Surlyn resin ionic interlayer-based laminated glass: preparation and property analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a Surlyn resin ionic interlayer was prepared. Its thermal stability, crystallization, and dynamic mechanical properties were tested, and the thermal stability and crystallization properties of the material were compared with SentryGlas® Plus (SGP) and polyvinyl butyral (PVB) interlayers. The experimental results show that the thermal stability and crystallinity of the ionic interlayer are very close to the SGP interlayer, both of which belong to ionomers, and the performance of the ion interlayer is better than that of the PVB interlayer. Laminated glass was prepared using ionic interlayer and PVB interlayer and tested for light transmittance and bending resistance. The laminated glass with the ionic interlayer film had higher light transmittance than the PVB laminated glass, and the bending strength was more than twice that of the laminated glass with the PVB interlayer. These results show that the Surlyn resin has the potential to replace SGP as interlayers in the laminated glass.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Building materials and conservation · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Angelides SC, Talbot JP, Overend M (2019) The effects of high strain-rate and in-plane restraint on quasi-statically loaded laminated glass: a theoretical study with applications to blast enhancement. Glass Struc Eng 4(3):403–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-019-00107-410.1007/s40940-019-00107-4 ↗
2. Bos FP (2009) Safety concepts in structural glass engineering - towards an integrated approach. Technische Universiteit Delft, Netherlands
3. Martens K, Caspeele R, Belis J (2018) Membrane action in reinforced glass beam systems: experimental setup and results. Constr Build Mater 192:301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.12010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.120 ↗
4. Samieian MA, Cormie D, Smith D et al (2019) On the bonding between glass and PVB in laminated glass. Eng Fract Mech 214:504–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.04.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.04.006 ↗
5. Xu X, Xu J, Chen J et al (2016) Investigation of dynamic multi-cracking behavior in PVB laminated glass plates. Int J Impact Eng 100:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.10.01310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.10.013 ↗
6. Biolzi L, Cattaneo S, Orlando M et al (2018) Post-failure behavior of laminated glass beams using different interlayers. Compos Struct 202:578–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.009 ↗
7. Wu L, Wang L, Huang D, Xu Y (2020) An ordinary state-based peridynamic modeling for dynamic fracture of laminated glass under low-velocity impact. Compos Struct 234:111722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11172210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111722 ↗
8. Xu J, Li Y, Ge D, Liu B, Zhu M (2011) Experimental investigation on constitutive behavior of PVB under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 38(2–3):106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.001 ↗
9. Ma Y, Zhuang Z, Ma M et al (2019) Solid polyaniline dendrites consisting of high aspect ratio branches self-assembled using sodium lauryl sulfonate as soft templates: synthesis and electrochemical performance. Polymer 182:121808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12180810.1016/j.polymer.2019.121808 ↗
10. Ma Y et al (2018) Tuning polyaniline nanostructures via end group substitutions and their morphology dependent electrochemical performances. Polymer 156:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.05110.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.051 ↗
11. Belis J, Depauw J, Callewaert D et al (2009) Failure mechanisms and residual capacity of annealed glass/SGP laminated beams at room temperature. Eng Fail Anal 16(6):1866–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.09.02310.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.09.023 ↗
12. Martín M, Solé A, Barreneche C et al (2020) Polymeric interlayer materials for laminated glass: a review. Constr Build Mater 230:116897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11689710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116897 ↗
13. Mohagheghian I, Charalambides MN, Wang Y et al (2018) Effect of the polymer interlayer on the high-velocity soft impact response of laminated glass plates. Int J Impact Eng 120:150–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.06.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.06.002 ↗
14. Serafinavičius T, Lebet JP, Louter C, Lenkimas T, Kuranovas A (2013) Long-term laminated glass four point bending test with PVB, EVA and SG interlayers at different temperatures. Procedia Eng 57:996–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.12610.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.126 ↗
15. Wang XE, Yang J, Liu Q, Zhao C (2018) Experimental investigations into SGP laminated glass under low velocity impact. Int J Impact Eng 122:91–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.06.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.06.010 ↗
16. Ma Y, Hou C, Zhang H et al (2019) Three-dimensional core-shell Fe3O4/Polyaniline coaxial heterogeneous nanonets: preparation and high performance supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochim Acta 315:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.07310.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.073 ↗
17. Xu C, Yuan Y, Zhao C et al (2018) Dynamic crack-interface interactions in SGP laminated glass: an experimental investigation. Mech Mater 122:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.04.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2018.04.006 ↗
18. Zhao C, Yang J et al (2019) Experimental investigation into the post-breakage performance of pre-cracked laminated glass plates. Constr Build Mater 224:996–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.28610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.286 ↗
