Impact Response and Energy Distribution of Low Velocity Impact on Composite Laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
The dynamic characteristics of composite laminates are very complex because many concurrent phenomena occur with laminate failure under impact load. In order to research impact response and energy distribution of composite laminates in different low-impacted energies, Hashin failure criteria was taken based on the finite element software of ABAQUS, combined progressive damage stiffness reduction scheme with viscous regularization. The impact response was analyzed from the points of impact energy, contact pressure,internal energy and damage dissipation energy. The result showed that the peak of contact pressure moved forward and the different value of internal energy and damage dissipation energy became bigger with the increase of impact energy. Furthermore, impact energy would be transformed into many types of energies and the distribution of impact energy was discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering College, Air Force Engineering University
Shijiazhuang flying college, Air Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
Air command operation institute, Naval research institute
Aviation center maintenance base, Air Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
Air Force’s military representative office, Air Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] Davies G A O, Zhang X. Int J Impact Eng, 16, 149 (1995).10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y ↗
2. [2] Schoeppner G A, Abrate S. Compos Part A-APPL S, 31, 903 (2000).10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00061-0 ↗
3. [3] Feraboli P J, Kedward K T. Compos Sci Technol, 66, 1336 (2006).10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.09.009 ↗
4. [4] Feraboli P J, Kedward K T. AIAA Journal, 42, 2143 (2004).10.2514/1.4534 ↗
5. [5] Feraboli P J. J Aircraft, 43, 1710 (2006).10.2514/1.19251 ↗
6. [6] Jung-Seok Kim, Seong-Kyun Chung. Compos Struct, 77, 484 (2007).10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.020 ↗
7. [7] Kumar S, Rao BN, Pradhan B. J Reinf Plast Compos, 26, 1273 (2007).10.1177/0731684407079367 ↗
8. [8] Lopes C S, Camanho P P, Gurdal Z, Maini P,Gonzaez E V. Compos Sci Technol, 69, 937 (2009).10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.015 ↗
9. [9] Kim S J, Goo NS, Kim TW. Compos Sci Technol, 51,763 (1997).10.1016/S0266-3538(97)80015-2 ↗
10. [10] Tarfaoui M, Gning PB, Hamitouche L. Composites Part A, 39, 1 (2008).10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.001 ↗
11. [11] Volnei Tita, Jonas de Carvalho, Dirk Vandepitte. Compos Struct, 83, 413 (2008).10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.003 ↗
12. [12] Setoodeh AR, Malekzadeh P, Nikbin K. Mater Des, 30, 3795 (2009).10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.031 ↗
13. [13] Wang Y F, Zhang X J, Wang H. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 34, 63 (2013).10.3901/JME.2013.01.063 ↗
14. [14] Sun CT, Chen JK. J Comput Math, 19, 490 (1985).10.1177/002199838501900601 ↗
15. [15] Hashin Z., J Compos Mater, 7, 448 (1973).10.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
16. [16] HASHIN Z. J Appl Mech-T ASME, 47, 329 (1980).10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
17. [17] HASHIN Z. J Appl Mech-T ASME, 48, 846 (1981).10.1115/1.3157744 ↗
18. [18] Yi P Y, Yu Z F, Wang H. Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics, 33, 469 (2012).10.1088/1674-1137/33/6/013 ↗
19. [19] LINDE P, PLEITNER J, BOER H, CARMONE C. ABAQUS Users Conference (2004).