Enhancement of Regenerated Curdlan Fibers with High Wet-Ductility via Post-Drawing in Water
Source abstract
Abstract
Biomass-derived biodegradable fibers have attracted considerable attention as sustainable alternatives to petroleum-derived non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. Curdlan, a linear β-1,3-glucan, is a promising renewable resource that exhibits unique physicochemical properties owing to its triple-helical crystalline structure. The regenerated fibers of curdlan can be fabricated by wet spinning; these fibers exhibit excellent ductility but poor mechanical strength compared to other polysaccharides such as cellulose. In this study, a new post-treatment was developed to enhance the mechanical properties of regenerated curdlan fibers by exploiting their high ductility when swollen with water. Curdlan was dry-jet wet spun using an ionic liquid as the solvent and water as the coagulant. The regenerated fibers were subsequently post-drawn in water to a maximum of four times the original fiber length, followed by air-drying. The resultant fiber showed a 1.4-fold increase in the briefringence (Δn) value, which represents the orientation degree; moreover, the tensile strength was two times higher (20 cN tex‒1; 300 MPa) than that of the untreated fiber. It was also observed that an increase in the degree of post-drawing was more effective in enhancing the regenerated curdlan fiber than an increase in the initial draw ratio from 10 to 20 during wet spinning.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Wood Chemistry, Division of Fundamental Agriscience Research, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University
Laboratory of Science of Polymeric Materials, Department of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences
Now at Polymer Chemistry Group, Research Institute for Sustainable Chemistry, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
Technology Advancement Center, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. R. Zhang and K. J. Edgar, Biomacromolecules, 15 (4), 1079 (2014).10.1021/bm500038g ↗
2. T. Norisuye, T. Yanaki, and H. Fujita, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 18 (3), 547 (1980).10.1002/pol.1980.180180314 ↗
3. N. Kasai and T. Harada, ACS Symp. Ser., 141, 363 (1980).10.1021/bk-1980-0141.ch024 ↗
4. Z. Cai and H. Zhang, Food Hydrocoll., 68, 128 (2017).10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.014 ↗
5. T. Funami, M. Funami, H. Yada, and Y. Nakao, Food Hydrocoll., 13 (4), 317 (1999).10.1016/S0268-005X(99)00014-4 ↗
6. C. T. Chuah, A. Sarko, T. Deslandes, and R. H. Marchessault, Macromolecules, 16 (8), 1375 (2002).10.1021/ma00242a020 ↗
7. G. Fittolani, P. H. Seeberger, and M. Delbianco, Pept. Sci., 112 (1), e24124 (2019).10.1002/pep2.24124 ↗
8. M. Numata and S. Shinkai, Chem. Commun., 47 (7), 1961 (2011).10.1039/c0cc03133j ↗
9. R. H. Marchessault, T. Deslandes, K. Ogawa, and P. R. Sundararajan, Can. J. Chem., 55 (2), 300 (1977).10.1139/v77-045 ↗
10. O. A. El Seoud, A. Koschella, L. C. Fidale, S. Dorn, and T. Heinze, Biomacromolecules, 8 (9), 2629 (2007).10.1021/bm070062i ↗
11. H. Liu, Y. Li, J. Gao, A. Shi, L. Liu, H. Hu, N. Putri, H. Yu, W. Fan, and Q. Wang, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 84, 394 (2016).10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.12.014 ↗
12. W. Bai, F. Shah, Q. Wang, and H. Liu, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 130, 922 (2019).10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.223 ↗
13. S. Suzuki, A. Togo, H. Gan, S. Kimura, and T. Iwata, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 9 (11), 4247 (2021).10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00488 ↗
14. S. Suzuki, A. Togo, and T. Iwata, Polym. J., 54 (4), 493 (2021).10.1038/s41428-021-00573-0 ↗
15. S. Suzuki, A. Togo, S. Kimura, and T. Iwata, Green Chem., 24 (6), 2567 (2022).10.1039/D1GC04336F ↗
16. H. Sixta, A. Michud, L. Hauru, D. Asaadi, Y. Ma, A. W. T. King, I. Kilpeläinen, and M. Hummel, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J., 30 (1), 43 (2015).10.3183/npprj-2015-30-01-p043-057 ↗
17. M. D. Flamini, T. Lima, K. Corkum, N. J. Alvarez, and V. Beachley, Mater. Adv., 3 (7), 3303 (2022).10.1039/D1MA01183A ↗
18. W. Huang, Y. Shi, P. Wang, Q. Yang, G. Gobius du Sart, Y. Zhou, C. A. P. Joziasse, R. Wang, and P. Chen, Polymer, 246, 124743 (2022).10.1016/j.polymer.2022.124743 ↗
19. K. Komiyama, T. Omura, T. Kabe, and T. Iwata, Polymer, 247, 124772 (2022).10.1016/j.polymer.2022.124772 ↗
20. Y. Liu, Q. Gu, F. K. Ofosu, and X. Yu, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 81, 498 (2015).10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.045 ↗
21. M. Xiao, M. Jiang, K. Wu, H. Yang, X. Ni, W. Yan, G. O. Phillips, and F. Jiang, Food Hydrocoll., 70, 57 (2017).10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.03.018 ↗
22. H. Saito, M. Yokoi, and Y. Yoshioka, Macromolecules, 22 (10), 3892 (2002).10.1021/ma00200a014 ↗
23. A. Togo, S. Suzuki, S. Kimura, and T. Iwata, ACS Omega, 6 (31), 20361 (2021).10.1021/acsomega.1c02365 ↗