journal article·2026-04Open access

Laser induced crystal formation of layered molybdenum trioxide

Rami Elkaffas, Israr Ahmed, Murad Ali, Shanavas Shajahan, Dalaver Anjum, Haider Butt, Yarjan Abdul Samad

Abstract

Abstract Layered transition metal oxides (TMOs) have been utilized for centuries due to their abundance and diverse applications across various fields. Developing efficient synthesis methods of layered TMOs is crucial for exploring novel properties and potential applications. This work introduces Laser Induced Molybdenum trioxide (LIM), a direct laser synthesis method for producing transition metal oxides and crystals. We outline the laser synthesis protocol for successfully synthesizing layered transition metal oxides using alpha molybdenum trioxide as a representative example. Compared to state-of-the-art (SOTA) techniques, such as hydrothermal, spray pyrolysis, and others, the direct laser process is simple, requiring only a 450 nm monochromatic blue laser light source and minimal handling, and it is also scalable (1 g/3 h of α-MoO 3 crystals). Additionally, it consumes just 0.108 kWh of energy per gram of α-MoO 3 , which achieves performance improvements exceeding 100-fold compared to SOTA methods. It produces long crystals with a length of up to 400 μm, comparable to arduous chemical and physical vapor deposition methods. The application prospects of MoO 3 crystals were demonstrated by integrating them into a polymer matrix as optical band rejection filters for selective ultraviolet light (UV) filtering in the 200–220 nm range. Two filters configurations, flat disc and optical fiber-based filters were fabricated using different concentrations of MoO 3 (0.5 wt%, 1 wt%, and 2 wt%) to evaluate their performance in transmission and absorption modes. The effect of varying optical fiber lengths (1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm) on the optical spectra was also investigated. The results highlight the potential of MoO 3 -based composites for selective UV filtering, making them suitable for UV-sensitive devices, personal UV protection, and applications requiring precise wavelength control for optimal performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Kumbhakar P et al (May 2021) Emerging 2D metal oxides and their applications. Mater Today 45:142–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2020.11.02310.1016/j.mattod.2020.11.023 ↗
2. Zhou K, Shang G, Hsu H, Han S, Roy VAL, Zhou Y (May 2023) Emerging 2D metal oxides: from synthesis to device integration. Adv Mater 35(21):2207774. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20220777410.1002/adma.202207774 ↗
3. Cao J, Wu J (Jan. 2011) Strain effects in low-dimensional transition metal oxides. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 71:2–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2010.08.00110.1016/j.mser.2010.08.001 ↗
4. Chen JS, Cheah YL, Madhavi S, Lou XW (May 2010) Fast synthesis of α-MoO 3 nanorods with controlled aspect ratios and their enhanced lithium storage capabilities. J Phys Chem C 114(18):8675–8678. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp101748210.1021/jp1017482 ↗
5. Hu S, Wang X (July 2008) Single-Walled MoO 3 nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 130:8126–8127. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja801448c10.1021/ja801448c ↗
6. Li J, Liu X (2013) Preparation and characterization of α-MoO3 nanobelt and its application in supercapacitor, Mater. Lett., vol. 112, pp. 39–42, Dec. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2013.08.09410.1016/j.matlet.2013.08.094 ↗
7. Wei XM, Zeng HC (2003) Large-Scale Organizations of MoO 3 Nanoplatelets with Single-Crystalline MoO 3 (4,4‘-bipyridyl) 0.5, J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 2619–2622, Mar. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp027417710.1021/jp0274177 ↗
8. Li S, Shao C, Liu Y, Tang S, Mu R (2006) Nanofibers and nanoplatelets of MoO3 via an electrospinning technique, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1869–1872, Aug. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.04.01710.1016/j.jpcs.2006.04.017 ↗
9. Huang L et al (Dec. 2018) Three-dimensional MoO3 nanoflowers assembled with nanosheets for Rhodamine B degradation under visible light. Mater Res Bull 108:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.08.03610.1016/j.materresbull.2018.08.036 ↗
10. Kalantar-zadeh K, Ou JZ, Daeneke T, Mitchell A, Sasaki T, Fuhrer MS (2016) Two dimensional and layered transition metal oxides. Appl Mater Today 5:73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2016.09.01210.1016/j.apmt.2016.09.012 ↗
