Estimation of Fiber-Fiber Interactions in Cellulose Fiber Sheets via Relationship between Fiber Network Density and Cross-Linking Point
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding fiber-fiber interactions in materials using cellulose nanofibril (CNF) is essential for advancing bio-based material design. This study investigates the relationship between fiber network density and crosslinking points to estimate inter-fiber interactions in CNF sheets. The sheets were prepared from CNFs obtained from bacterial cellulose pellicle and bamboo pulp dispersions, subjected to various drying and solvent exchange conditions. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were processed and analyzed using SOAX software to quantify crosslinking points. Tensile tests were conducted to evaluate mechanical properties, and interaction energy per crosslinking point was calculated. The results showed that solvent exchange with ethanol increased the apparent number of crosslinking points but reduced the calculated interaction energy, suggesting weaker inter-fiber bonding. The estimated interaction energies ranged from values comparable to moderate hydrogen bonds to those dipole–dipole interactions, depending on the preparation methods. This approach provides a simple and effective method to estimate fiber–fiber interaction energy from network density and mechanical data, offering valuable insights for CNF-based material development.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Isogai, Sen’i Gakkaishi, 69, 132 (2013).10.2115/fiber.69.P_132 ↗
2. T. Kondo, KONA Powder Particle J., 40, 109 (2023)10.14356/kona.2023003 ↗
3. G. Ishikawa, T. Tsuji, S. Tagawa, and T. Kondo, Macromolecules, 54, 9393 (2021).10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01163 ↗
4. S. Hesrin and M. Scharamm, Biochem J., 58, 345 (1954).
5. H. Utsunomiya, Y. Tsujita, and T. Kondo, Cellulose, 29, 2899 (2022).10.1007/s10570-021-04231-9 ↗
6. K. Tsuboi, S. Yokota, and T. Kondo, Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J., 29, 69 (2014).10.3183/npprj-2014-29-01-p069-076 ↗
7. D. Nečas and P. Klapetek, Cent. Eur. J. Phys., 10, 181 (2012).10.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗
8. J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-Y. Tinevez, D. J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, and A. Cardona, Nature Methods, 9, 676 (2012).10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
9. T. Xu, D. Vavylonis, F. Tsai, G. H. Koenderink, W. Nie, E. Yusuf, I-Ju Lee, J.-Q. Wu, and X. Huang, Scientific Reports, 5, 1 (2015).10.1038/srep09081 ↗
10. G. Takayama and T. Kondo, Carbohydr. Polym., 313, 121311 (2023).10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121311 ↗
11. K. P. C. Vollhardt and N. E. Schore, “Organic Chemistry: Structure and Function”, 3rd ed., Freeman, New York (1999).
12. P. W. Atkins, “Physical Chemistry”, 6th ed., Freeman, New York (1998).
13. G. C. Pimentel and A. L. McClellan, “The Hydrogen Bond”, Freeman, New York (1960).