journal article·2026-07-10Open access

Image Analysis for Evaluating Uniformity in Synthetic Fiber Properties Using Limit Samples

Lina Wakako, Kazuhiro Kawamoto, Kinzo Hashimoto, Kinari Toshiyasu

Abstract

In the manufacturing of synthetic fibers, uniformity of the fiber properties is a critical quality control parameter. Currently, visual assessment by expert inspectors is the predominant method for evaluating the uniformity of synthetic fiber. A quantitative evaluation method using image analysis was investigated to establish a more accurate and efficient approach. As a fundamental step, this study focused on quantifying the evaluation scale of limit samples. The limit sample was a dye-circular plain-knitted fabric comprising five units, each of which was assigned a grade of fiber or yarn quality. The uniformity of synthetic fiber properties, especially the degree of streaky dyeing unevenness observed in dye-circular plain-knitted fabrics, was demonstrated to be expressed using image features. The image features were statistics about the gray-level gradients in the wale direction, obtained by horizontal edge detection on an image with loops removed by low-pass filtering. Furthermore, these image features and grade values representing synthetic fiber uniformity exhibited a linear relationship with a remarkably high coefficient of determination.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Textile materials and evaluations · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan

TMT Machinery, Inc., KYOTO Technical Center 136, Takeda-Mukaishiro-cho, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto 612-8686, Japan

Advanced Manufacturing Technology Institute, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. T. Suwa, M. Uno, and A. Shiomi, J. Text. Mach. Soc. Jpn., 18(9), T600 (1965).10.4188/transjtmsj1965b.18.T600 ↗
2. R.A. Sanfokd, E.K. Clardy, and M.L. Miller, Text. Res. J., 44(12), 952 (1974).10.1177/004051757404401207 ↗
3. C. J. Kok, P. J. Kruger, R. Lake, R. Turner, and N. Van Der Vlist, J. Text. Inst., 66(5), 186 (1975).10.1080/00405007508630481 ↗
4. C. Yamazaki, Sen’i Gakkaishi, 39(3), P88 (1983).10.2115/fiber.39.3_P88 ↗
5. N. Yoshida, T. Nakayama, N. Tsuchida, and C. Yamazaki, Sen’i Gakkaishi, 33(9), T386 (1977).10.2115/fiber.33.9_T386 ↗
6. J. Liu, H. Jiang, R. Pan, W. Gao, and M. Xu, Text. Res. J., 82(10), 1026 (2012).10.1177/0040517511431320 ↗
7. H. Zhang, S. Cheng, Y. Zhao, J. Jing, Z. Su, and P. Li, J. Text. Inst., 115(4), 600 (2024).10.1080/00405000.2023.2201997 ↗
8. H. Y. T. Ngan, G. K. H. Pang, N. H. C. Yung, Image Vis. Comput., 29(7), 442 (2011).10.1016/j.imavis.2011.02.002 ↗
9. A. Rasheed, B. Zafar, A. Rasheed, N. Ali, M. Sajid, S. H. Dar, U. Habib, T. Shehryar, M. T. Mahmood, Math. Probl. Eng., 2020(1), Article ID 8189403 (2020).10.1155/2020/8189403 ↗
10. C. Li, J. Li, Y. Li, L. He, X. Fu, J. Chen, Secur. Commun. Netw., 2021(1), Article ID 9948808 (2021).10.1155/2021/9948808 ↗
11. Y. Kahraman, A. Durmuşoğlu, Text. Res. J., 93(5-6), 1485 (2023).10.1177/00405175221130773 ↗
12. C. Xu, L. Xu, K. Luo, J. Zhang, A. Sitahong, M. Yang, and C. Zhang, J. Text. Inst., 116(10), 2286 (2025).10.1080/00405000.2024.2426257 ↗
13. G. Xie, Y. Xu, Z. Yu, and Y. Sun, J. Text. Inst., 113(1), 159 (2022).10.1080/00405000.2020.1866280 ↗
14. Y. Hu, and G. Jiang, Text. Res. J., 93(9-10), 2409 (2023).10.1177/00405175221137010 ↗