11. Andron I et al (2020) Photochromic Behavior of ZnO/MoO 3 Interfaces, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 12, no. 41, pp. 46972–46980, Oct. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c1333510.1021/acsami.0c13335 ↗
12. Ivanova T, Gesheva KA, Popkirov G, Ganchev M, Tzvetkova E (2005) Electrochromic properties of atmospheric CVD MoO3 and MoO3–WO3 films and their application in electrochromic devices. Mater Sci Eng B Solid-State Mater Adv Appl 119(3):232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2004.12.08410.1016/j.mseb.2004.12.084 ↗
13. Morita M et al (2021) Chromogenic Amorphous MoO 3–x Nanosheets and Their Nanostructured Films for Smart Window Applications, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 8781–8788, Sept. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c0142810.1021/acsanm.1c01428 ↗
14. Zhu Y et al (2019) Nanostructured MoO3 for efficient energy and environmental catalysis. Molecules 25(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2501001810.3390/molecules25010018 ↗
15. Mariotti D, Lindström H, Bose AC, Ostrikov K. (Ken) (2008) Monoclinic β-MoO 3 nanosheets produced by atmospheric microplasma: application to lithium-ion batteries. Nanotechnology 19(49):495302. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/49/49530210.1088/0957-4484/19/49/495302 ↗
16. Ji H et al (2015) In situ preparation of sandwich MoO 3 /C hybrid nanostructures for high-rate and ultralong‐life supercapacitors. Adv Funct Mater 25(12):1886–1894. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140437810.1002/adfm.201404378 ↗
17. Avigad E, Etgar L (2018) Studying the effect of MoO 3 in hole-conductor-free perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett 3(9):2240–2245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0116910.1021/acsenergylett.8b01169 ↗
18. Comini E, Yubao L, Brando Y, Sberveglieri G (2005) Gas sensing properties of MoO3 nanorods to CO and CH3OH. Chem Phys Lett 407(4–6):368–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2005.03.11610.1016/j.cplett.2005.03.116 ↗
19. Scanlon DO, Watson GW, Payne DJ, Atkinson GR, Egdell RG, Law DSL (2010) Theoretical and experimental study of the electronic structures of MoO 3 and MoO 2. J Phys Chem C 114(10):4636–4645. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp909317210.1021/jp9093172 ↗
20. Yan B et al (2009) Orientation controllable growth of MoO 3 nanoflakes: micro-Raman, field emission, and birefringence properties. J Phys Chem C 113(47):20259–20263. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp907602w10.1021/jp907602w ↗
21. Zhou L, Yang L, Yuan P, Zou J, Wu Y, Yu C (2010) α-MoO 3 nanobelts: a high performance cathode material for lithium ion batteries. J Phys Chem C 114(49):21868–21872. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp108778v10.1021/jp108778v ↗
22. Wang L, Li M-C, Zhang G-H, Xue Z-L (2020) Morphology evolution and quantitative analysis of β-MoO3 and α-MoO3. High Temp Mater Processes 39(1):620–626. https://doi.org/10.1515/htmp-2020-009310.1515/htmp-2020-0093 ↗
23. Song J, Ni X, Gao L, Zheng H (2007) Synthesis of metastable h-MoO3 by simple chemical precipitation. Mater Chem Phys 102(2–3):245–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.12.01110.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.12.011 ↗
24. Sharma R, Sarkar A, Jha R, Sharma AK, Bhushan M, Bhardwaj R (2022) Synthesis & material properties of α-MoO3 nanoparticles. Mater Today Proc 48:683–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.09210.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.092 ↗
25. Nadimicherla R, Zha R, Wei L, Guo X (2016) Single crystalline flowerlike α-MoO3 nanorods and their application as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 687:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.09910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.099 ↗
26. Ijeh RO et al (2020) Optical, electrical and magnetic properties of copper doped electrodeposited MoO3 thin films. Ceram Int 46(8):10820–10828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.09310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.093 ↗
27. Sreedhara MB, Matte HSSR, Govindaraj A, Rao CNR (2013) Synthesis, characterization, and properties of few-layer MoO 3. Chem Asian J 8(10):2430–2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.20130047010.1002/asia.201300470 ↗
28. Da Silva Júnior MG et al (2023) A brief review of MoO3 and MoO3-based materials and recent technological applications in gas sensors, lithium-ion batteries, adsorption, and photocatalysis. Materials 16(24):7657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1624765710.3390/ma16247657 ↗
29. Ye R, James DK, Tour JM (2018) Laser-induced graphene. Acc Chem Res 51(7):1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0008410.1021/acs.accounts.8b00084 ↗
