Fluid Thermodynamic Simulation of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy in Laser Wire Deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
A 3D numerical model of heat transfer and fluid flow of molten pool in the process of laser wire deposition was presented by computational fluid dynamics technique. The simulation results of the deposition morphology were also compared with the experimental results under the condition of liquid bridge transfer mode. Moreover, they showed a good agreement. Considering the effect of recoil pressure, the morphology of the deposit metal obtained by the simulation was similar to the experiment result. Molten metal at the wire tip was peeled off and flowed into the molten pool, and then spread to both sides of the deposition layer under the recoil pressure. In addition, the results of simulation and high-speed charge-coupled device presented that a wedge transition zone, with a length of ∼6 mm, was formed behind the keyhole in the liquid bridge transfer process, where the height of deposited metal decreased gradually. After solidification, metal in the transition zone retained the original melt morphology, resulting in a decrease in the height of the tail of the deposition layer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.01710.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.017 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.03310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.033 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.08510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.085 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.12.01310.1016/j.optlastec.2014.12.013 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12206-013-0218-410.1007/s12206-013-0218-4 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.12.01910.1016/j.optlastec.2016.12.019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.06.00710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.06.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.04.16410.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.04.164 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.08110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.081 ↗
10. Hu R, , Luo M, , Liu T, et al. Thermal fluid dynamics of liquid bridge transfer in laser wire deposition 3D printing. Sci Technolf Weld Join, 2019; 24:1–11.
11. 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.11.01410.1016/j.physleta.2005.11.014 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.027 ↗
13. Gerhard W, , Boyer RR, , Collings EW. Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys. ASM International: Almere, The Netherlands, 1994.
14. Colegrove P, , Simiand PE, , Varughese A, et al. Evaluation of a drilling model approach to represent laser spot microwelding. In: ASM Proceedings of the international conference: trends in welding research; 2009.
15. 10.1007/PL0002186810.1007/PL00021868 ↗
16. Shejndlin AE, , Kenisarin MM, , Chekhovskoj VY. Melting point of yttrium oxide. AN SSSR, 1974; 216:582–584.
17. 10.1088/0022-3727/39/24/03910.1088/0022-3727/39/24/039 ↗
18. 10.1007/s40194-015-0289-110.1007/s40194-015-0289-1 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-3-642-57813-710.1007/978-3-642-57813-7 ↗
20. 10.1088/0031-9112/35/3/02510.1088/0031-9112/35/3/025 ↗
21. 10.2351/1.164263610.2351/1.1642636 ↗
22. 10.1002/lapl.20111001010.1002/lapl.201110010 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2008.11.00210.1016/j.jqsrt.2008.11.002 ↗
24. Barber PW. Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1984; 98:290–291.10.1016/0021-9797(84)90512-5 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.03310.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.033 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11837-003-0134-710.1007/s11837-003-0134-7 ↗
27. 10.1243/09544062JMES178210.1243/09544062JMES1782 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00865-810.1016/S0924-0136(02)00865-8 ↗
29. 10.1103/RevModPhys.67.8510.1103/RevModPhys.67.85 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11663-014-0054-710.1007/s11663-014-0054-7 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0265014710.1007/BF02650147 ↗