Antibacterial, antioxidant properties of Solanum trilobatum and sodium hydroxide-mediated magnesium oxide nanoparticles: a green chemistry approach
Source abstract
Abstract
A comparative study of Solanum trilobatum-mediated magnesium oxide (St-MgO) nanoparticles (NPs) and sodium hydroxide-mediated MgO (Che-MgO) NPs are synthesized using magnesium nitrate precursor. The characterization analyses, such as ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy (UV–Vis), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDX), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and particle-size analysis were carried out. To determine the antioxidant activity of MgO NPs by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method and antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (MTCC: 912), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC: 121) and Streptococcus pyogenes (MTCC: 1925), was performed by the well-diffusion method. The UV–Vis analysis of St-MgO, Che-MgO confirmed the formation of MgO NPs that have a broad absorption peak at 362 and 374 nm, respectively. IR spectrum of synthesized St-MgO and Che-MgO exhibits a high-intensity band at 440 and 460 $$\text {cm}-1$$ , respectively. XRD analysis indicates that synthesized St-MgO, Che-MgO were crystal in nature and EDX confirmed the composition of MgO-NPs. SEM analysis revealed that St-MgO and Che-MgO NPs were spherical in shape without aggregation. Particle-size analysis confirmed that the average particle sizes of St-MgO and Che-MgO NPs were 30 and 42 nm, respectively. DPPH assay of St-MgO NPs has higher absorbance value, which indicates the high antioxidant capacity compared with ascorbic acid. St-MgO NPs are effective against bacterial pathogens, such as E. coli (16.66 ± 0.66), B. subtilis (16.00 ± 0.88) and S. pyogenes (13.66 ± 2.08) at 100 mg $$\hbox {ml}-1$$ concentration when compared with Che-MgO and the control ( $$P<0.001$$ ). Thus, the result suggested that safer use of biologically synthesized MgO NPs can act as effective antioxidant and antibacterial agents in the field of biomedicine.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Alaa Y G, Tawfiq M A, Akl M M and Muhand W A 2017 ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 10 293
2. Al-Gaashani R, Radiman S, Al-Douri Y, Tabet N and Daud A R 2012 J. Alloys Compd. 52 7110.1016/j.jallcom.2012.01.045 ↗
3. Al-Hazmi F, Alnowaiser F, Al-Ghamdi A A, Aly M M, Al-Tuwirqi R M and El-Tantawy F 2012 Superlattices Microstruct. 52 20010.1016/j.spmi.2012.04.013 ↗
4. Alvarado E, Torres-Martinez L M and Fuentes A F 2000 Polyhedron 19 234510.1016/S0277-5387(00)00570-2 ↗
5. Bhatte K D, Sawant D N, Watile R A and Bhanage B M 2012 Mater. Lett. 69 6610.1016/j.matlet.2011.10.112 ↗
6. Doss A, Muhamed M H and Dhanabalan R 2009 Indian J. Sci. Tech. 2 4110.17485/ijst/2009/v2i2.5 ↗
7. Ganapathi R K, Ashok C H, Venkateswara R K, Shilpa Chakra C H and Akshaykranth A 2015 Int. J. Adv. Res. Phys. Sci. 2 1
8. Huang L, Li D Q, Lin Y J, Evans D G and Duan X 2005 Chin. Sci. Bull. 50 51410.1007/BF03183654 ↗
9. Jawhar M, Amalan R G and Jeyaseelan M 2004 Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 14 107
10. Kanchana D, Jayanthi M, Kanchana D, Saranraj P and Sujitha D 2013 Int. J. Microbiol. Res. 4 300
11. Krishnamoorthy K, Manivannan G, Kim S J, Jeyasubramanian K and Premanathan M 2012 J. Nanoparticle Res. 14 106310.1007/s11051-012-1063-6 ↗
12. Kumar D, Reddy Yadav L S, Lingaraju K, Manjunath K, Suresh D, Prasad D et al 2015 AIP Conf. Proc. 1665 05014510.1063/1.4917786 ↗
13. Li Y J, Li D Q, Wang G, Huang L and Duan X 2005 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 16 5310.1007/s10856-005-6446-0 ↗
14. Vanaja M, Paulkumar K, Baburaja M, Rajeshkumar S, Gnanajobitha G, Malarkodi C et al 2014 Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2014 810.1155/2014/742346 ↗
15. Marina Z, Mariana P, Thiele F B, Aline A B, Robson B F, Michel M M et al 2012 Molecules 17 1256010.3390/molecules171112560 ↗
16. Narendhran S, Rajiv P, Vanathi P and Rajeshwari S 2014 Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 6 319
17. Narendhran S, Rajiv P and Rajeshwari S 2016 Bull. Mater. Sci. 39 110.1007/s12034-015-1136-0 ↗
18. Pacholski C, Kornowski A and Weller H 2002 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 118810.1002/1521-3773(20020402)41:7<1188::AID-ANIE1188>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
19. Palanisamy G and Pazhanivel T 2017 Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech. 4 137
20. Raghupati R K, Koodali R T and Manna A C 2011 Langmuir 27 402010.1021/la104825u ↗
21. Rai M and Ingle A 2012 Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 94 28710.1007/s00253-012-3969-4 ↗
22. Rajeshwari S, Rahman P K S M, Rajiv P, Narendhran S and Venckatesh R 2014 Spectrochim. Acta Part A 129 25510.1016/j.saa.2014.03.027 ↗
23. Rajiv P, Rajeshwari S and Venckatesh R 2013 Spectrochim. Acta Part A 112 38410.1016/j.saa.2013.04.072 ↗
24. Renata D 2016 Iran. J. Sci. Technol. A 1 9
25. Selvam N C S, Kumar R T, Kennedy L J and Vijaya J J 2011 J. Alloys Compd. 509 980910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.08.032 ↗
26. Shahjahan M, Sabitha K E, Jamu M and Shyamala Devi C S 2004 Indian J. Med. Res. 120 194
27. Sri Vishnupriya R, Narendhran S and Rajeshwari S 2016 Bull. Mater. Sci. 39 36110.1007/s12034-016-1173-3 ↗
28. Stoimenov P K, Klinger R L, Marchin G L and Klabunde K J 2002 Langmuir 18 667910.1021/la0202374 ↗
29. Sundrarajan M, Suresh J and Gandhi R R 2012 Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 7 983