journal article·2026-04Open access

Prediction of process-induced deformation in CFRP multispar flaps using sequentially coupled thermomechanical analysis considering fabric patterns and stacking sequences

Dong-Hyeop Kim, Sang-Woo Kim, Tae Su Kim

Abstract

This study presents a sequentially coupled thermomechanical FE-based approach for analyzing process-induced deformation (PID) in CFRP multispar flaps during the curing cycle. The proposed method enables a detailed investigation of curing behaviors by incorporating critical material characteristics, including complex curing properties and fabric patterns. A two-step simulation framework, integrating heat transfer and mechanical analyses, was employed to evaluate the effects of thermal gradients, cure kinetics, and thermochemical deformation on PID. The results revealed significant temperature gradients influencing the degree of cure (DoC) and PID throughout the curing cycle. By the end of the process, the temperature distribution became uniform, and the DoC stabilized at approximately 0.91. PID behaviors transitioned progressively throughout the curing stages, with thermal expansion prevailing during early deformations, while chemical and thermal shrinkage became the primary factors in subsequent stages. These findings indicate that minimizing deformation necessitates not only the optimization of geometric designs but also the precise adjustment of curing profiles and fabric patterns informed by the thermochemical behavior of materials. The methodology proposed in this study facilitates the strategic optimization of curing properties, fabric characteristics, and manufacturing parameters, enabling effective PID control. Furthermore, this study offers valuable insights into enhancing the design and manufacturing processes of aerospace composite structures, ensuring greater structural integrity, dimensional stability, and overall performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Lim J, Kim SW (2024) Unleashing the potential of CFRP laminate: enhancing mechanical characteristics with STF-Impregnated woven carbon fabric. Adv Compos Mater 33:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2024.231570310.1080/09243046.2024.2315703 ↗
2. Kim DH, Kim SW (2024) Enhanced prediction of reflected spectrum for FBG sensors with metallic coating embedded in CFRP composites: Unveiling the impact of process-induced residual stress and coating thickness. Compos Struct 344:118321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11832110.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118321 ↗
3. Byun SW, Choi DK, Lee SY, Lee CJ, Kim SW (2024) Detection of internal damage in CFRP-laminated plates using signal extraction method. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 25:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00655-810.1007/s42405-023-00655-8 ↗
4. Kim DH, Kim SW (2024) Shell element-based prediction of process-induced deformation considering the different fabric parameters and stacking sequences of CFRP woven composites. Adv Compos Mater 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2024.238476610.1080/09243046.2024.2384766 ↗
5. Bae J, Kim S, Kang J (2025) Novel design and validation test of rollable CFRP blade for UAM. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-024-00875-610.1007/s42405-024-00875-6 ↗
6. Siddiqui F, Ali Q, Mahmood A (2024) Determination of acceptable ranges of asymmetric manufacturing tolerances based on structural analysis for a drone wing. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-024-00829-y10.1007/s42405-024-00829-y ↗
7. Wang B, Fan S, Chen J, Yang W, Liu W, Li Y (2023) A review on prediction and control of curing process-induced deformation of continuous fiber-reinforced thermosetting composite structures. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 165:107321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10732110.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107321 ↗
8. Amann C, Kreissl S, Grass H, Meinhardt J (2017) A review on process-induced distortions of carbon fiber reinforced thermosets for large-scale production. Prod Eng 11:665–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0772-110.1007/s11740-017-0772-1 ↗
9. Johnston AA (1997) An integrated model of the development of process-induced deformation in autoclave processing of composite structures. Dissertation, University of British Columbia https://doi.org/10.14288/1.008880510.14288/1.0088805 ↗
10. Griffin OH Jr (1983) Three-dimensional curing stresses in symmetric cross-ply laminates with temperature-dependent properties. J Compos Mater 17:449–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983830170050610.1177/002199838301700506 ↗
11. Hahn HT, Pagano NJ (1975) Curing stresses in composite laminates. J Compos Mater 9:91–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983750090011010.1177/002199837500900110 ↗
12. Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers. John Wiley, New York
13. Kim YK, White SR (1996) Stress relaxation behavior of 3501-6 epoxy resin during cure. Polym Eng Sci 36:2852–2862. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.1068610.1002/pen.10686 ↗
