3D-Printed Lightweight Earth Fiber: From Tiles to Tessellations
Source abstract
Abstract
3D-printed earth materials that incorporate natural raw soils have been recently emerging due to their ecological and affordability potential. However, earth materials applications in additive manufacturing have been limited to thick mass assemblies with little to no fiber reinforcement. The addition of natural plant fibers within earth-based mixtures may advantageously increase ductility while allowing for lightweight assembly types, such as thin and perforated elements. This article presents a novel research development on natural, raw, and untreated earth-fiber compositions with maximized wheat straw fiber content for 3D-printed lightweight architectural tiling applications. Initiated with an experimental printability apparatus of a range of mix designs, a printable “light straw clay” mixture is defined through extrudability and buildability tests. Then, combining the digital craft of weaving with natural fibers for earthen lightweight artifacts, a geometric analysis explores potential super lightweight and structurally sound tessellations to allow for minimum material in the production of perforated panels. The third phase of the research included structural bending tests to assess the number of layers required for the final tile production. Finally, the resulting 3D-printed modular components were assembled to create a lightweight installation, hung and exhibited with an interplay of light and shade. By maximizing co-product vegetable fiber content within an earthen and bio-based paste, this research aims to increase the carbon storage capabilities of digital earth construction while enhancing its lightness and tensile possibilities. Learning from vernacular “recipes” of natural earth- and fiber-based construction, the developed paper-thin partition assemblage presented in this article contributes to wider possibilities of natural, nonconventional, and radically low-carbon material systems and geometries in digital fabrication.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Architecture and Computational Design · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Hygrothermal properties of building materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.10609710.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106097 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10891110.1016/j.matdes.2020.108911 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13249610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132496 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13589110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135891 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11015810.1016/j.matdes.2021.110158 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10788410.1016/j.matdes.2019.107884 ↗
7. 10.1080/00038628.2019.160677610.1080/00038628.2019.1606776 ↗
8. 10.1089/3dp.2015.002210.1089/3dp.2015.0022 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.009 ↗
10. Doleman L. Essential Light Straw Clay Construction : The Complete Step-by-Step Guide. Sustainable Building Essentials. New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada; 2017.
11. 10.1515/978303560645410.1515/9783035606454 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.11033910.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110339 ↗
13. 10.3130/jaabe.16.20910.3130/jaabe.16.209 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.11095110.1016/j.rser.2021.110951 ↗
15. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Completing the picture. how the circular economy tackles climate change. 2021. Available from: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/completing-the-picture [Last accessed: August12 2023].
16. Ben-Alon L. Farm to building catalyzing the use of natural, net-zero, and healthier building materials. In: The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Carbon in the Built Environment. ISBN 978-1-00-327792-7, Routledge; 2023.
17. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.08.00510.1016/j.enbuild.2004.08.005 ↗
18. 10.1533/9780857096166.5.68810.1533/9780857096166.5.688 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.04510.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.045 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.02710.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.027 ↗
21. Elizabeth L, , Adams C., (eds). Alternative Construction : Contemporary Natural Building Methods. Wiley: New York; 2005.
22. 10.3989/ic.10.01810.3989/ic.10.018 ↗
23. Ben-Alon L, , Loftness V, , Harries K, et al. Integrating earthen building materials and methods using perception surveys and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). In: Proceedings of LEHM. Herausgeber: Weimar, Germany; 2020; pp. 1–10.
24. Ben-Alon L Loftness V Harries K et al. Overcoming the perceptual gap: Worldwide perceived comfort survey of earthen building experts and homeowners. In: Construction Technologies and Architecture Scientific.Net: Barcelona Spain; 2022; pp. 521–528; doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.52110.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.521 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.foar.2022.10.00110.1016/j.foar.2022.10.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10357710.1016/j.autcon.2021.103577 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11062410.1016/j.matdes.2022.110624 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.23910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.239 ↗
29. Campos T. The use of natural materials in additive manufacturing of buildings components—towards a more sustainable architecture. In: Towards a New Configurable Architecture—Proceedings of the 39th eCAADe Conference—Volume 1 (Stojakovic V and Tepavcevic B. Eds.) University of Novi Sad: Novi Sad Serbia 8–10 September 2021; 355–364 CUMINCAD; 2021.10.52842/conf.ecaade.2021.1.355 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10496310.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104963 ↗
31. Bryson ZE Srubar WV Kawashima S et al. Towards 3D printed earth- and bio-based insulation materials: A case study on light straw clay. In: 18th International Conference on Non-Conventional Materials and Technologies (NOCMAT 2022) pp. 7–23; June 2022 (Session 2B Part Paper 61) Zenodo; 2022; doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6611395
32. 10.1007/978-3-031-33465-8_4210.1007/978-3-031-33465-8_42 ↗
33. Germanà ML, , Alatawneh B, , Reffat R. Technological and behavioral aspects of perforated building envelopes in the mediterranean region. In: Advanced Building Skins, 23–24 April 2015 : International Conference on Building Envelope Design and Technology/Oliver Englhardt. Technical University of Graz Publishing: Berna, Switzerland: Graz; 2015; doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3135.4326
34. 10.1016/j.seta.2022.10200110.1016/j.seta.2022.102001 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.04010.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.040 ↗
36. Sood R, , Patil A. Analysis and review of the kinetic façades in Kolding Campus, South Denmark University. In: Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Computing. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. (Dubey H.M, , Pandit M, , Srivastava L, , Panigrahi B.K. (Eds), Springer: Singapore; 2022; pp. 265–274; doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-1220-6_23
37. Mounir Y. Modern Mashrabiyas with high-tech daylight responsive systems. In: Cities’ Identity Through Architecture and Arts (CITAA). Taylor & Francis: London, UK; 2017; p. 584; doi: 10.21625/archive.v1i1.113
38. Max N. Visualizing Hilbert curves. In: Proceedings Visualization ‘98 (Cat. No.98CB36276) IEEE: Research Triangle Park USA; 1998; pp. 447–450; doi: 10.1109/VISUAL.1998.74534010.1109/VISUAL.1998.745340 ↗
39. Szpakowski W. 1883-1973 : Linie Rytmiczne. (Łubowicz E. ed). Muzeum Sztuki: Łódź; 1978.
40. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.20910.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.209 ↗
41. Lehm Ton Erde. Loam clay earth martin Rauch Vorarlberg. 2019. Available from: https://www.lehmtonerde.at/en/ [Last accessed: November29 2023].
42. Anna Heringer. Kindergarten Zimbabwe. 2012. Available from: http://www.anna-heringer.com/projects/kindergarten-zimbabwe/ [Last accessed: April27 2023].