A cellulosic paper-based sensor for detection of starch contamination in milk
Source abstract
Abstract
Chemical and biomolecular analysis form an integral part of food contamination testing and healthcare diagnostics. The majority of the currently established detection methods are expensive, sophisticated and time consuming. Microfluidic-based lab-on-a-chip systems offer a promising alternative in this regard by enabling the development of simpler and relatively cost-effective platforms for analytical applications. In this work, we report the fabrication of a portable sensor platform using selective wax impregnation of cellulosic paper. The application of the fabricated paper-based lab-on-a-chip device is demonstrated for the qualitative and quantitative detection of starch contamination in milk using colorimetry. Integration of a detection procedure with smartphone imaging allows for on-the-spot data collection, thus overcoming the challenges of sample storage, handling and transportation to lab facilities. This approach offers a versatile method for diagnostic and sensing applications in resource-limited areas, especially in developing and underdeveloped countries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Martinez A W, Phillips S T, Whitesides G M and Carrilho E 2010 Anal. Chem.82 310.1021/ac9013989 ↗
2. Cuevas L E 2011 Indian J. Pediatr. 78 44910.1007/s12098-010-0354-0 ↗
3. Azad T and Ahmed S 2016 Int. J. Food Contam.3 2210.1186/s40550-016-0045-3 ↗
4. Singuluri H and Sukumaran M K 2014 J. Chromatogr. Sep. Tech.5 21210.4172/2157-7064.1000212 ↗
5. Peeling R W, Smith P G and Bossuyt P M 2010 Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4 S210.1038/nrmicro1522 ↗
6. Whitesides G M 2006 Nature442 36810.1038/nature05058 ↗
7. Mao X and Huang T J 2012 Lab Chip. 12 141210.1039/c2lc90022j ↗
8. Gong M M and Sinton D 2017 Chem. Rev.117 844710.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00024 ↗
9. Whitesides G 2014 Lab Chip. 14 312510.1039/C4LC90072C ↗
10. Chiu D T, deMello A J, Carlo D D, Doyle P S, Hansen C, Maceiczyk R M et al 2017 Chem. 2 20110.1016/j.chempr.2017.01.009 ↗
11. Dittrich P S and Manz A 2006 Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.5 21010.1038/nrd1985 ↗
12. Weng X and Neethirajan S 2017 Trends Food Sci. Technol.65 1010.1016/j.tifs.2017.04.015 ↗
13. Jokerst J C, Emory J M and Henry C S 2012 Analyst137 2410.1039/C1AN15368D ↗
14. Sia S K and Whitesides G M 2003 Electrophoresis24 356310.1002/elps.200305584 ↗
15. Ren K, Zhou J and Wu H 2013 Acc. Chem. Res.46 239610.1021/ar300314s ↗
16. Busa L S, Mohammadi S, Maeki M, Ishida A, Tani H and Tokeshi M 2016 Micromachines7 8610.3390/mi7050086 ↗
17. Dilna P, Raveendran J, Stanley J and Satheesh Babu T G 2018 Mater. Today Proc.5 1622010.1016/j.matpr.2018.05.113 ↗
18. Carrilho E, Martinez A W and Whitesides G M 2009 Anal. Chem.81 709110.1021/ac901071p ↗
19. Dungchai W, Chailapakul O and Henry C S 2011 Analyst136 7710.1039/C0AN00406E ↗
20. Mahayothee B, Udomkun P, Nagle M, Haewsungcharoen M, Janjai S and Mueller J 2009 Eur. Food Res. Technol.229 32910.1007/s00217-009-1051-y ↗
21. Kuan C M, York R L and Cheng C M 2015 Sci. Rep.5 1857010.1038/srep18570 ↗
22. Borin A, Ferrao M F, Mello C, Maretto D A and Poppi R J 2006 Anal. Chim. Acta579 2510.1016/j.aca.2006.07.008 ↗
23. Dhar N R 1924 J. Phys. Chem.28 12510.1021/j150236a002 ↗