14. Prasatya P, McKenna GB, Simon SL (2001) A viscoelastic model for predicting isotropic residual stresses in thermosetting materials: effects of processing parameters. J Compos Mater 35:826–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/a03732210.1177/a037322 ↗
15. Benavente M, Marcin L, Courtois A, Lévesque M, Ruiz E (2017) Viscoelastic distortion in asymmetric plates during post curing. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 103:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.017 ↗
16. Zhang G, Wang J, Ni A, Hu H, Ding A, Li S (2019) Process-induced deformation of L-shaped variable-stiffness composite structures during cure. Compos Struct 230:111461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11146110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111461 ↗
17. Ding A, Li S, Sun J, Wang J, Zu L (2016) A thermo-viscoelastic model of process-induced residual stresses in composite structures with considering thermal dependence. Compos Struct 136:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.014 ↗
18. Benavente M, Marcin L, Courtois A, Lévesque M, Ruiz E (2018) Numerical analysis of viscoelastic process-induced residual distortions during manufacturing and post-curing. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 107:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.005 ↗
19. Li D, Li X, Dai J (2018) Process modelling of curing process-induced internal stress and deformation of composite laminate structure with elastic and viscoelastic models. Appl Compos Mater 25:527–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-017-9633-510.1007/s10443-017-9633-5 ↗
20. Dai J, Xi S, Li D (2019) Numerical analysis of curing residual stress and deformation in thermosetting composite laminates with comparison between different constitutive models. Materials 12:572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1204057210.3390/ma12040572 ↗
21. Sun L, Wang J, Ni A, Li S, Ding A (2017) Modelling and experiment of process-induced distortions in unsymmetrical laminate plates. Compos Struct 182:524–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.018 ↗
22. Kiauka M, Kasatkin M, Tcygantceva I, Efimov-Soini N, Borovkov A (2021) Method for residual strain modeling taking into account mold and distribution of heat transfer coefficients for thermoset composite material parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117:2429–2443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07149-510.1007/s00170-021-07149-5 ↗
23. Chen W, Zhang D (2019) Improved prediction of residual stress induced warpage in thermoset composites using a multiscale thermo-viscoelastic processing model. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 126:105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10557510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105575 ↗
24. Zhang G, Wang J, Ni A (2019) Process-induced stress and deformation of variable-stiffness composite cylinders during curing. Materials 12:259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1202025910.3390/ma12020259 ↗
25. Brauner C, Bauer S, Herrmann AS (2015) Analysing process-induced deformation and stresses using a simulated manufacturing process for composite multispar flaps. J Compos Mater 49:387–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831351928110.1177/0021998313519281 ↗
26. Kim DH, Kim SW (2023) Process-induced distortion of triaxially braided composites considering different geometric parameters using simplified constitutive model with effective property. Finite Elem Anal Des 222:103974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2023.10397410.1016/j.finel.2023.103974 ↗
27. Kim DH, Kim SW, Lee I (2022) Evaluation of curing process-induced deformation in plain woven composite structures based on cure kinetics considering various fabric parameters. Compos Struct 287:115379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11537910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115379 ↗
28. Schoenholz C, Zobeiry N (2024) An accelerated process optimization method to minimize deformations in composites using theory-guided probabilistic machine learning. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 176:107842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10784210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107842 ↗
29. Liu Q, Wang X, Guan Z, Li Z (2024) Rapid prediction and parameter evaluation of process-induced deformation in L-shape structures based on feature selection and artificial neural networks. J Compos Sci 8:455. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs811045510.3390/jcs8110455 ↗
30. Guo J, Liu S, Li Y, Meng Q, Liu X, Hao X (2024) Rapid prediction of the cure-induced distortion of newly developed composite parts via transfer learning. Compos Struct 339:118139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11813910.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118139 ↗
31. Fan S, Zhang J, Wang B, Chen J, Yang W, Liu W, Li Y (2023) A deep learning method for fast predicting curing process-induced deformation of aeronautical composite structures. Compos Sci Technol 232:109844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10984410.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109844 ↗
