journal article·2022-01-01Open access

Determination of the Most Convenient Polyester Thread Supplier in Upholstery Velvet Production by Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Case from Turkey

Arslan Hakan Murat, Serhat Ata, Hakan Tahiri Mutlu

Abstract

Upholstery velvet manufacturers choose polyester thread types to get optimum profit by using scientific methods. The matter of determining the most convenient polyester thread supplier might be considered as a decision problem. In this study, the issue of determining the most suitable polyester thread supplier of upholstery velvet manufacturer was analyzed by MACBETH-PROMETHEE Hybrid method. Authorities of relevant businesses were chosen as decision makers. Criteria and alternatives were determined by reviewing literature regarding decision makers. The weights of criteria were evaluated by MACBETH method, however, the priority order of alternatives were evaluated separately both MACBETH and PROMETHEE methods. The fit of analyses practiced by two separate multi criteria decision making methods was tested by Spearman Rank Correlation Analysis. As a result of analyses conducted hybrid method, types of brands and threads were determined. The most basic raw material requirement of enterprises that are upholstery velvet producers is polyester thread. If thread is procured using the model of the study, polyester thread will be purchased at both the most affordable price and the desired quality. Findings were shared with authorities of relevant business.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Quality Function Deployment in Product Design · Quality and Management Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Business, Düzce University

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. F. Walter and J. Mike, Textiles in automotive engineering. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, England, 25 (2000).
2. B. Fatma Nur; B. Gülşen Şefika, Color Factor in The Relief Perception of Woven Fabrics. International Journal of New Trends in Social Sciences, 2(2), 66 (2018).10.18844/ijntss.v2i2.3870 ↗
3. T. Onur, Fantazi iplik kullanımının örme kumaş performansına etkileri, Masterʼs Thesis. Uludağ Üniversitesi (2007).
4. C. Shankar, C. Prasenjit and P, Kanika, Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series E, 99(1), 63 (2018).10.1007/s40032-017-0420-8 ↗
5. Ç. Sezin and Ü. Can, The Journal of The Textile Institute, 112(4), 538 (2021).10.1080/00405000.2020.1768021 ↗
6. H. Yan, Z. Xianyi, B. Pascal, C. Yan and Z. Xujing, Text. Res. J., 88(23), 2682 (2018).
7. K. Umutgül and Ö. Eren, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Research in Business, Management and Economics, Dublin, Republic of Ireland (2020).
8. M. Ashis, Research Journal of Textile and Apparel (2021).
9. İ. Zahide, Dokuma Tekniği II, 1989, Ankara: Sistem Ofset, 144 (1989).
10. Y. Zerrin and Y. Mehmet, Tekstil Terbiye Teknolojisi Kasar’dan-Apre’ye, İstanbul: Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon Araştırma Merkezi (1995).
11. K. Erdem, Z. Belkıs and A. Aysun, Tekstil Teknoloji Dergisi, 179 (2005).
12. M. Scott and P. Nancy, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 3(4), 1 (2004).
13. V. Mark and H. Patrick, International journal of operations research, (10)2, 56 (2013).
14. Y. B. Fatih, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme, 2019, Retrieved from: https://bahadirfyildirim.com/blog/serie/cok-kriterli-karar-verme/
15. E. Costa, C. A, B. Oliveira and Rui Carvalho, European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2), 380 (2002).10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00253-3 ↗
16. K. Nilsen, Alphanumeric Journal, 4(1), 17 (2016).
17. K. Prasad and C. Shankar, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(2), 259 (2013).10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.01.002 ↗
18. D. C. Jean-Marie, V. Jean-Claude and B. E. C. Carlos, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 11(2), 359 (2012).
19. B. E. Costa, C. A. D. Costa-Lobo and M.L. R. Isabel, Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria (2002).
20. B. E. Costa, C. D. Corte and V. Jean- Marie, Operational Research Working Papers, 3, 56 (2003).
21. E. Emel and K. Nilsen, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1) 83 (2017).10.5578/jss.53866 ↗
22. K. C. Deniz and K. Ozan, Bir Konfeksiyon İşletmesinde MACBETH ve TOPSIS Yöntemleri ile Tedarikçi Seçimi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 21(62), 331 (2019).10.21205/deufmd.2019216202 ↗
23. D. Metin and E. Ergün, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1) (2008).
24. G. Tolga, Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 133 (2013).
25. V. J. Pierre, Management Science, 31(6), 647 (1985).10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647 ↗
26. B. Abdelfettah, M. Jean-Marc and C. Habib, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(4), 269 (2002).10.1002/mcda.334 ↗
27. B. Serkan, K. Bahadir and K. Serdar, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 139 (2007).
28. A. Amir, C. S. Kamal and E. Akbar, European journal of operational research, 177(2), 673 (2007).10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.022 ↗
29. A. Ceyhun and O. Irem, International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 563 (2005).
30. A. K. Barış and U. Aydın, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 161 (2009).
31. A. G. Cenk and D. Erhan, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(1), 319 (2010).
32. A. Güler, T. Eren and T. Mehmet, Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 32(1), 12 (2021).10.46465/endustrimuhendisligi.789642 ↗
33. K. Nilgün and T. Fatma, Verimlilik Dergisi, 3, 83 (2012).