journal article·2023-01-01Open access

Functional Expression of Low Puncture Resistance and Physical Property Evaluation of a Suture Training Model Made of Polyurethanes

Kozue Nakamura, Masataka Ogasawara, Kazuya Matsumoto, Hideaki Andoh, Mitsutoshi Jikei

Abstract

Polyurethanes are applied as artificial skin materials for medical simulators. There is a difference between human skin and artificial skin for simulators with respect to “puncture resistance.” Based on comments from medical doctors who perform puncture procedures in clinical sites, puncturing human skin is expressed as “low needle resistance,” whereas the artificial skin for simulators is expressed as “high needle resistance.” It is possible to practice medical procedures with a more realistic sensation if the artificial skin’s puncture resistance is brought closer to that of the human skin. In this study, sensory evaluations via needle suturing and quantitative evaluation via measuring devices were performed to clarify the relationship between the puncture resistance force and physical properties of three artificial skin samples for a suture training model made of polyurethanes. The composition and molecular structures of the materials were confirmed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance. The puncture resistance force measurements showed that Regina’s artificial skin: MODEL A was the lowest in three samples. Additionally, we discovered that low Young’s modulus and the amount of plasticizer contributed to the decreasing puncture resistance of MODEL A. This study proposes methods to combine sensory evaluation by humans and experimental data of the materials for the suture training model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Regina Fashion Supply Co., Ltd.

Department of Materials Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Akita University

Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. M. Furukawa, Journal of the Society of Rubber Science and Technology, Japan, 74, 167 (2001).
2. T. Tsuda, The Japanese Journal of Medical Instrumentation, 81, 21, 24 (2011).10.4286/jjmi.81.2 ↗
3. T. Shiga, K. Fujisaki, H. Komatsu, T. Maeno, K. Abe, J. Haruta, Y. Tochino, Y. Takemoto, K. Ishikawa, T. Shuto, Med. Educ., 50, 246 (2019).
4. M. Narushima, The Showa University of Journal of Medical Science., 26, 1(2014).10.15369/sujms.26.1 ↗
5. H. Egekvist, P. Bjerringa, L. Arendt-Nielsenb, Eur. J. Pain, 3, 42 (1999).10.1016/S1090-3801(99)90187-8 ↗
6. S. Tamai, Y. Hanada, K. Fujisaki, T. Ono, 2015 JSPE Autumn Conference Proceedings of JSPE Semestrial Meeting. 815 (2015).
7. R. Nishino, S. Aoyagi, M. Suzuki, A. Ueda, Y. Okumura, T. Takahashi, R. Hosomi, K. Fukunaga, D. Uta, T. Takazawa, T. Fujii, Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 32, 2, 351 (2020) .10.20965/jrm.2020.p0351 ↗
8. A. C. Gonçalves, S. Cavassana, F. R. Chavarette, R. Outa, J. Samuel, Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020, Article ID 8822686.10.1155/2020/8822686 ↗
9. H. Menge, S. Hotopf, U. Heuert, H. Schneider, Polymer, 41, 3019 (2000).10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00457-7 ↗
10. H. Iwabuki, Journal of the Society of Rubber Science and Technology, Japan, 87, 195 (2014).10.2324/gomu.87.195 ↗
11. K. Matsumoto, K. Nishi, K. Ando, M. Jikei, Polym.Chem., 6, 4763 (2015).10.1039/C5PY00599J ↗
12. S. Murayama, Tokyo, Japan, CMC Publishing Co., Ltd., 79 (2017).
13. G. A. Venegas-Cervera, A. I. Oliva, A. A. Ortega, J. M. Cervantes-Uc, J, Mater Sci.-Mater. M., 32, 104, 5 (2021).10.1007/s10856-021-06581-z ↗
14. Y. Xu, D. Chem, J. Mater. Sci., 53, 10585 (2018).
15. D. Lim, H. Park, J. Park, J. C. Knowles, M. Gong, Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers 28, 279 (2013).10.1177/0883911513484572 ↗