30. Lee T KERR SWITCHING FOR TEMPORAL NOISE FILTERING IN OPTICAL TELECOM QUANTUM COMMUNICATION
31. Tashima T et al (Jan. 2024) Ultra-broadband quantum infrared spectroscopy. Optica 11(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.50445010.1364/OPTICA.504450 ↗
32. Chou Chau Y-F (2024) Enhancing imaging capabilities with a high-sensitivity multichannel optical filter. Micro and Nanostructures 186:207732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micrna.2023.20773210.1016/j.micrna.2023.207732 ↗
33. Salih AE, Elsherif M, Alam F, Yetisen AK, Butt H (2021) Gold nanocomposite contact lenses for color blindness management. ACS Nano 15(3):4870–4880. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c0965710.1021/acsnano.0c09657 ↗
34. Sakr A, Salih A, Hisham M, Elsherif M, Schiffer A, Butt H (2024) Multifunctional and multimaterial contact lenses: tailored solutions for tunable color filtering and tear pH sensing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 19(1):e2298411. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2023.229841110.1080/17452759.2023.2298411 ↗
35. Jacob L, Syed SS, Cherumkuzhi MS, Salih AE, Butt H (2024) Biogenic gold nanoparticle-based antibacterial contact lenses for color blindness management. Adv Eng Mater 26(5):2301242. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20230124210.1002/adem.202301242 ↗
36. Villa GE et al (1998) The optical/UV filters for the EPIC experiment. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 45(3):921–926. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.68267010.1109/23.682670 ↗
37. Chekkaramkodi D, Ahmed I, Jacob L, Butt H (2024) 3D printed UV-sensing optical fiber probes: manufacturing, properties, and performance. Sci Rep 14(1):19001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69872-910.1038/s41598-024-69872-9 ↗
38. Dain SJ, Cheng BB, Roy M (2024) Ultraviolet protection in eye and face protection against biological hazards. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 44(6):1142–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.1334210.1111/opo.13342 ↗
39. Heidrich R, Barretta C, Mordvinkin A, Pinter G, Oreski G, Gottschalg R (2024) UV lamp spectral effects on the aging behavior of encapsulants for photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 266:112674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2023.11267410.1016/j.solmat.2023.112674 ↗
40. Müller M, Reich S, Pfütze C, Stelzer I (2024) Investigation of color protection of laminated glass by UV-blocking interlayers for conservation application. Glass Struct Eng 9(1):33–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-023-00246-910.1007/s40940-023-00246-9 ↗
41. Gupta PO, Sekar N (2024) Photophysical properties and photostability of novel 2-amino-3-benzothiazole thiophene-based azo disperse dyes. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 457:115924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2024.11592410.1016/j.jphotochem.2024.115924 ↗
42. Assi A, Michael-Jubeli R, Duplan H, Baillet‐Guffroy A, Tfayli A, Jacques‐Jamin C (2024) Effects of solar radiations on stratum corneum hydration: Part part II, protective action of solar filters. J Biophotonics 17(8):e202400107. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.20240010710.1002/jbio.202400107 ↗
43. Li P et al (2024) Indoor air quality improvement with filtration and UV-C on mitigation of particulate matter and airborne bacteria: monitoring and modeling. J Environ Manage 351:119764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.11976410.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119764 ↗
44. Yu Q, Wang G, Shao Z, Sun Y, Yang Z (2024) Changes in life history parameters and expression of key genes of Brachionus plicatilis exposed to a combination of organic and inorganic ultraviolet filters. Chemosphere 358:142213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.14221310.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142213 ↗
45. Huang W, Guo K, Pan Y, Chen C (2024) Enhancing the effectiveness of bioaerosol disinfection in indoor environments by optimizing far-UVC lamp locations based on Markov chain model. Sci Total Environ 912:168803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16880310.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168803 ↗
46. Demeersseman N, Saegeman V, Cossey V, Devriese H, Schuermans A (2023) Shedding a light on ultraviolet-C technologies in the hospital environment. J Hosp Infect 132:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.12.00910.1016/j.jhin.2022.12.009 ↗
