Evaluation of propane explosion with applied water mist
Source abstract
Abstract
This article discusses the overpressure of a gas explosion and the performance of applying water mist for explosion suppression. According to the experimental results, the larger the opening area, the more difficult it is for pressure to accumulate, resulting in lower overpressure of a gas explosion. When the opening was opened under a high air speed environment, the amount of entrained air was greater. Consequently, the occurrence time of the explosion was shorter than at a low air speed. Despite the water mist nozzle being installed outside the enclosure, a propane gas explosion still occurred regardless of the amount of water mist used, failing to suppress the explosion. However, the water mist nozzle installed inside the enclosure supplied an adequate amount of water mist that could wash a part of the propane, resulting in the fuel concentration dropping below the lower explosion limit, hindering the occurrence of an explosion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Combustion and Detonation Processes · Fire dynamics and safety research · Risk and Safety Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Department of Fire Protection Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0304-3894(97)81620-210.1016/S0304-3894(97)81620-2 ↗
2. Crowl DA · 1997
3. Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) · 1979
4. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) · 2004
5. 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.4-33710.3801/IAFSS.FSS.4-337 ↗
6. Chiu CW · 1996
7. Bukowski RW · Fire Eng J · 1996 · 56 · 14
8. 10.1007/s10694-008-0058-410.1007/s10694-008-0058-4 ↗
9. 10.1080/0010220760894674210.1080/00102207608946742 ↗
10. Tatem PA · 1994
11. 10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00012-X10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00012-X ↗
12. 10.1016/0950-4230(95)00002-I10.1016/0950-4230(95)00002-I ↗
13. 10.1016/0950-4230(95)00007-N10.1016/0950-4230(95)00007-N ↗
14. 10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.01910.1016/j.proci.2016.06.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.09.05710.1016/j.fuel.2016.09.057 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.03.01410.1016/j.jlp.2014.03.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.01710.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.017 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.02710.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.027 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.01610.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.016 ↗
20. 10.1002/prs.68022030510.1002/prs.680220305 ↗
21. Qin WX · J Combust Sci Technol · 2012 · 18 · 90
22. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.08.00510.1016/j.firesaf.2017.08.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.09.05910.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.09.059 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.00810.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.008 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.04010.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.040 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.11626510.1016/j.fuel.2019.116265 ↗