Polyurethane Nanofiber Artificial Leather with Improved Mechanical Properties and High Moisture Permeability Prepared by Electrospinning-in-situ Crosslinking
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reports a method for preparing artificial leather with high comfort and useful mechanical property. Blending thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer (TPU), Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) polyurethane prepolymer and 4,4-Methylene bis(2-chloroaniline) (MOCA), and a nanofiber artificial leather was obtained by using online reactive electrospinning technology and heat cross-linking. Compared with the commercial PU artificial leather, the tensile strength of nanofiber artificial leather from 3.2 MPa to 11.2 MPa, and the air permeability of nanofiber artificial leather from 0.25 to 2.974 mm/s, and the moisture permeability of nanofiber artificial leather from 981 to 4615 g/m2.24h. The NCO groups on the TPU and TDI prepolymer molecules, and the NH2 groups on the MOCA cross-linking agent were polymerized by heat treatment, and a cohesive structure was formed between fibers, which significantly improve the mechanical property of nanofiber artificial leather. It was close to sheep leather in mechanical property, and it was air permeability and moisture permeability were much higher than those of sheep leather and commercial PU artificial leather. The nanofiber artificial leather prepared in this study has excellent prospects for application in the fields of luggage, footwear, and clothing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile and Apparel Industry Research Institute, Zhongyuan University of Technology
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. EuiKyung R., J Eng. Fiber. Fabr., 15, 1 (2019).
2. Shuhei W., Extile Research Journal, 91 , 1 (2021).
3. Babcock A. B. and Kittredge W. R. The use of scrap leather for artificial leather soles[D]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1943).
4. Kazuo H., Synthetic Leather Having Excellent Moisture Permeability[p]. Japan, JP2566799 (1996) 12-25.
5. Haruo I., Ioshikatsu M. and Masuhiro M. Pruduction of Sythetic Leather[p]. China:101481459 (2009) 07-15.
6. Iannace S., Di M. E and Nicolais L., Cell. Polym., 20, 321 (2001).10.1177/026248930102000502 ↗
7. BANUŠKEVIČIŪTĖ A., ADOMAVIČIŪTĖE, M. R., Mater. Sci., 19, 178 (2013).10.5755/j01.ms.19.2.4435 ↗
8. Sahay R., Kumar P. S., Sridhar R., et al., Journal of Adv. Chem. Ser., 22, 12953 (2012).10.1039/c2jm30966a ↗
9. Hu J., Wang X., Ding B., et al., Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 32, 1729 (2011).10.1002/marc.201100343 ↗
10. Sheng J., Zhang M., Luo W., et al., Rsc. Advances, 6, 29629 (2016).10.1039/C5RA27913E ↗
11. He F., Fan J. and Chan L. H., Adv. Polym. Sci., 26, 817 (2014).10.1177/0954008314531030 ↗
12. Lin J., Wang X., Ding B., et al., Crc. Cr. Rev. Sol. State., 37, 94 (2012).10.1080/10408436.2011.627096 ↗
13. He F., Fan J. and Chan L., Adv. Polym. Sci, 26, 817 (2014).10.1177/0954008314531030 ↗
14. Wen Z., Xi Y., Yang L., et al., ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 13, 2081 (2021).
15. Jian F. Ge., et al., Journal of Fiber Bioengineering & Informatics, 5, 399 (2012).10.3993/jfbi12201205 ↗
16. Khil M. S., Cha D. L. and Kim H. Y., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B, 67, 675 (2003).10.1002/jbm.b.10058 ↗
17. Crane L. W., Dynes P. J. and Kaelble D. H., Polym. Sci.: Polymer Letter Edition, 11, 533 (1973).10.1002/pol.1973.130110808 ↗
18. Narayan R., Chattopadhyay D.K., Sreedhar B., et al., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 99, 68 (2006).10.1002/app.22430 ↗
19. Jianfeng Ge., Yang S., et al., The Royal Society of Chemistry, 8, 2248 (2013).
20. Xuejie Y., Mei Y. H., Tao Z., Dongya Y. and Fengxian Q., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 12, 12285 (2020).10.1021/acsami.9b20865 ↗
21. Zhengming H., Zhang Y. Z., Kotaki M., et al., Compos. Sci. Technol., 63, 2223 (2003).10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 ↗
22. Zanobetti A. and Oncill, M. S., Curr.Epidemiol.Rep. 5, 125 (2018).10.1007/s40471-018-0150-3 ↗
23. Zhang X., Yang D., Qiu F. and Li Z., J. Clean. Prod. 199, 411 (2018).10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.181 ↗
24. Mercer, J. B., Environ. Res. 92, 8 (2003).10.1016/S0013-9351(02)00009-9 ↗
25. Cui Y., Gong H., Wang Y., Li D. and Bai H., Adv. Mater. 30, 1706807 (2018).10.1002/adma.201706807 ↗
26. Grojean R. E., Sousa J. A. and Henry M. C., Appl. Opt. 19, 339 (1980).10.1364/AO.19.000339 ↗
27. Shi N. N., Tsai C. C., Camino F., Bernard G. D., Yu N. and Wehner R., Sci., 349, 966 (2015).10.1126/science.aab3564 ↗
28. Schreder-Gibson H., Gibson P., Us Army Soldier Systems Lent, 23, 5020 (2004).