journal article·2014-04

Effect of tempering after cryogenic treatment of tungsten carbide–cobalt bounded inserts

NIRMAL S KALSI, RAKESH SEHGAL, VISHAL S SHARMA

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 37· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Cryogenic treatment is a recent advancement in the field of machining to improve the properties of cutting tool materials. Tungsten carbide is the most commonly used cutting tool material in the industry and the technique can also be extended to it. Although the importance of tempering after cryogenic treatment has been discussed by many researchers, very little information is available in published literature about the effect of multi-tempering after cryogenic treatment. In this study, an attempt has been made to understand effect of the number of post-tempering cycles during cryogenic treatment on tungsten carbide–cobalt inserts. Metallurgical investigations have been performed to observe the effect of such post-tempering on the inserts by analysing microhardness and micro-structural changes. The crystal structure and morphology were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. Metallurgical investigations revealed a significant improvement in tungsten carbide inserts having three tempering cycles, after cryogenic treatment, with marginal differences for two cycles of tempered inserts, established by the study of wear behaviour in turning.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Advanced materials and composites · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. ASTM B390-92 2000 Standard practice for evaluating apparent grain size and distribution of cemented tungsten carbide. Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 02(05)
2. ASTM B657-92 2000 Standard method for metallograpic determination of microstructure in cemented carbides. Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 02(05)
3. Bal K S 2012 Performance appraisal of cryo-treated tool by turning operation. Master’s Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela
4. Bensely A, Prabhakaran A, Lal D M and Nagarajan G 2005 Cryogenics 45 74710.1016/j.cryogenics.2005.10.004 ↗
5. Bryson W E 1999 Cryogenics (Ohio: USA Hanser Gardner Publications) 81
6. Buss K 2004 High temperature deformation mechanisms of cemented carbides and cermets. Thesis EPFL No. 3095, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothemburg, Sweden
7. Cajner F, Leskovsek V, Landek D and Cajner H 2009 Mater. Manuf. Process. 24 74310.1080/10426910902809743 ↗
8. Chawla N, Patel B V, Koopman M, Chawla K K, Saha R, Patterson B R, Fuller E R and Langer S A 2003 Mater. Charact. 49 39510.1016/S1044-5803(03)00054-8 ↗
9. Choi N S, Kim Y B, Kim TWand Rhee K Y 2003 J. Mater. Sci. 38 101310.1023/A:1022393629338 ↗
10. Gallagher A H, Agosti C D and Roth J T 2005 Trans. North Am. Manuf. Res. Inst. S.M.E. 33 153
11. Gill S S, Singh R, Singh H and Singh J 2008 Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 49 25610.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.11.001 ↗
12. Gill S S, Singh H, Singh R and Singh J 2010 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48 17510.1007/s00170-009-2263-9 ↗
13. Gill S S, Singh J, Singh H and Singh R 2012 Int. J. Manuf. Technol. 58 11910.1007/s00170-011-3369-4 ↗
14. Gisip J, Gazo R and Stewart H A 2009 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 511710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.02.010 ↗
15. ISO 3685 1993 Tool-life testing with single-point turning tools, ICS 25:100:10
16. Kalsi N S, Sehgal R and Sharma V S 2010 Mater. Manuf. Process 25 107710.1080/10426911003720862 ↗
17. Kalsi N S, Sehgal R and Sharma V S 2012 Adv. Mater. Research. 410 26710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.410.267 ↗
18. Krar S, Gill A and Smid P 2008 Technology of Machine Tools, 6th edition (New Delhi: McGraw-Hill Education (I) Pvt Ltd.) 223
19. Lavergne O, Robaut F, Hodaj F and Allibert C H 2002 Acta Materialia 50 168310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00011-3 ↗
20. Oberg E, Jones F D, Horton H L, Ryffel H H, McCauley C J, Heald R M and Hussain M I 2004 Machinery’s Handbook (New York: Industrial Press) 27 1009
21. Podgornik B, Leskovsek V and Vizintin J 2009 Mater. Manuf. Process. 24 73410.1080/10426910902809339 ↗
22. Reddy T V S, Kumar B S A, Reddy M V and Venkataram R 2007 Improvement of tool life of cryogenically treated P-30 tools. Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Materials and Composites (ICAMC-2007) at the National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, CSIR, Trivandrum, India, p. 457
23. Reddy T V S, Kumar T S, Reddy M V and Venkatram R 2008 Cryogenics 48 45810.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.06.001 ↗
24. Reddy T V S, Kumar T S, Reddy M V and Venkatram R 2009 Int. J. Refrct. Met. Hard Mater. 27 18110.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.04.007 ↗
25. Richetti A, Machado A R, DaSilva M, Ezugwu B E O and Bonney J 2004 Int. J. Mach. Tools. Manuf. 44 69510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.02.007 ↗
26. Sarin V K 1981. Advances in Powder Technology ASM (ed.) D Y Chin 253
27. Seah K H W, Rahman M and Yong K H 2003 Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B-J Eng. Manuf 217 2910.1243/095440503762502260 ↗
28. Steward H 2008 FDM, ABI/INFORM Global. 80 64
29. Stewart H A 2004 For. Prod. J. 54 53
30. Thakur D, Ramamoorthy B and Vijayaraghavan L 2008 Mater. Lett. 62 440310.1016/j.matlet.2008.07.043 ↗
31. Vadivel K and Rudramoorthy R 2009 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 42 22210.1007/s00170-008-1597-z ↗
32. Yang H S, Jun Wang, Shen B L, Liu H H, Gao S J and Huang S J 2006 Wear 261 115010.1016/j.wear.2006.03.021 ↗
33. Yong A Y L, Seah K H W and Rahman M 2006 Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 46 205110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.002 ↗
34. Yong A Y L, Seah K H W and Rahman M 2007 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 32 63810.1007/s00170-005-0379-0 ↗