Image Analysis for Evaluating Uniformity in Synthetic Fiber Properties Using Limit Samples
Source abstract
Abstract
In the manufacturing of synthetic fibers, uniformity of the fiber properties is a critical quality control parameter. Currently, visual assessment by expert inspectors is the predominant method for evaluating the uniformity of synthetic fiber. A quantitative evaluation method using image analysis was investigated to establish a more accurate and efficient approach. As a fundamental step, this study focused on quantifying the evaluation scale of limit samples. The limit sample was a dye-circular plain-knitted fabric comprising five units, each of which was assigned a grade of fiber or yarn quality. The uniformity of synthetic fiber properties, especially the degree of streaky dyeing unevenness observed in dye-circular plain-knitted fabrics, was demonstrated to be expressed using image features. The image features were statistics about the gray-level gradients in the wale direction, obtained by horizontal edge detection on an image with loops removed by low-pass filtering. Furthermore, these image features and grade values representing synthetic fiber uniformity exhibited a linear relationship with a remarkably high coefficient of determination.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Textile materials and evaluations · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan
TMT Machinery, Inc., KYOTO Technical Center 136, Takeda-Mukaishiro-cho, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto 612-8686, Japan
Advanced Manufacturing Technology Institute, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. T. Suwa, M. Uno, and A. Shiomi, J. Text. Mach. Soc. Jpn., 18(9), T600 (1965).10.4188/transjtmsj1965b.18.T600 ↗
2. R.A. Sanfokd, E.K. Clardy, and M.L. Miller, Text. Res. J., 44(12), 952 (1974).10.1177/004051757404401207 ↗
3. C. J. Kok, P. J. Kruger, R. Lake, R. Turner, and N. Van Der Vlist, J. Text. Inst., 66(5), 186 (1975).10.1080/00405007508630481 ↗
4. C. Yamazaki, Sen’i Gakkaishi, 39(3), P88 (1983).10.2115/fiber.39.3_P88 ↗
5. N. Yoshida, T. Nakayama, N. Tsuchida, and C. Yamazaki, Sen’i Gakkaishi, 33(9), T386 (1977).10.2115/fiber.33.9_T386 ↗
6. J. Liu, H. Jiang, R. Pan, W. Gao, and M. Xu, Text. Res. J., 82(10), 1026 (2012).10.1177/0040517511431320 ↗
7. H. Zhang, S. Cheng, Y. Zhao, J. Jing, Z. Su, and P. Li, J. Text. Inst., 115(4), 600 (2024).10.1080/00405000.2023.2201997 ↗
8. H. Y. T. Ngan, G. K. H. Pang, N. H. C. Yung, Image Vis. Comput., 29(7), 442 (2011).10.1016/j.imavis.2011.02.002 ↗
9. A. Rasheed, B. Zafar, A. Rasheed, N. Ali, M. Sajid, S. H. Dar, U. Habib, T. Shehryar, M. T. Mahmood, Math. Probl. Eng., 2020(1), Article ID 8189403 (2020).10.1155/2020/8189403 ↗
10. C. Li, J. Li, Y. Li, L. He, X. Fu, J. Chen, Secur. Commun. Netw., 2021(1), Article ID 9948808 (2021).10.1155/2021/9948808 ↗
11. Y. Kahraman, A. Durmuşoğlu, Text. Res. J., 93(5-6), 1485 (2023).10.1177/00405175221130773 ↗
12. C. Xu, L. Xu, K. Luo, J. Zhang, A. Sitahong, M. Yang, and C. Zhang, J. Text. Inst., 116(10), 2286 (2025).10.1080/00405000.2024.2426257 ↗
13. G. Xie, Y. Xu, Z. Yu, and Y. Sun, J. Text. Inst., 113(1), 159 (2022).10.1080/00405000.2020.1866280 ↗
14. Y. Hu, and G. Jiang, Text. Res. J., 93(9-10), 2409 (2023).10.1177/00405175221137010 ↗