journal article·2024-01-01Open access

Evaluation the Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on Fiber Fragment Release from Textiles

Atsumi Sakamaki, Maika Tamari, Chigusa Genosumi, Keiko Shimizu, Yoshie Yamada, Kunio Katano, Kaname Katsuraya

Abstract

The degradation of textile products and the release of fiber fragment in daily life were investigated, with a focus on ultraviolet (UV) radiation. The impact of UV degradation on fiber release was assessed using a super-accelerated weathering tester. Accelerated weathering tests were conducted with a typical specimen size (150 × 70 mm), and a washing procedure suitable for this cloth size was developed. A high reproducibility of 2.28 % maximum error was achieved by manually rubbing and repeating the cleaning process until no fibre release was observed.Continuous irradiation tests and washing, performed at 24 h intervals, ranging from 0 h (unirradiated) to a maximum of 168 h, revealed an increase in the amount of fiber release with prolonged irradiation time. Notably, nylon exhibited the highest susceptibility to degradation induced by ultraviolet radiation. Cotton/polyester showed a Fibre Fragment (FF) release rate of about 6 % in continuous irradiation tests, which increased to about 15 % after repeated irradiation and washing every 24 h for up to a maximum of 168 h. An examination of the effect of fluorescent brighteners on UV degradation showed no discernible impact.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Material Properties and Processing · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Human Ecology, Wayo Women’s University

Suga Test Instruments Co., Ltd.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Cared sea turtle discharged plastic waste for more than one month Osaka Aquarium Kaiyukan, Sankei Shimbun, (2021/7/15). https://www.sankei.com/article/20210715-4CJCCJLA6FNJTDGQGNLIOBL6EI/
2. R.C. Thompson, Y. Olsen, R. P. Mitchell, A Davis, et al., Sci., 304(5672), 838 (2004).10.1126/science.1094559 ↗
3. For the prevention of microplastic release into the aquatic environment during the washing of synthetic textiles, Cross Industry Agreement, EURATEX (2021).
4. Primary Microplastics in the Oceans, J. Boucher, D. Friot, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2017).
5. L. Yang, F. Qiao, K. Lei, Y. Kang, et al., Environ. Pollut., 249, 136 (2019).10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.011 ↗
6. M. Shiobara, T. Sugito, H. Kawabata, J. Home Econ. Jpn., 73(8), 518 (2022).
7. K. Senathirajah, T. Palanisami, University of Newcastle, Report for WWF Singapore, (2019).
8. H. Okochi, N Yoshida, H. Zhao, et al., J. Jpn. Soc. Atmos. Environ., 57(3), A66 (2022).
9. J. Gasperi1, S. L. Wright, R. Dris, et al., Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 1, 1 (2018).
10. M. Bergmann, S. Mützel, S. Primpke, M. B. Tekman, et al., Sci. Adv., 5(8) (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aax1157 ↗
11. S. Allen, D. Allen, K. Moss,G. Le Roux, et al., PLoS ONE, 15(5): e0232746 (2020).10.1371/journal.pone.0232746 ↗
12. K. Imada, J. Fiber Sci. Technol., 56(10), 427 (2003).
13. L. Sørensen, A. S. Groven, I. A. Hovsbakken, O. D.Puerto, et al., Sci. Total Environ., 755, 1 (2021).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143170 ↗
14. J. L. Gardette, A. Colin, S. Trivis, et al., Polym. Degrad. Stab., 103,35 (2014).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.02.021 ↗
15. M. Moezzi, J. Yekrang , M. Ghane, et al., Jind. Text., 50(2), 240 (2020).10.1177/1528083718825316 ↗
16. D. Sedláček, M. Roso, A. P. Manian, Fibers and Polymers., 24, 3889 (2023).10.1007/s12221-023-00311-8 ↗
17. V. F. González, J. M. Andrade, B. Ferreiro, et al., Spect Act A., 263 (2021).10.32621/ACOTACIONES.2021.47.10 ↗