Determination of kinetic properties of polyurethane foam decomposition for pyrolysis modelling
Source abstract
Abstract
A non-fire-retardant and a fire retardant polyurethane foam are tested under a nitrogen environment using thermogravimetry at different heating rates of 1, 5, 20 and 60 °C min −1 to obtain the foams’ decomposition behaviours. During decomposition, both foams experience two major mass loss reactions with the second reaction consuming most of the fuel. Three graphical techniques applied to calculate the kinetic properties governing each reaction are kinetic analysis, the Arrhenius plot method and the inflection point methods. In general, these methods are compatible with the pyrolysis model within Fire Dynamics Simulator Version 5 and Gpyro. A normalised version of the inflection point methods is also developed to improve the suitability of the kinetic properties with the simplest decomposition scheme of the pyrolysis model. A consistent trend is noted in the calculated kinetic properties of both foams regardless of the calculation techniques applied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flame retardant materials and properties · Fire dynamics and safety research · Combustion and Detonation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0165-2370(96)00936-910.1016/0165-2370(96)00936-9 ↗
2. 10.1106/Q56W-KUDB-0VRT-6HLF10.1106/Q56W-KUDB-0VRT-6HLF ↗
3. McGrattan K, Baum H, Rehm R, Fire dynamics simulator (version 5) technical reference guide, volume 1: mathematical model, FDS version 5.5, SVN repository revision: 6909. NIST Special Publication 1018-5, 29 October 2010. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
4. Lautenberger C · 2009
5. Pau DSW · 2013
6. Prasad K · 697
7. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.04.01310.1016/j.combustflame.2006.04.013 ↗
8. Rein G · 2005 · 30 · 2327
9. 10.1080/0022233810806643810.1080/00222338108066438 ↗
10. Houck CR, Joines JA, Kay MG. A genetic algorithm for function optimization: a Matlab implementation. Technical report NCSU-IE TR 95-09, 1995. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
11. 10.1007/BF0190401210.1007/BF01904012 ↗
12. 10.1002/fam.81010.1002/fam.810 ↗
13. BS · 2006
14. AS/NZS · 1999
15. Technical Bulletin 117 · 2000
16. Part 25 - Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. Appendix F to part 25, part I - test criteria and procedures for showing compliance with § 25.853, or § 25.855. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1972.
17. 10.1002/app.2370110.1002/app.23701 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.05.00310.1016/j.firesaf.2009.05.003 ↗
19. Tewarson A · 2002 · 3
20. Saber HH · 2010
21. 10.1002/9783527629848.ch1710.1002/9783527629848.ch17 ↗
22. 10.1016/0141-3910(85)90019-910.1016/0141-3910(85)90019-9 ↗
23. 10.1016/0141-3910(85)90107-710.1016/0141-3910(85)90107-7 ↗
24. 10.1002/9780470109038.ch110.1002/9780470109038.ch1 ↗
25. 10.1002/polc.507006012110.1002/polc.5070060121 ↗
26. Lautenberger C · 1201
27. 10.1016/0040-6031(96)02917-610.1016/0040-6031(96)02917-6 ↗
28. 10.1177/073490411243984010.1177/0734904112439840 ↗