Electrical resistivity measurement to predict uniaxial compressive and tensile strength of igneous rocks
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrical resistivity values of 12 different igneous rocks were measured on core samples using a resistivity meter in the laboratory. The resistivity tests were conducted on the samples fully saturated with brine (NaCl solution) and the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength, density and porosity values of the samples were determined in the laboratory. The test results were evaluated using simple and multiple regression analysis. It was seen that the UCS and tensile strength values were linearly correlated with the electrical resistivity. The correlation coefficients are generally higher for the multiple regression models than that of the simple regression models. It was concluded that the UCS and tensile strength of igneous rocks can be estimated from electrical resistivity. However, the derived relations are purely empirical and they should be checked for other igneous rocks. The effect of rock types such as sedimentary and metamorphic rocks on the derived equations also needs to be investigated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Seismic Waves and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Ara T, Bjorndalen N, Talabani S and Islam M R 2004 EEC Innovation 2 20
2. Archie G E 1942 Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Petrol. Eng. 146 54
3. Bilim N, Ozkan I and Gokay M K 2002 Proc. 7th regional rock mech. symp., (Ankara: Kozan Ofset) pp. 121–27 (in Turkish)
4. Brace W F, Orange A S and Madden T R 1965 J. Geophys. Res. 70 566910.1029/JZ070i022p05669 ↗
5. Chelidze T L, Gueguen Y and Ruffet C 1999 Geophys. J. Int. 137 1610.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00800.x ↗
6. Collett L S and Katsube T J 1973 Geophysics 38 7610.1190/1.1440336 ↗
7. Jodicke H 1990 Zonen hoher elektrischer Krustenleitfahigkeit im Rhenoherzynikum and seinem nordlichen Vorland, Ph.D Thesis, Munster University, Germany
8. Kahraman S and Alber M 2006 Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 43 54310.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.09.013 ↗
9. Kahraman S, Ogretici E, Yeken T, and Fener M 2006 EUROCK’06, Europe regional ISRM symp, Liege, Belgium, (London: Taylor and Francis Group) pp 557–56010.1201/9781439833469.ch81 ↗
10. Kaselov A and Shapiro S A 2004 J. Geophys. Eng. 1 110.1088/1742-2132/1/1/001 ↗
11. Kate J M and Sthapak A K 1995 Proc 35th US symp. rock mech., (Rotterdam: Balkema) pp 783–788
12. Schmeling H 1986 Phys. Earth Planet Inter. 43 12310.1016/0031-9201(86)90080-4 ↗
13. Shankland T J and Waff H S 1997 J. Geophys. Res. 82 540910.1029/JB082i033p05409 ↗
14. Shogenova A, Joeleht A, Kirsimae K, Sliaupa S, Rasteniene V and Babele A 2001 Proc. 6th Nordric symp. Petrophysics (Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology) pp 1–14
15. Vinegar H J and Waxman M H 1984 Geophysics 49 126710.1190/1.1441755 ↗
16. Vipulanandan C and Garas V 2008 J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 20 9310.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:2(93) ↗