal properties, Wien2K user’s guide (Wien: Tech Universitat Wien)
3. de Boeck, van Roy W, Das J, Motsnyi V, Liu Z, Lagae L, Boeve H, Dessein K and Borghs G 2002 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17 34210.1088/0268-1242/17/4/307 ↗
4. de Groot R A, Mueller F M, van Engen P G and Buschow K H 1983 J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 202410.1103/PhysRevLett.50.2024 ↗
5. Galanakis I, Dederichs P H and Papanikolaou N 2002 Phys. Rev. B66 17442910.1103/PhysRevB.66.174429 ↗
6. Ghimire M P, Sandeep and Thapa R K 2010 Mod. Phys. Letts B24 218710.1142/S0217984910024432 ↗
7. Kandpal H C, Fecher G H, Felser C and Schonhense G 2006 Phys. Rev. B73 09442210.1103/PhysRevB.73.094422 ↗
8. Kohn W and Sham L J 1965 Phys. Rev. A140 113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
9. Miura Y, Nagao K and Shirai M 2004 Phys. Rev. B69 14441310.1103/PhysRevB.69.144413 ↗
10. Rai D P et al 2010 Indian J. Phys. 84 593
11. Raphael M P et al 2002 Phys. Rev. B66 10442910.1103/PhysRevB.66.104429 ↗
12. Yakushi K, Saito K, Takanashi K, Takahashi Y K and Hondo K 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 08250110.1063/1.2177358 ↗
13. Zutic I, Fabian J and Sharma S D 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 32310.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 ↗