journal article·2020-12

Effect of barium sulphate on mechanical, DMA and thermal behaviour of woven aloevera/flax hybrid composites

M Arulmurugan, A S Selvakumar, Krishnasamy Prabu, G Rajamurugan

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The natural fibre-reinforced polymeric composites attract the manufacturing industries due to their recyclability, cost-effectiveness and eco-friendly nature. The natural hybrid reinforced polymeric (HNRP) composite overcomes the limitations in mechanical properties of the mono-natural fibre-reinforced composites. In this research work, the effect of barium sulphate ( $$\hbox {BaSO}_{{4}}$$ ) on the mechanical characterization of HNRP (aloevera/flax/barium sulphate) composites was examined as per ASTM standard. $$\hbox {BaSO}_{{4}}$$ is preferred as a filler based on the absence of self-motion, high density and high melting point (1580 $$\circ $$ C). The thermal stability of the HNRP composite was determined by thermogravimetric analysis (Model: TG/DTA 6200). The water absorption and dynamic mechanical properties of the HNRP composites were estimated. The fractography images were analysed to recognize the fractured surface morphology using a scanning electron microscope. The HNRP5 composite has the maximum tensile strength of 34.72 MPa, predominantly based on the interlocking of the flax fibre and plasticity of the composite improved by the influence of $$\hbox {BaSO}_{{4}}$$ . The impact strength decreased noticeably with the addition of barium sulphate in the composite. The weight reduction of around 7–9% was observed in the temperature range of 100–200 $$\circ $$ C. The mono-composites (HNRP1&2) absorbed, respectively, 4.8 and 3.5% of moisture; with the addition of $$\hbox {BaSO}_{{4}}$$ , the same combination absorbed 4.2 and 3.2% of water content, which was due to the low water absorption capability of $$\hbox {BaSO}4$$ . The storage modulus of the HNRP5 composite has maximum magnitude in the glassy region and minimum in the rubber region.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Dittender D B and Gangarao H V S 2012 Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 43 141910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019 ↗
2. Revati R, Majid M S A, Ridzuan M J M, Normahira M, Nasir N F M, Rahman M N Y et al 2017 Mater. Sci. Eng. 75 75210.1016/j.msec.2017.02.127 ↗
3. Ridzuana M J M, Abdul Majid M S, Afendia M, Azduwin K, Aqmariah Kanafiahaan S N and Dan-mallama Y 2015 Procedia Manuf. 2 35310.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.062 ↗
4. Sekaran A S J, Kumar K P and Pitchandi K 2015 Bull. Mater. Sci. 38 118310.1007/s12034-015-0999-4 ↗
5. Baley C 2002 Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf.33 93910.1016/S1359-835X(02)00040-4 ↗
6. Charlet K, Jernot J P, Gomina M, Bréard J, Morvan C and Baley C 2009 Compos. Sci. Technol. 69 139910.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.002 ↗
7. Puglia D, Biagiotti J and Kenny J M 2005 J. Nat. Fibers 1 2310.1300/J395v01n03_03 ↗
8. Faruk O, Bledzki A K, Fink H P and Sain M 2012 Polym. Sci. 37 1552
9. Eshun K and He Q 2004 Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 44 9110.1080/10408690490424694 ↗
10. Palani Kumar K and Shadrach Jeya Sekaran A 2014 J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 33 1879
11. Baley C, Morvan C and Grohens Y 2005 Macromol. Symp. 222 19510.1002/masy.200550425 ↗
12. Baley C, Le Duigou A, Bourmanud A and Davis P 2012 Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 43 122610.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.005 ↗
13. Flax Council of Canada http://www.flaxcouncil.ca/ [accessed 19.12.2011]
14. Natural fibers http://www.naturalfibers2009.org/en/fibers/flax.html
15. Charlet K, Baley C, Morvan C, Jernot J P, Gomina M and Breard J 2007 Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38 191210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.03.006 ↗
16. Salnikov V V, Ageeva M V, Yumashev V N and Lozovaya V V 1993 Russ. Plant Physiol. 40 416
17. Bledzki A K, Mamun A A, Lucka-Gabor M and Gutowski V S 2008 Polym. Lett. 2 41310.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.50 ↗
18. Van de Velde K and Kiekens P 2002 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 83 263410.1002/app.10229 ↗
19. Ilangovan M, Guna V, Keshavanarayana G and Reddy N 2018 Sugar Tech. 20 45410.1007/s12355-017-0560-4 ↗
20. Arulmurugan M, Prabu K, Rajamurugan G and Selvakumar A S 2019 J. Ind. Text. 1 https://doi.org/10.1177/152808371985231210.1177/1528083719852312 ↗
21. Information about nanomaterials and their safety assessment https://www.nanopartikel.info/en/nanoinfo/materials/barium-sulphate/material-information
22. Arulmurugan M, Prabu K, Rajamurugan G and Selvakumar A S 2019 Mater. Res. Exp.6https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aafb8810.1088/2053-1591/aafb88 ↗
23. Boopalan M, Niranjanaa M and Umapathy M J 2013 Compos. Part B: Eng. 51 5410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.033 ↗
24. Braga R A and Magalhaes Jr P A A 2015 Mater. Sci. Eng. C 56 26910.1016/j.msec.2015.06.031 ↗
25. Alix S, Philippe E, Bessadok A, Lebrun L, Morvan C and Marais S 2009 Bioresour. Technol. 100 474210.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.067 ↗
26. Pillin I, Kervoelen A, Bourmaud A, Goimard J, Montrelay N and Baley C 2011 Ind. Crops Prod. 34 155610.1016/j.indcrop.2011.05.016 ↗
27. Charlet K, Jernot J P, Breard J and Gomina M 2010 Ind. Crops Prod. 32 22010.1016/j.indcrop.2010.04.015 ↗
28. Anbukarasi K and Kalaiselvam S 2015 Mater. Des. 66 32110.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.078 ↗
29. Milanese A C, Cioffi M O H and Voorwald H J C 2012 Compos. Part B: Eng. 43 284310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.048 ↗
30. Narendar R and Priya Dasan K 2014 Compos. Part B: Eng. 56 77010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.028 ↗