47. Cattai F, D’Orazio A, Sbardella G (2023) A systematic review on the application of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation to HVAC systems. Energies 16(22):7569. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1622756910.3390/en16227569 ↗
48. Rajput NS, Kotbi A, Kaja K, Jouiad M (2022) Long-term aging of CVD grown 2D-MoS2 nanosheets in ambient environment. NPJ Mater Degrad 6(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-022-00288-410.1038/s41529-022-00288-4 ↗
49. Adsorption Equilibrium and Mechanism and of Water Molecule on the Surfaces of Molybdenite (MoS2) Based on Kinetic Monte-Carlo Method. Accessed: Dec. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/24/871010.3390/molecules27248710 ↗
50. Jiang Y, Liu Z, Zhou H, Sharma A, Deng J, Ke C (2023) Physical adsorption and oxidation of ultra-thin MoS2 crystals: insights into surface engineering for 2D electronics and beyond. Nanotechnology 34(40):405701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ace1f710.1088/1361-6528/ace1f7 ↗
51. A highly transparent humidity sensor with fast response speed based on α-MoO3 thin films - RSC Advances (RSC Publishing). Accessed: Dec. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/ra/d0ra03958f
52. Transparent humidity sensor with high sensitivity via a facile and scalable way based on liquid-phase exfoliated MoO3- nanosheets, Sens. Actuators Rep., vol. 4, pp. 100092–100092 (2022) Mar. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snr.2022.10009210.1016/j.snr.2022.100092 ↗
53. Zhang H et al (2015) Coating of α-MoO3 on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes by electrodeposition as a high-performance cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 274:1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.13610.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.136 ↗
54. Sen SK, Paul TC, Dutta S, Matin MA, Islam MF, Hakim MA (2019) Effect of gamma (γ-) irradiation on the structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties of spray pyrolysis-deposited h-MoO3 thin films. Surf Interfaces 17:100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.10037710.1016/j.surfin.2019.100377 ↗
55. Vorobeva NS, Lipatov A, Muratov DS, Sinitskii A (2018) Chemical vapor deposition and characterization of two-dimensional molybdenum dioxide (MoO 2 ) nanoplatelets. Nanotechnology 29(50):505707. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aae36610.1088/1361-6528/aae366 ↗
56. Sun H et al (2019) One-step synthesis of centimeter-size alpha-MoO3 with single crystallinity. Appl Surf Sci 476:789–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.16910.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.169 ↗
57. Swathi S et al (2020) Water-splitting application of orthorhombic molybdite α-MoO3 nanorods. Ceram Int 46(14):23218–23222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.10410.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.104 ↗
58. Yusuf B, Hashim MR, Pakhuruddin MZ, Halim MM (2022) Effect of solution flow rate on the physical properties of spray pyrolyzed MoO3 thin films as silicon-based heterojunction device. Micro and Nanostructures 164:107111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2021.10711110.1016/j.spmi.2021.107111 ↗
59. Zhao N et al (2020) Simple electrodeposition of MoO3 film on carbon cloth for high-performance aqueous symmetric supercapacitors. Chem Eng J 390:124477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12447710.1016/j.cej.2020.124477 ↗
60. Geeta Rani B, Saisri R, Kailasa S, Sai Bhargava Reddy M, Maseed H, Venkateswara Rao K (2020) Architectural tailoring of orthorhombic MoO3 nanostructures toward efficient NO2 gas sensing. J Mater Sci 55(19):8109–8122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04601-x10.1007/s10853-020-04601-x ↗
61. Li Z, Ma J, Zhang B, Song C, Wang D (2017) Crystal phase- and morphology-controlled synthesis of MoO 3 materials. CrystEngComm 19(11):1479–1485. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CE02437H10.1039/C6CE02437H ↗
62. Phuruangrat A, Ham DJ, Thongtem S, Lee JS (2009) Electrochemical hydrogen evolution over MoO3 nanowires produced by microwave-assisted hydrothermal reaction. Electrochem Commun 11(9):1740–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2009.07.00510.1016/j.elecom.2009.07.005 ↗
63. Raza A, Ali M, Ayub N, Atta S, Jawad M (2024) Chemical vapor deposition-based synthesis of binder-free nanostructure α-MoO 3 electrode material for PES devices. Phys Scr 99(5):055910. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad350210.1088/1402-4896/ad3502 ↗
64. Yang S, Liu Y, Jin W, Qi Y, Zakharova GS, Chen W (2015) Controlled synthesis of micro/nano MoO 3 by physical vapor deposition and its gas sensing properties to NH 3 gas at room temperature. Ferroelectrics 477(1):112–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2015.100013710.1080/00150193.2015.1000137 ↗
