Synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles of narrow size distribution on polysaccharide templates
Source abstract
Abstract
We report here the preparation of nanoparticles of iron oxide in the presence of polysaccharide templates. Interaction between iron (II) sulfate and template has been carried out in aqueous phase, followed by the selective and controlled removal of the template to achieve narrow distribution of particle size. Particles of iron oxide obtained have been characterized for their stability in solvent media, size, size distribution and crystallinity and found that when the negative value of the zeta potential increases, particle size decreases. A narrow particle size distribution with D100 = 275 nm was obtained with chitosan and starch templates. SEM measurements further confirm the particle size measurement. Diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectra values show that the template is completely removed from the final iron oxide particles and powder XRD measurements show that the peaks of the diffractogram are in agreement with the theoretical data of hematite. The salient observations of our study shows that there occurs a direct correlation between zeta potential, polydispersity index, bandgap energy and particle size. The crystallite size of the particles was found to be 30–35 nm. A large negative zeta potential was found to be advantageous for achieving lower particle sizes, owing to the particles remaining discrete without agglomeration.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Colvin V L, Schlamp M C and Alivisatos A P 1994 Nature 370 35410.1038/370354a0 ↗
2. Dormann J L, Bessais L and Fiorani D 1988 J. Phys. C21 2015
3. Guin Debanjan, Manorama Sunkara V, Radha S and Nigam A K 2006 Bull. Mater. Sci. 29 61710.1007/s12034-006-0013-2 ↗
4. Kesavan V, Sivanand S P, Chandrasekaran S, Koltypin Y and Gedanken A 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38 352110.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19991203)38:23<3521::AID-ANIE3521>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
5. Liu X M, Fu S Y, Xiao H M and Huang C J 2005 J. Solid State Chem. 178 279810.1016/j.jssc.2005.06.018 ↗
6. Morup S and Tronc E 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 327810.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3278 ↗
7. Rao C N R, Muller A and Cheetam A K (eds) 2004 The chemistry of nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties and applications (Weinheim: Wiley)
8. Rao K J, Mahesh Krishnamurthy and Kumar Sundeep 2005 Bull. Mater. Sci. 28 1910.1007/BF02711166 ↗
9. Sreeram K J, Indumathy R, Rajaram A, Nair B U and Ramasami T 2006 Mater. Res. Bull. 41 187510.1016/j.materresbull.2006.03.017 ↗
10. Sun S, Murray C B, Weller D, Folks L and Moser A 2004 Science 287 198910.1126/science.287.5460.1989 ↗
11. Suslick K S, Fang M and Hyeon T 1996 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 1196010.1021/ja961807n ↗