journal article·2021-09-15Open access

Effect of Skin Vibration and Friction on Tactile Sensations of Clothing Materials

Naomi Izu, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Mariko Sato

Abstract

Sense spots are distributed on the surface of the skin, and skin vibration affects the touch sensation. The Kawabata evaluation system method is used for hand evaluation of fabrics to provide reproducible tactile sensation. This study aimed to investigate the effect of mechanical stimulation of the skin on the fabric hands. The measurement of physical properties of clothing materials and the touch test were conducted on 12 types of textiles. Regarding physical properties, mechanical, moisture, and heat properties, as well as air permeability, were measured. During the touch test, mechanical stimulations of the skin (skin vibration and friction) for touching the textiles with fingertips were measured and the tactile sensation of the textiles (roughness, stiffness, stickiness, dryness, thermal sensation, comfort sensation, and preference) was evaluated. The effect of physical properties of the textiles and mechanical stimulations of the skin on the tactile sensation was analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the mechanical stimulations of the skin yielded a significant effect on the feeling of roughness, stiffness, dryness, thermal sensation, comfort sensation, and preference. Furthermore, although the evaluations of comfort and preference for the touch of textiles were similar, the friction stimulus of the skin affected the comfort, while skin vibration affected the preference. In conclusion, it is necessary to evaluate the tactile sensation of fabrics in consideration of the mechanical stimulation of the skin. We anticipate that our assay will contribute to making comfortable cloth designs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Color perception and design · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Fashion and Living Environment Studies, Bunka Gakuen University

Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. [1] M. J. Horn and L. M. Gural, The Second Skin, Houghton Mifflin Company (1981).
2. [2] S. Kawabata, The standardization and analysis of hand evaluation. 2nd ed, The Hand Evaluation and Standardization Committee, The Textile Machinery Society of Japan (1980).
3. [3] M. Enomoto et al., Journal of the Japan Research Association for Textile End-Uses, 58(9), 748 (2017).
4. [4] K. Kikegawa et al., Royal Society Open Science, 6(7), 190039 (2019).10.1098/rsos.190039 ↗
5. [5] J. Scheibert et al., Science, 323(5920), 1503 (2009).10.1126/science.1166467 ↗
6. [6] S. Derler et al., Tribol. Int., 42(11-12), 1565 (2009).10.1016/j.triboint.2008.11.009 ↗
7. [7] Y. Tanaka et al., 2015 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), 146 (2015).
8. [8] M. Natsume et al., 2017 26 th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 1479 (2017).10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172499 ↗
9. [9] K. Higashi et al., EuroHaptics 2016 Conference, 3 (2016).
10. [10] M. Sato et al., Descente sports science, 41, 10 (2020).
11. [11] S. Bensmaïa et al., Percept. Psychophys., 67, 842 (2005).10.3758/BF03193537 ↗
12. [12] E. R. Kandel et al., Principles of neural science 4 th edition, New York, McGraw-Hill (2000).
13. [13] M. Shimojo, Journal of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 41(10), 723 (2002).
14. [14] Nihon iryou kanri kyoukai kankouiinkai, Clothing comfort and function, Japan Association of Specialists in Textiles and Apparel (2016).
15. [15] J. Cohen, Psychol. Bull., 112(1), 155 (1992).10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 ↗
16. [16] M. Hollins and S. R. Risner, Percept. Psychophys., 62, 695 (2000).10.3758/BF03206916 ↗
17. [17] M. Shimojo et al., Tactile Recognition Mechanism and Applied Technology: Artificial Tactile Sensors / Displays, S&T Publishing Inc. (2010).
18. [18] M. Yamakawa et al., Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 37(12), 492(1984).10.4188/transjtmsj.37.12_P492 ↗
19. [19] A. Suzuki et al., Journal of the Society of Fiber Science and Technology, 29(2), T50 (1973).10.2115/fiber.29.2_T50 ↗
20. [20] S. Okamoto et al., IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 6(1), 81(2013).10.1109/TOH.2012.32 ↗
21. [21] S. Okamoto et al., IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, (2018).
22. [22] Y. Tanaka and S. Sukigara, Journal of Textile Engineering, 54(3), 75 (2008).10.4188/jte.54.75 ↗
23. [23] K. Suzuki et al., Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. C, 74(746), 2549 (2008).10.1299/kikaic.74.2549 ↗
24. [24] G. P. Chimata and C. J. Schwartz, Biotribology, 3, 11 (2015).10.1016/j.biotri.2015.09.002 ↗
25. [25] S. Kawabata and Y. Akagi, Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 30(1), T13 (1977).10.4188/transjtmsj.30.T13 ↗
26. [26] U. Lee and T. Tamura, Journal of Human and Living Environment, 2(1), 30 (1995).
27. [27] A. Klöcker et al., Plos one, 8(11), e79085 (2013).10.1371/journal.pone.0079085 ↗
28. [28] Y. Uchida et al., Journal of the Japan Research Association for Textile End-Uses, 60(2), 133 (2019).
29. [29] T. Yamamoto, Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 53(3), 103 (2000).10.4188/transjtmsj.53.3_P103 ↗
30. [30] T. Nishimatsu et al., Journal of Textile Engineering, 60(6), 91 (2014).10.4188/jte.60.91 ↗
31. [31] M. Kergoat et al., Food. Qual. Prefer., 21(2), 178 (2010).10.3406/raipr.2011.4300 ↗