65. Zhao D et al (2019) Facile synthesis of MoO3 nanospheres and their application in water treatment. Mater Lett 256:126648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12664810.1016/j.matlet.2019.126648 ↗
66. Ma Y et al (2015) Facile synthesize α-MoO3 nanobelts with high adsorption property. Mater Lett 157:53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.09510.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.095 ↗
67. Patil AR et al (2024) Synthesis, analysis, and characterizations of microspherical MoO3 thin films for energy storage. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 35(8):590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-12361-610.1007/s10854-024-12361-6 ↗
68. Tamboli PS et al (2018) Spray pyrolytic deposition of α-MoO3 film and its use in dye-sensitized solar cell. Appl Phys A 124(4):339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-018-1763-610.1007/s00339-018-1763-6 ↗
69. Lou XW, Zeng HC (2002) Hydrothermal synthesis of α-MoO 3 nanorods via acidification of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate. Chem Mater 14(11):4781–4789. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm020623710.1021/cm0206237 ↗
70. Sharma RK, Reddy GB (2014) Effect of substrate temperature on the characteristics of α-MoO3 hierarchical 3D microspheres prepared by facile PVD process. J Alloys Compd 598:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.23810.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.238 ↗
71. Jadkar V et al (2017) Synthesis of orthorhombic-molybdenum trioxide (α-MoO3) thin films by hot wire-CVD and investigations of its humidity sensing properties. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28(21):15790–15796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7473-610.1007/s10854-017-7473-6 ↗
72. Hanson ED et al (2017) Systematic study of oxygen vacancy tunable transport properties of few-layer MoO 3− x enabled by vapor‐based synthesis. Adv Funct Mater 27(17):1605380. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20160538010.1002/adfm.201605380 ↗
73. Garadkar KM, Patil AA, Hankare PP, Chate PA, Sathe DJ, Delekar SD (2009) MoS2: preparation and their characterization. J Alloys Compd 487(1–2):786–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.06910.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.069 ↗
74. Yang X, Tang H, Zhang R, Song H, Cao K (2011) Synthesis of high-quality crystalline α‐MoO 3 nanobelts. Cryst Res Technol 46(4):409–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.20110006110.1002/crat.201100061 ↗
75. Li H et al (2012) From Bulk to Monolayer MoS 2: Evolution of Raman Scattering, Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1385–1390, Apr. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20110211110.1002/adfm.201102111 ↗
76. Viršek M, Jesih A, Milošević I, Damnjanović M, Remškar M (2007) Raman scattering of the MoS2 and WS2 single nanotubes. Surf Sci 601(13):2868–2872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2006.12.05010.1016/j.susc.2006.12.050 ↗
77. Thomas N et al (Sept. 2021) 2D MoS2: structure, mechanisms, and photocatalytic applications. Mater Today Sustain 13:100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2021.10007310.1016/j.mtsust.2021.100073 ↗
78. Chakraborty B, Matte HSSR, Sood AK, Rao CNR (2013) Layer-dependent resonant raman scattering of a few layer MoS 2. J Raman Spectrosc 44(1):92–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.414710.1002/jrs.4147 ↗
79. High temperature anomalous Raman and photoluminescence response of molybdenum disulfide with sulfur vacancies | Scientific Reports. Accessed: Dec. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-43756-w
80. Diaz-Droguett DE, El Far R, Fuenzalida VM, Cabrera AL (2012) In situ-Raman studies on thermally induced structural changes of porous MoO3 prepared in vapor phase under He and H2. Mater Chem Phys 134(2–3):631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.04210.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.042 ↗
81. Lee S-H, Seong MJ, Tracy CE, Mascarenhas A, Pitts JR, Deb SK (2002) Raman spectroscopic studies of electrochromic a-MoO3 thin films. Solid State Ionics 147(1–2):129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(01)01035-910.1016/S0167-2738(01)01035-9 ↗
82. Wongkrua P, Thongtem T, Thongtem S (2013) Synthesis of h- and α -MoO 3 by refluxing and calcination combination: phase and morphology transformation, photocatalysis, and photosensitization. J Nanomater 2013:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/70267910.1155/2013/702679 ↗
