Effects of Viewing Distance on Visual and Visual-Tactile Evaluation of Black Fabric
Source abstract
Abstract
Black fabrics with different surface textures generated from the weave structure and yarn type were selected to examine how viewing distance affects changes in impression. Participants evaluated 16 fabrics draped over the spherical stand from a distance of 150 cm, then evaluated their visual-only and visual—tactile impressions from a distance of 15 cm. Semantic differential scaling of ±3 points for 12 bipolar adjective pairs word were used. It was found that the fabric impression of transparency and gloss were influenced by the viewing distance. When the gloss was perceived at 150 cm, the impression did not change at the shorter distance for samples F8 (shantung) and F15 (lawn). Regarding aesthetic components such as beautiful, like was perceived more visually at 150 cm than with a visual—tactile evaluation at 15 cm. The mechanical and surface properties of the fabrics were measured using the KES-FB system. An obvious change in perception of hardness/softness between two viewing distance were observed for samples with low bending rigidity. Surface morphology characteristics such as surface roughness (SMD) and mean deviation of surface friction (MMD) and air resistance are useful parameters for understanding the changes in impression according to viewing distance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Color perception and design · Color Science and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Systems Course, Osaka Prefecture University College of Technology
Department of Advanced Fibro-Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] S. Morioka, M. Kamijo, S. Hosoya, T. Sadoyama and Y. Shimizu, IEICE Tech. Rep., 100, 39 (2000).
2. [2] L. Li, A. Asano, C. Muraki Asano and K. Okajima, J.Opt. Soc. Am. A, 30, 1394, (2013).10.1364/JOSAA.30.001394 ↗
3. [3] L. Li, A. Asano, and C. Muraki Asano, Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Smart Info Media Systems in Asia (IEICE, 2009), 125 (2009).
4. [4] W. Lee and M. Sato, Color. Res. App., 26, 469 (2001).10.1002/col.1067 ↗
5. [5] S. Kawabata “The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation,” 2nd ed. Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 23 (1980).
6. [6] S. Kawabata and M. Niwa, The Journal of the Textile Institute, 80, 19 (1989).10.1080/00405008908659184 ↗
7. [7] R. H. Brand, Text. Res.J., 34, 791 (1964).10.1177/004051756403400909 ↗
8. [8] P. Phoophat, H. Yamamoto and S. Sukigara, The Journal of the Textile Institute, 1754 (2018).
9. [9] S. Kitaguchi, M. Kumazawa, H. Morita, M. Endo, T.Sato and S. Sukigara, Journal of Textile Engineering, 63, 33 (2017).10.4188/jte.63.33 ↗
10. [10] H. Maru, S. Saito, H. Kanai and T. Nishimatsu, Journal of Textile Engineering, 62, 135 (2016).10.4188/jte.62.135 ↗
11. [11] H. Maru, S. Saito, H. Kanai, T. Nishimatsu, Journal of Textile Engineering, 62, 143 (2016).10.4188/jte.62.135 ↗
12. [12] H. Maru, S. Saito, H. Kanai and T. Nishimatsu, Journal of Textile Engineering, 63, 55 (2017).10.4188/jte.63.141 ↗
13. [13] A. Goto, A. Kondo and S. Sukigara, Proceedings of the 13th Asian Textile Conference, Lightweight Structures Association Australia, 3, 950 (2015).
14. [14] C. Jung and N. Naruse, Sen-i Gakkaishi, 51, 338 (1995).10.2115/fiber.51.7_338 ↗
15. [15] R. Jafari, S. H. Amirshahi and S. A. Hosseini Ravandi, J. Coat. Technol. Res., 13, 871 (2016).10.1007/s11998-016-9790-8 ↗
16. [16] H. A. Morton, Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 339 (1982).10.3758/BF03202657 ↗
17. [17] Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers “Sensory evaluation hand book” Tokyo: JUSE Press Ltd. (1999).
18. [18] K. Varmuza and P. Filzmoser, Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Chemometrics, 63, CRC Press, Florida (2009).
19. [19] J. H. Ward, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236 (1963).10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 ↗
20. [20] M. Niwa, M. Nakanishi, M. Ayada, S. Kawabata,Text. Res. J, 68, 578 (1998).10.1177/004051759806800806 ↗