Electrospun Nanofiber Mat of α-1,3-Glucan Butenoate and Its Surface Modification via Thiol-Ene Reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
α-1,3-glucan ester with carbon-carbon double bonds (C=C), namely, α-1,3-glucan butenoate (α13GB) was synthesized from 3-butenoic acid and trifluoroacetic anhydride. Nonwoven nanofiber mat was successfully prepared by electrospinning α13GB / HFIP solution. α13GB had many reactive vinyl groups in its ester groups that could attribute to thiol-ene reaction, making it possible to modify the nanofiber mat surface by one step chemical functionalization using thiol-ene reactions. The surface of nanofiber mat was modified with 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecanethiol (PFD) or 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol (MPD) via thiol-ene reactions. Attenuated total reflection-Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) analyses revealed that the surface of the nanofiber mat was successfully modified with these thiol compounds. The water contact angle (WCA) of the surface of each nanofiber mat was measured to evaluate its wettability changes, and indicated the mat modified with PFD showed super-hydrophobicity (WCA>150̊). Furthermore, the morphology of nanofiber was successfully maintained even after modification by adjusting reaction time.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Science of Polymeric Materials, Department of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] L. Crépy, V. Miri, N. Joly, P. Martin, and J. Lefebvre, Carbohydr. Polym., 83, 1812 (2011).10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.045 ↗
2. [2] Y. Enomoto-Rogers, Y. Ohmomo, and T. Iwata, Carbohydr. Polym. 92, 1827 (2013).10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.043 ↗
3. [3] N. G. V. Fundador, Y. Enomoto-Rogers, A. Takemura, and T. Iwata, Polymer (Guildf)., 53, 3885 (2012).10.1016/j.polymer.2012.06.038 ↗
4. [4] T. Danjo, Y. Enomoto-Rogers, A. Takemura, and T.Iwata, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 109, 373 (2014).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.05.023 ↗
5. [5] H. Gan, Y. Enomoto, T. Kabe, D. Ishii, T. Hikima, M.Takata, and T. Iwata, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 145, 142 (2017).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.05.011 ↗
6. [6] S. Puanglek, S. Kimura, and T. Iwata, Carbohydr. Polym., 169, 245 (2017).10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.015 ↗
7. [7] P. X. Ma, R. Zhang, and J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 46, 60 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199907)46:1<60::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
8. [8] D. H. Reneker and I. Chun, Nanotechnology., 7, 216 (1996).10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/009 ↗
9. [9] K. Y. Lee, L. Jeong, Y. O. Kang, S. J. Lee, and W. H. Park, Adv. DrugDeliv. Rev., 61, 1020 (2009).10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.006 ↗
10. [10] B. Ghorani, S. J. Russell, and P. Goswami, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2013, 256161 (2013).10.1155/2013/256161 ↗
11. [11] K. Sakurai, Y. Kishida, and T. Sasaki, Chitin and Chitosan Research., 18, 3 (2012).
12. [12] C. W. Kim, D. S. Kim, S. Y. Kang, M. Marquez, and Y.L. Joo, Polymer (Guildf)., 47, 5097 (2006).10.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.033 ↗
13. [13] J. W. Lu, Y. L. Zhu, Z. X. Guo, P. Hu, and J. Yu, Polymer (Guildf)., 47, 8026 (2006).10.1016/j.polymer.2006.09.027 ↗
14. [14] Y. Zhou, D. Yang, X. Chen, Q. Xu, F. Lu, and J. Nie, Biomacromolecules., 9, 349 (2008).10.1021/bm7009015 ↗
15. [15] M. Miyauchi, J. Miao, and T. J. Simmons, J. Chromatogr. Sep. Tech., 2, 1000110 (2011).
16. [16] Y. Dan, M. Buzhor, D. Raichman, E. Menashe, O. Rachmani, and E. Amir, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 138,1 (2021).10.1002/app.49820 ↗
17. [17] W. W. Gao, G.X. Zhang, and F. X. Zhang, Cellulose.,22, 2787 (2015).10.1007/s10570-015-0641-z ↗
18. [18] J. Zhao, Q. Shi, S. Luan, L. Song, H. Yang, H. Shi, J. Jin, X. Li, J. Yin, and P. Stagnaro, J. Memb. Sci., 369, 5 (2011).10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.046 ↗
19. [19] C. Zhou, Z. Chen, H. Yang, K. Hou, X. Zeng, Y. Zheng, and J. Cheng, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces., 9, 9184 (2017).10.1021/acsami.7b00412 ↗
20. [20] B. Deng, R. Cai, Y. Yu, H. Jiang, C. Wang, J. Li, L. Li, M. Yu, J. Li, L. Xie, Q. Huang, and C. Fan, Adv. Mater., 22, 5473 (2010).10.1002/adma.201002614 ↗
21. [21] Y. Hori, Y. Enomoto, S. Kimura, and T. Iwata, Polym. Int., doi:10.1002/pi.6157 (2020).10.1002/pi.6157 ↗
22. [22] S. Puanglek, S. Kimura, Y. Enomoto-Rogers, T. Kabe, M. Yoshida, M. Wada, and T. Iwata, Sci. Rep., 6, 1 (2016).10.1038/srep30479 ↗
23. [23] H. Fong, I. Chun, and D. H. Reneker, Polymer (Guildf)., 40, 4585 (1999).10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00068-3 ↗
24. [24] P. Bébin and R. E. PrudʼHomme, J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys., 39, 2363 (2001).
25. [25] A. Celebioglu and T. Uyar, Mater. Lett., 65, 2291 (2011).10.1016/j.matlet.2011.04.039 ↗