83. Wang L, Li H, Xue Z (2023) Synthesis of h-MoO3 nanorods and h-/α-MoO3 composites and their photocatalytic performance. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 33(7):2155–2167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(23)66250-810.1016/S1003-6326(23)66250-8 ↗
84. Hou X et al (Nov. 2018) Single-Crystal MoO3 micrometer and millimeter belts prepared from discarded molybdenum disilicide heating elements. Sci Rep 8(1):16771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34849-y10.1038/s41598-018-34849-y ↗
85. Ali S, Farrukh MA (2018) Effect of calcination temperature on the structural, thermodynamic, and optical properties of MoO 3 nanoparticles. J Chin Chem Soc 65(2):276–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.20170016310.1002/jccs.201700163 ↗
86. Zhou YH, An HN, Gao C, Zheng ZQ, Wang B (2019) UV–Vis-NIR photodetector based on monolayer MoS2. Mater Lett 237:298–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.11210.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.112 ↗
87. Jinguji K, Oguma M (2000) Optical half-band filters. J Light Technol 18(2):252–259. https://doi.org/10.1109/50.82280010.1109/50.822800 ↗
88. Niraula M, Yoon JW, Magnusson R (2015) Single-layer optical bandpass filter technology. Opt Lett 40(21):5062. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.00506210.1364/OL.40.005062 ↗
89. Dashti M, Emami F, Zohoori S (2024) Advancements in the design and optimization of plasmonic bandpass filters for enhanced optical communication systems: a comprehensive review. Discov Electron 1(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44291-024-00014-110.1007/s44291-024-00014-1 ↗
90. Borjanović V et al (2009) Influence of proton irradiation on the structure and stability of poly(dimethylsiloxane) and poly(dimethylsiloxane)-nanodiamond composite, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. Process. Meas. Phenom., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2396–2403, Nov. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.325815610.1116/1.3258156 ↗
91. González-Vázquez M, Hautefeuille M (2017) Controlled solvent-free formation of embedded PDMS-derived carbon nanodomains with tunable fluorescence using selective laser ablation with a low-power CD laser. Micromachines 8(10):307. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi810030710.3390/mi8100307 ↗
92. Zhang Y et al (2024) Advanced optical polarizers based on 2D materials. NPJ Nanophotonics 1(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44310-024-00028-310.1038/s44310-024-00028-3 ↗
93. Saha N, Brunetti G, Di Toma A, Armenise MN, Ciminelli C (2024) Silicon photonic filters: a pathway from basics to applications. Adv Photonics Res 2300343. https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.20230034310.1002/adpr.202300343 ↗
94. Irede EL et al (2024) Cutting-edge developments in zinc oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and applications for enhanced antimicrobial and UV protection in healthcare solutions. RSC Adv 14(29):20992–21034. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA02452D10.1039/D4RA02452D ↗
95. An K et al (Mar. 2024) Recent advances of cerium compounds in functional coatings: Principle, strategies, and applications. J Rare Earths p. S 1002072124000942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2024.03.01710.1016/j.jre.2024.03.017 ↗
96. Wang Z, Madhavi S, Lou X. W. (David) (2012) Ultralong α-MoO 3 nanobelts: synthesis and effect of binder choice on their lithium storage properties. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces 116(23):12508–12513. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp304216z10.1021/jp304216z ↗
97. Zhou C et al (2020) A facile route to synthesize Ag decorated MoO3 nanocomposite for symmetric supercapacitor. Ceram Int 46(10):15385–15391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.08310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.083 ↗
98. Chen T (2024) Biomimetic mineralization: construction and biomedical applications of biohybrid materials. Mater Chem Front 10.1039.D4QM00506F. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4QM00506F10.1039/D4QM00506F ↗
99. Jiang J, Lu Y, Meyer BK, Hofmann DM, Eickhoff M (2016) Shift of optical absorption edge in SnO2 films with high concentrations of nitrogen grown by chemical vapor deposition. J Appl Phys 119(24):245703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.495469310.1063/1.4954693 ↗
100. Ahmed I, Ali M, Elsherif M, Butt H (2023) UV polymerization fabrication method for polymer composite based optical fiber sensors. Sci Rep 13(1):10823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33991-610.1038/s41598-023-33991-6 ↗