19. Zhang X, Mohammed IK, Zheng M et al (2019) Temperature effects on the low velocity impact response of laminated glass with different types of interlayer materials. Int J Impact Eng 124:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.09.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.09.004 ↗
20. Balaji A, Karthikeyan B, Swaminathan J (2019) Comparative mechanical, thermal, and morphological study of untreated and NaOH-treated bagasse fiber-reinforced cardanol green composites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-019-00079-710.1007/s42114-019-00079-7 ↗
21. Khan SH, Pathak B, Fulekar MH (2021) A study on the influence of metal (Fe Bi and Ag) doping on structural optical and antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanostructures. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 3:551–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00174-010.1007/s42114-020-00174-0 ↗
22. Baig A, Rathinam V, Ramya V (2021) Facile fabrication of Zn-doped SnO2 nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic dye degradation performance under visible light exposure. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:114–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00195-910.1007/s42114-020-00195-9 ↗
23. Yeole P, Vaidya U (2021) Hybrid fiber metal composite laminate interlaminar reinforcement through metal interlocks. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00186-w10.1007/s42114-020-00186-w ↗
24. Zhou Y, Liu F et al (2019) Use of BN-coated copper nanowires in nanocomposites with enhanced thermal conductivity and electrical insulation. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2(1):46–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-019-00077-910.1007/s42114-019-00077-9 ↗
25. Sengwa RJ, Choudhary S, Dhatarwal P (2019) Investigation of alumina nanofiller impact on the structural and dielectric properties of PEO/PMMA blend matrix-based polymer nanocomposites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2:162–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-019-00078-810.1007/s42114-019-00078-8 ↗
26. Luinge H, Warnet LL (2020) On an application of multi-material composite laminates in the aerospace sector. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 3:294–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00163-310.1007/s42114-020-00163-3 ↗
27. Yan H, Dai X, Ruan K et al (2021) Flexible thermally conductive and electrically insulating silicone rubber composite films with BNNS@Al2O3 fillers. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:36–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00208-110.1007/s42114-021-00208-1 ↗
28. Su Y, Yin H, Wang X et al (2021) Preparation and properties of ethylene-acrylate salt ionomer/polypropylene antistatic alloy. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00219-y10.1007/s42114-021-00219-y ↗
29. Xie P, Liu Y, Feng M et al (2021) Hierarchically porous Co/C nanocomposites for ultralight high-performance microwave absorption. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00202-z10.1007/s42114-020-00202-z ↗
30. Basak S (2021) Redesigning the modern applied medical sciences and engineering with shape memory polymers. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00216-110.1007/s42114-021-00216-1 ↗
31. Delincé D, Callewaert D, Belis J et al (2008) Post-breakage behaviour of laminated glass in structural applications. University of Pécs, Hungary
32. Delincé D, Sonck D, Belis J et al (2008) Experimental investigation of the local bridging behaviour of the interlayer in broken laminated glass. Int Symp on the App Arch Glass ISAAG 2008 Conf Proc p 41–49. http://doi.org/1854/13120
33. Lin J et al (2018) Synthesis and characterization of phosphonated poly (ethylene terephthalate) ionomers. Polymer 151:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.07.06510.1016/j.polymer.2018.07.065 ↗
34. Ma Y, Hou C, Zhang H et al (2017) Morphology-dependent electrochemical supercapacitors in multi-dimensional polyaniline nanostructures. J Mater Chem A 5(27):14041–14052. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA03279J10.1039/C7TA03279J ↗
35. Aoyama M, Koda T, Miyata K, Nishio T, Nishioka A (2015) Mechanical and thermal properties of potassium salts of poly(ethylene-co-ethylacrylate): polyolefin ionomers in the absence of acid groups. Polymer Eng Sci 55(8):1843–1848. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2402310.1002/pen.24023 ↗
36. Lim HT, Liu H, Ahn KH et al (2010) Effect of added ionomer on morphology and properties of PP/organoclay nanocomposites. Korean J Chem Eng 27(2):705–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0104-z10.1007/s11814-010-0104-z ↗
37. Ma X, Sauer JA, Hara M (1995) Poly(methyl methacrylate) based Ionomers 1 Dynamic Mechanical Properties and Morphology. Macromolecules 28(11):3953–3962. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00115a03110.1021/ma00115a031 ↗
38. Kalista SJ et al (2013) Effect of ionic content on ballistic self-healing in EMAA copolymers and ionomers. Polym Chem 4(18):4910–4926. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3py00095h10.1039/c3py00095h ↗
39. Wakabayashi K, Register RA (2006) Morphological origin of the multistep relaxation behavior in semicrystalline ethylene/methacrylic acid ionomers. Macromolecules 39(3):1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma052081v10.1021/ma052081v ↗
40. Duarte I, Rotter A, Malvestiti A et al (2009) The role of glass as a barrier against the transmission of ultraviolet radiation: an experimental study. Photodermatol, Photoimmunol & Photomed, 25(4):181-184. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0781.2009.00434.x10.1111/j.1600-0781.2009.00434.x ↗
41. Yuan B, Guo M, Murugadoss V et al (2021) Immobilization of graphitic carbon nitride on wood surface via chemical crosslinking method for UV resistance and self-cleaning. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:286–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00235-y10.1007/s42114-021-00235-y ↗
42. Zhuang Z, Wang W, Wei Y et al (2021) Preparation of polyaniline nanorods/manganese dioxide nanoflowers core/shell nanostructure and investigation of electrochemical performances. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00225-010.1007/s42114-021-00225-0 ↗