Biogenic ZnO nanoparticles synthesized using L. aculeata leaf extract and their antifungal activity against plant fungal pathogens
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles were synthesized using aqueous extract of Lantana aculeata Linn. leaf and assessed their effects on antifungal activity against the plant fungal pathogens. Synthesized nanoparticles were confirmed by ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer, X-ray diffractometer, Field-emission scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The antifungal activity of ZnO nanoparticles were determined using the well diffusion method. All the characterization analyses revealed that nanoparticles were highly stable and crystalline in nature. L. aculeata-mediated ZnO nanoparticles were spherical in shape with an average particle size of 12 ± 3 nm. Antifungal studies concluded that the maximum zone of inhibition was observed in Aspergillus flavus (21 ± 1.0 mm) and Fusarium oxysporum (19 ± 1.0 mm) at 100 μg ml −1 concentration. These results clearly indicated the benefits of using ZnO nanoparticles synthesized using biological methods and shown to have antifungal activities and also that it can be effectively used as antifungal agent in environmental aspect of agricultural development.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Dielectric properties of ceramics · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Suresh Babu K and Narayanan V 2013 Chem. Sci. Trans. 1 33
2. Khorsand Zak A, Razali R, Abd Majid W H and Darroudi M 2011 Int. J. Nanomed. 6 139910.2147/IJN.S19693 ↗
3. Ball P 2002 Nanotechnology 13 1510.1088/0957-4484/13/5/201 ↗
4. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L and Li N 2006 Science 311 62210.1126/science.1114397 ↗
5. Roco M C 2003 J. Nanopart. Res. 5 8110.1023/A:1024434502893 ↗
6. Chen Y B, Koh H J, Park K T, Hiraga K, Zhu Z and Yao T 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 34 391210.1063/1.368595 ↗
7. Abhulimen U 2005 Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1 27
8. Look D C 2001 J. Mat. Sci. Eng. B 80 38310.1016/S0921-5107(00)00604-8 ↗
9. Vanaja M, Gnanajobitha G, Paulkumar K, Rajeshkumar S, Malarkodi C and Annadurai G 2013 J. Nanostruct. Chem. 3 1710.1186/2193-8865-3-17 ↗
10. Iravani S 2011 Green. Chem. 13 263810.1039/c1gc15386b ↗
11. Mohanpuria P R and Yadav S K 2009 J. Nanopart. Res. 10 50710.1007/s11051-007-9275-x ↗
12. Vanathi P, Rajiv P, Narendhran S, Rajeshwari S, Rahman P K S M and Venckatesh R 2014 Mater. Lett. 134 1310.1016/j.matlet.2014.07.029 ↗
13. Song J Y J and Kim B S 2009 Process Biochem. 44 113310.1016/j.procbio.2009.06.005 ↗
14. Jha A K P and Prasad K 2009 Biochem. Eng. 43 30310.1016/j.bej.2008.10.016 ↗
15. Ghisalberti E L 2000 Fitoterapia 71 46710.1016/S0367-326X(00)00202-1 ↗
16. Rajendiran K, Soumiya D and Sudaroli Sudha J 2014 Int. J. Food Agric. Vet. Sci. 4 165
17. Rajiv P, Rajeshwari S and Venckatesh R 2013 Spectrochim. Acta Part A 112 38410.1016/j.saa.2013.04.072 ↗
18. Ankanna S and Savithramma N 2011 Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 4 137
19. Madhumitha R, Karthikka P and Navin Kumar S 2014 J. Global Biosci. 3 415
20. Qu J, Luo C and Hou J 2011 Micro. Nano. Lett. 6 17410.1049/mnl.2011.0004 ↗
21. Tas A C, Majewski P J and Aldinger F 2002 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85 142110.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00291.x ↗
22. Kwon Y J, Kim K H, Lim C S and Shim K B 2002 J. Ceram. Proc. Res. 3 146
23. Vanheusden K, Seager C H, Warren W L, Tallant D R and Voigt J A 1996 Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 40310.1063/1.116699 ↗