Growth, spectral, structural and mechanical properties of struvite crystal grown in presence of sodium fluoride
Source abstract
Abstract
Struvite or magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate (MAP) is one of the components of urinary stone. Struvite stones are commonly found in women. It forms in human beings as a result of urinary tract infection with urea splitting organisms. These stones can grow rapidly forming “staghorn-calculi”, which is a painful urological disorder. Therefore, it is of prime importance to study the growth and inhibition of struvite crystals. The growth inhibition effect of struvite crystals in sodium metasilicate (SMS) gel in the presence of sodium fluoride has been carried out. Crystals obtained have been analysed by powder and single crystal XRD, SEM–EDX, FTIR and TG–DTA. The results show that the presence of fluoride significantly affects struvite crystal growth and the characteristics of the crystallites produced. The mechanical property of the grown crystals has been investigated by Vickers microhardness testing. Work hardening coefficient was found to be >1·6 for both pure and doped samples which suggests that the crystal belongs to the family of soft material. Presence of sodium fluoride further softened the crystal.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phosphorus and nutrient management · Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Banks E, Chianelli R and Korenstein R 1975 Inorg. Chem. 14 163410.1021/ic50149a041 ↗
2. Benramdane L, Bouatia M, Idrissi M O B and Draoui M 2008 Spectrosc. Lett. 41 7210.1080/00387010801943806 ↗
3. Bichler K H, Eipper E, Naber K, Braun V, Zimmermann R and Lahme S 2002 Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 19 48810.1016/S0924-8579(02)00088-2 ↗
4. Chauhan C K and Joshi M J 2008 Urol. Res. 36 26510.1007/s00240-008-0154-4 ↗
5. Cohen N P and Whitfield H N 1993 World J Urol. 11 1310.1007/BF00182165 ↗
6. Frost R L, Weier M L and Erickson K L 2004 J. Therm. Anal. Cal. 76 102510.1023/B:JTAN.0000032287.08535.b3 ↗
7. Jones A G 2002 Crystallization process system (Heinenann, UK: Butterworth)
8. Kalkura S N, Vaidyan V K, Kanakavel M and Ramasamy P 1993 J. Cryst. Growth 132 61710.1016/0022-0248(93)90092-B ↗
9. Kaloustian J, Pauli A M, Pieroni G and Portuagal H 2002 J. Therm. Anal. Cal. 70 95910.1023/A:1022233026068 ↗
10. Kanchana P and Sekar C 2010 J. Cryst. Growth 312 80810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.12.032 ↗
11. Lerner S P, Gleeson M J and Griffith D P 1989 J. Urol. 141 75310.1016/S0022-5347(17)41002-0 ↗
12. Onitsch E M 1998 Mikroskopie 95 12
13. Ryu H D, Kim D and Lee S I 2008 J. Hazard. Mater. 156 16310.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.010 ↗
14. Sekar C, Kanchana P, Nithyaselvi R and Girija E K 2009 Mater. Chem. Phys. 115 2110.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.11.020 ↗
15. Stefov V, Soptrajanov B, Kuzmanovski I, Lutz H D and Engelen B 2005 J. Mol. Struct. 752 6010.1016/j.molstruc.2005.05.040 ↗
16. Stefov V, Soptrajanov B, Najdoski M, Engelen B and Lutz H D 2008 J. Mol. Struct. 872 8710.1016/j.molstruc.2007.02.017 ↗
17. Wierzbicki A, Sallis, J D, Stevens E D, Smith M and Sikes C S 1997 Calcif. Tissue Int. 61 21610.1007/s002239900326 ↗