32. Bogetti TA, Gillespie JW Jr (1991) Two-dimensional cure simulation of thick thermosetting composites. J Compos Mater 25:239–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983910250030210.1177/002199839102500302 ↗
33. Li X, Wang J, Li S, Ding A (2020) Cure-induced temperature gradient in laminated composite plate: Numerical simulation and experimental measurement. Compos Struct 253:112822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11282210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112822 ↗
34. Kulkarni MR, Brady RP (1997) A model of global thermal conductivity in laminated carbon/carbon composites. Compos Sci Technol 57:277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00116-910.1016/S0266-3538(96)00116-9 ↗
35. Cole KC, Hechler JJ, Noel D (1994) A new approach to modeling the cure kinetics of epoxy/amine thermosetting resins. 2. Application to a typical system based on bis [4-(diglycidylamino) phenyl] methane and bis (4-aminophenyl) sulfone. Macromolecules 24:3098–3110. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00011a01210.1021/ma00011a012 ↗
36. Garstka T, Ersoy N, Potter KD, Wisnom MR (2007) In situ measurements of through-the-thickness strains during processing of AS4/8552 composite. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 38:2517–2526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.018 ↗
37. Ding A, Li S, Wang J, Ni A, Sun L, Chang L (2016) Prediction of process-induced distortions in L-shaped composite profiles using path-dependent constitutive law. Appl Compos Mater 23:1027–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-016-9501-810.1007/s10443-016-9501-8 ↗
38. Baran I, Akkerman R, Hattel JH (2014) Material characterization of a polyester resin system for the pultrusion process. Compos B Eng 64:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.03010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.030 ↗
39. Koenis TPA, Hoorn NV, van den Brink WM (2021) Calibration and validation of a numerical BMI curing model using asymmetric laminated composite plates. http://hdl.handle.net/10921/158810.23967/composites.2021.035 ↗
40. Chawla KK (2012) Composite materials: science and engineering, 3rd edn. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74365-310.1007/978-0-387-74365-3 ↗
41. Kumbhare N, Moheimani R, Dalir H (2021) Analysis of composite structures in curing process for shape deformations and shear stress: basis for advanced optimization. J Compos Sci 5:63. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs502006310.3390/jcs5020063 ↗
42. Abdelal G, Robotham A, Cantwell W (2013) Autoclave cure simulation of composite structures applying implicit and explicit FE techniques. Int J Mech Mater Des 9:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-012-9205-710.1007/s10999-012-9205-7 ↗
43. White SR, Kim YK (1998) Process-induced residual stress analysis of AS4/3501-6 composite material. Mech Compos Mater Struct 5:153–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1075941980894589710.1080/10759419808945897 ↗
44. Hill R (1965) Theory of mechanical properties of fibre-strengthened materials—III. Self-consistent model. J Mech Phys Solids 13:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(65)90008-610.1016/0022-5096(65)90008-6 ↗
45. Ersoy N, Garstka T, Potter K, Wisnom MR, Porter D, Clegg M et al (2010) Development of the properties of a carbon fibre reinforced thermosetting composite through cure. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 41:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.007 ↗
46. Lee SK (2002) Fabrication and characterization of carbon fiber textile reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Dissertation, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/10203/50240
47. Gou JJ, Dai YJ, Li S, Tao WQ (2015) Numerical study of effective thermal conductivities of plain woven composites by unit cells of different sizes. Int J Heat Mass Transf 91:829–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.07410.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.074 ↗
48. Lee SK, Byun JH, Hong SH (2003) Effect of fiber geometry on the elastic constants of the plain woven fabric reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 347:346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00614-710.1016/S0921-5093(02)00614-7 ↗
49. Kim DH, Kim SW (2023) Prediction of effective mechanical properties of 2D triaxially braided composites using a geometrical model incorporating flat portions of composite yarns. Mater Today Commun 35:106255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10625510.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106255 ↗
50. Lee SK, Byun JH, Hong SH (2004) CTE model of 3D orthogonal textile reinforced aluminum matrix composites. In: Proceedings of ACCM-4 Conference, Sydney, pp 1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85573-831-7.50181-410.1016/B978-1-85573-831-7.50181-4 ↗
51. Wijskamp S (2005) Shape distortions in composites forming. Universiteit Twente, Enschede