journal article·2020-12

3D printing of semicrystalline polypropylene: towards eliminating warpage of printed objects

Nirmalya Bachhar, Aniket Gudadhe, Anil Kumar, Prem Andrade, Guruswamy Kumaraswamy

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is an extrusion-based 3D printing technique for thermoplastic polymers. In this technique, molten polymer is extruded through a print nozzle and is laid down layer by layer to build up the printed object. Currently, FFF is used primarily to print amorphous or low-crystallinity polymers, such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymer (ABS) or polylactic acid (PLA). Printing of semicrystalline polymers, such as polyethylene or polypropylene remains particularly challenging. During FFF of semicrystalline polymers, large thermomechanical stresses are generated when the polymer solidifies on cooling. These stresses result in warpage of the printed part. Here, we analyse the factors that influence stresses generated during FFF 3D printing of a commercial semicrystalline polymer, isotactic polypropylene. We investigate the effect of height of the printed object on part warpage, as well the effect of infilling during printing. We demonstrate that the stresses generated during FFF can be substantially decreased by incorporation of a ‘brim’, viz. a thin layer at the base of the printed object, and by adhering the brim to the print substrate using common polyvinyl acetate-based glue. We systematically investigate the effect of the brim size on the warpage of the printed object. We support our experimental findings with finite element method (FEM) simulations that explain the mechanism of stress buildup during printing. The trend in stresses calculated in the FEM simulations parallel the warpage measured in the experiments. Thus, this work represents an important methodological advance towards warpage-free FFF printing of semicrystalline polymers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Ligon S C, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M and Mülhaupt R 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 1021210.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
2. McIlroy C and Olmsted P D 2017 J. Rheol. (NY) 61 37910.1122/1.4976839 ↗
3. Davis C S, Hillgartner K E, Han S H and Seppala J E 2017 Addit. Manuf. 16 162
4. Seppala J E, Hoon Han S, Hillgartner K E, Davis C S and Migler K B 2017 Soft Matter 13 676110.1039/C7SM00950J ↗
5. Spreeman M E, Stretz H A and Dadmun M D 2019 Addit. Manuf. 27 267
6. Levenhagen N P and Dadmun M D 2019 ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 1 87610.1021/acsapm.9b00051 ↗
7. Masood S H 2014 in Advances in fused deposition modelling S Hashmi (ed) (Amsterdam: Elsevier) vol 1, p 6910.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01002-5 ↗
8. Vaezi M, Seitz H and Yang S 2013 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 67 172110.1007/s00170-012-4605-2 ↗
9. Kucherov F A, Gordeev E G, Kashin A S and Ananikov V P 2017 Angew. Chemie — Int. Ed. 56 1593110.1002/anie.201708528 ↗
10. Jones A T, Aizlewood J M and Beckett D R 1964 Die Makromol. Chemie 75 13410.1002/macp.1964.020750113 ↗
11. Geyer R, Jambeck J R and Law K L 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e170078210.1126/sciadv.1700782 ↗
12. Eagan J M, Xu J, Di Girolamo R, Thurber C M, Macosko C W, LaPointe A M et al 2017 Science355 81410.1126/science.aah5744 ↗
13. Chong S, Pan G-T, Khalid M, Yang T C-K, Hung S-T and Huang C-M 2017 J. Polym. Environ. 25 13610.1007/s10924-016-0793-4 ↗
14. Chibowski E and Terpilowski K 2009 Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 157310.1016/j.apsusc.2009.09.024 ↗
15. Nielsen A, Batchelder D and Pyrz R 2002 Polymer (Guildf) 43 267110.1016/S0032-3861(02)00053-8 ↗
16. Spoerk M, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Lichal C, Cajner H, Berger G, Schuschnigg S et al 2018 Polymers (Basel) 10 49010.3390/polym10050490 ↗
17. Carneiro O S, Silva A F and Gomes R 2015 Mater. Des. 83 76810.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053 ↗
18. Spoerk M, Savandaiah C, Arbeiter F, Sapkota J and Holzer C 2019 Polym. Compos. 40 63810.1002/pc.24701 ↗
19. Azaman M D, Sapuan S M, Sulaiman S, Zainudin E S and Khalina A 2013 Mater. Des. 52 101810.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.047 ↗
20. Spoerk M, Sapkota J, Weingrill G, Fischinger T, Arbeiter F and Holzer C 2017 Macromol. Mater. Eng. 302 170014310.1002/mame.201700143 ↗
21. Spoerk M, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Sapkota J, Schuschnigg S and Holzer C 2018 Plast. Rubber Compos. 47 1710.1080/14658011.2017.1399531 ↗
22. Kaynak B, Spoerk M, Shirole A, Ziegler W and Sapkota J 2018 Macromol. Mater. Eng. 303 180003710.1002/mame.201800037 ↗
23. Stoof D and Pickering K 2017 J. Compos. Sci.1 810.3390/jcs1010008 ↗
24. Wang L and Gardner D J 2017 Polymer (Guildf) 113 7410.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.055 ↗
25. Bathe K-J 1996 Finite element procedure (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall)
26. Cook R D 1981 Concepts and applications of finite element analysis 2nd edn (New York: John Wiley and Sons)
27. Bonet J and Wood R D 1997 Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis (New York: University Press)
28. Peng H, Go D B, Billo R, Gong S, Shankar M R, Gatrell B A et al 2016 in Solid Free. Fabr. Proc. 27th Ann. Int. Symp. — An Addit. Manuf. Conf. p 382
29. Mark J E 1999 Polymer data handbook 2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press)
30. Gudadhe A, Bachhar N, Kumar A, Andrade P and Kumaraswamy G 2019 ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 1 315710.1021/acsapm.9b00813 ↗