Effective Saccharification and Fermentation of Kraft Pulp to Produce Bioethanol
Source abstract
Abstract
Bioethanol was obtained from softwood bleached kraft pulp (NBKP), an intermediate product from industrial paper processes, by successive or simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Saccharification of NBKP was performed with several cellulases, revealing that Cellic CTec2 cellulase was the most effective at saccharification and resulted in yield of 76.3% after 72 h. Though X-ray measurements, it was noted that the crystallinity of NBKP decreased after alkali treatment with 9% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution for 10 min at 10̊C. Alkali-treatment also decreased the weight of NBKP by 5 wt%. This was hypothesized to be due to removal of dissolved hemicellulose and lignin. Short time saccharification of alkali-treated NBKP resulted in good yields of glucose production and the yields did not increase with longer saccharification times. Successive saccharification and fermentation of untreated and alkali-treated NBKP were conducted using Cellic CTec2 (at 1:10 ratio by wt with respect to NBKP) for 72 h and then addition of a recombinant yeast (pYBGA 1) to give ethanol in 91.3% and 93.3% yields under the optimum conditions of cellulase and yeast, respectively, based on saccharified glucose. In contrast, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation could not effectively produce ethanol from NBKP, regardless of alkali-treatment; this may because of low efficiency of the saccharification. Using other combinations of cellulases and yeast strains to produce ethanol, it was found that Sucrase C,Meicelase, and Sumizyme C were also effective cellulases for the saccharification of alkali-treated NBKP. Furthermore pYBGA 1 was more effective at fermentation than yeast strain Kyokai No. 7 (K 7). Under optimized conditions for cellulase and recombinant yeast, ethanol yields were 91.3 and 93.3% for untreated and alkali-treated NBKP, respectively; these results show that a combination of Cellic CTec2 and pYBGA 1 was the most effective for the process of successive saccharification and fermentation of NBKP.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biofuel production and bioconversion · Catalysis for Biomass Conversion · Lignin and Wood Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] C. E. Wyman, Ed, Handbook of bioethanol. Taylor & Francis, Washington DC (1996).
2. [2] C. Laluce, A. C. G. Schenberg, J. C. M. Gallardo, L. F.C. Coradello and S. R. Pombeiro-Sponchiado,“Advances and developments in strategies to improve strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and processes to obtain the lignocellulosic ethanola review”, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 166, 1908–1926 (2012).10.1007/s12010-012-9619-6 ↗
3. [3] D. Chiaramonti, M. Prussi, S. Ferrero, L. Oriani, P. Ottonello, P. Torre and F. Cherchi, “Review of pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic ethanol production, and development of an innovative method”, Biomass Bioener., 46, 25–35 (2012).10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.020 ↗
4. [4] T. Uryu, M. Sugie, S. Ishida, S. Konoma, H. Kato, K.Katsuraya, K. Okuyama, G. Borjihan, K. Iwashita and H. Iefuji, “Chemo-enzymatic production of fuel ethanol from cellilosic materials utilizing yeast expressing beta-glucosidases”,Appl. Biochem. Biotecnol., 135, 15–31 (2006).10.1385/ABAB:135:1:15 ↗
5. [5] X. Liang, T. Yoshida and T. Uryu, “Direct saccharification and ethanol fermentation of cello oligosaccharides with recombinant yeast”,Carbohydr. Polym., 91, 157–161 (2013).10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.056 ↗
6. [6] X. Zhao, X. Liang, S. Han, T. Uryu and T. Yoshida,“Successive saccharification and fermentation of cellulosic agricultural residues using a combination of cellulase and recombinant yeast”, Senʼi Gakkai-shi, 70, 191–196 (2014).10.2115/fiber.70.191 ↗
7. [7] V. Gehmayr and H. Sixta, “Pulp properties and their influence on enzymatic degradability”, Biomacromolecules, 13, 645–651 (2012).10.1021/bm201784u ↗
8. [8] H. Nonaka and R. Sakai, “Effect of beating on enzymatic saccharification of wood pulp”, J. Jpn. Inst. Energy, 92, 1187–1190 (2013).10.3775/jie.92.1187 ↗
9. [9] N. A. Bauer and W. R. Gibbons, “Saccharification versus simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Kraft pulp”, Int. j. Biol. Eng., 5, 48– 55 (2012).
10. [10] M. Monrroy, J. R. Garcia, R. T. Menconca, J. Baeza and J. Freer, “Kraft pulp of Eucalyptus globulus as a pretreatment for bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation”, J.Chil. Chem. Soc., 57, 1113–1117 (2012).10.4067/S0717-97072012000200012 ↗
11. [11] L. Kang, W. Wang and Y. Y. Lee, “Bioconversion of Kraft paper mill sludges to ethanol by SSF and SSCF”, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 161, 53–66 (2010).10.1007/s12010-009-8893-4 ↗
12. [12] K. Iwashita, K. Todoroki, H. Kimura, H. Shimoi and K. Ito, “The bglA gene of Aspergillus kawachii encodes both extracellular and cell wallbound glucosidases”, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.,62, 1938–1946 (1998).10.1271/bbb.62.1938 ↗
13. [13] K. Kamide, Y. Yasuda, T. Matsui, K. Okajima and T.Yamashita, “Structural change in alkali soluble cellulose solid during its dissolution into aqueous alkaline solution”, Cell. Chem. Tech., 24, 23–37 (1990).
14. [14] K. Kamide, K. Okajima and K. Kowsaka,“Disolution of natural cellulose into aqueous alkali solution Role of super-molecular structure of cellulose”, Polym. J., 24, 71–86 (1992).10.1295/polymj.24.71 ↗
15. [15] A. Sluiter, B. Hames, R. Ruiz, C. Scarlata, J.,Sluiter, D. Templeton and D. Crocker, “Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass”, Tech. Report National Renewable Energy, Laboratory, http://www.nrel.gov/biomass /pdfs/42618 (2011).
16. [16] H. Kawaguchi, K. Uematsu, C. Ogino, H. Teramura, S. Nakamura, Y. Tsuge, T. Hasunuma,K. Oinuma, N. Takaya and A. Kondo,“Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Kraft pulp by recombinant Eschericia coli for phenyllactic acid production”, Int. J. Agricl. Biol. Eng., 5, 48–55 (2012).
17. [17] N. A. Bauer and W. R. Gibbons, “Saccharification versus simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Kraft pulp”, Biochem. Eng. J., 88. 188–194 (2014).10.1016/j.bej.2014.04.014 ↗
18. [18] E. Hult, P. T. Larsson and T. Iversen, “A comparative CP/MAS 13C-NMR study of cellulose structure in spruce wood and Kraft pulp”,Cellulose, 7, 35–55 (2000).
19. [19] O. A. Wuorinen and A. Vianpaa, “X-ray diffractometric method for the determination of the crystallinity of cellulose”, Nerelco Report, 9, 48– 52 (1962).