Effect of TiO2–graphene nanocomposite photoanode on dye-sensitized solar cell performance
Source abstract
Abstract
In this research work, graphene–TiO2 photoanodes with various graphene concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 wt%) were deposited on fluorine tin oxide glass substrates as working electrodes for dyesensitized solar cells. The structure, morphology, surface composition and dye adsorption of the photoanodes were investigated by X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and UV–VIS–NIR spectroscopy, respectively. The photocurrent–voltage characteristics of the dye-sensitized solar cells were examined using a solar simulator. The results indicated that the dye adsorption on photoanode surfaces increases with the increase in the graphene content. In addition, dye-sensitized solar cells efficiency increases with the increase in the graphene content to 1.5 wt% and then decreased. The efficiency of the dyesensitized solar cell, based on the TiO2–1.5 wt% graphene nanocomposite, increased by 42% with respect to the pristine sample.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Han D, Meng Z, Wu D, Zhang C and Zhu H 2011 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 45710.1186/1556-276X-6-457 ↗
2. Subramanian A, Ho C Y and Wang H 2013 J. Alloys Compd. 572 1110.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.171 ↗
3. Tang Y B, Lee C S, Xu J, Liu Z T, Chen Z H, He Z, Cao Y L, Yuan G, Song H, Chen L, Luo L, Cheng H M, Zhang W J, Bello I and Lee S T 2010 ACS Nano 4 348210.1021/nn100449w ↗
4. Zhou L C Y, Tu W, Li Z, Bao C, Dai H, Yu T, Liu J and Zou Z 2013 Nanoscale 5 348110.1039/c3nr34059g ↗
5. Choi H, Nahm C., Kim J, Kim C., Kang S, Hwang T and Park B 2013 Curr. Appl. Phys. 13 S210.1016/j.cap.2013.01.023 ↗
6. Wang H, Su C., Wu C., Tsai H, Li C. and Li W 2013 Thin Solid Films 529 1510.1016/j.tsf.2012.07.079 ↗
7. Murali S, Lee S P and Birnie D P 2013 Thin Solid Films 537 8010.1016/j.tsf.2013.04.039 ↗
8. Neo C Y and Ouyang J 2013 J. Power Sources 241 64710.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.146 ↗
9. Lee K and Schmuki P 2012 Electrochem. Commun. 25 1110.1016/j.elecom.2012.08.026 ↗
10. Yang S, Guo S, Xu D, Xue H, Kou H, Wang J and Zhu G 2013 J. Fluorine Chem. 150 7810.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.03.012 ↗
11. Yang N, Zhai J, Wang D, Chen Y and Jiang L 2010 ACS Nano 4 88710.1021/nn901660v ↗
12. Sun S, Gao L and Liu Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 83
13. Lamberti A, Sacco A, Bianco S, Quaglio M, Manfredi D and Pirri C F 2013 Microelectron. Eng. 111 13710.1016/j.mee.2013.03.037 ↗
14. Eshaghi A, Mozaffarinia R and Pakshir M 2011 Ceram. Int. 37 32710.1016/j.ceramint.2010.09.008 ↗
15. Bryanvand M M, Kharat A N and Badiei A R 2012 J. Nanostruc. 2 19
16. Chen L, Zhou Y, Tu W, Li Z, Bao C, Dai H, Yu T, Liu J and Zou Z 2013 Nanoscale 5 348110.1039/c3nr34059g ↗
17. Cheng H M, Zhang W J, Bello I and Lee S T 2010 ACS Nano 4 348210.1021/nn100449w ↗