EVA enhances the interfacial strength of EPS concrete: a molecular dynamics study
Source abstract
Abstract
Expanded polystyrene (EPS) concrete has high environmental and economic benefits. However, the difference in physical and chemical properties leads to a weak interface between EPS and concrete, which limits the use of EPS concrete. Based on the macro experiment of Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Copolymer (EVA) modified EPS concrete, two molecular dynamics interface models of EPS/C-S-H and EPS/EVA/C-S-H were constructed by molecular dynamics simulation, and their interface strengthening mechanism was discussed. The results of interfacial interaction analysis show that EVA increases the interfacial interaction energy and binding energy between EPS and C-S-H, and improves the adhesion between EPS and cement base. The results of radial distribution function analysis show that in the model with the modifier, there are not only Van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in the model without the modifier, but also strong interactions such as Ca - = O and OT - = O. The results of mechanical property analysis show that the elastic modulus of EPS concrete interface model after adding modifier is improved, and its interface properties are improved. The molecular dynamics simulation carried out in this paper shows that EVA acts as a bridge between EPS and C-S-H and enhances its interfacial properties. This study can provide basic theoretical support for the application of EPS concrete and reference for the development of high-performance composite cement-based materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology
Funding
Supported by the Innovative Funds Plan of Henan University of Technology · Chinese Natural Science Foundation · the Young-Backbone Teacher project of Henan Province
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Huang W, Miao X, Sun Y, et al. Study on the mechanical properties and damage constitutive model of hybrid fibre-reinforced EPS lightweight aggregate concrete. Teh Vjesn. 2020;27(6):1836–1843.
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.04910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.049 ↗
3. Li C, Miao L, You Q, et al. Experimental investigation on the bond behavior of deformed bars in a class of structural expanded polystyrene (EPS) concrete. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2020;24(1):1–13.
4. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.004 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.374-377.159810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.374-377.1598 ↗
6. Zhao X, Tian W, Jiang X, et al. Properties and microstructures of EPS lightweight concrete modified with EVA. J Build Mater. 2010;13(2):243–246.
7. 10.1007/BF0286149210.1007/BF02861492 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.01210.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.11.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2004.11.015 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.01410.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.014 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.05510.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.055 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12141810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121418 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.01.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.01.004 ↗
14. 10.1080/08927022.2016.115455010.1080/08927022.2016.1154550 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.06.02310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.06.023 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10589110.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105891 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.20010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.200 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11595-020-2275-810.1007/s11595-020-2275-8 ↗
19. 10.1524/zkri.1981.154.14.18910.1524/zkri.1981.154.14.189 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11919010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119190 ↗
21. Pan W, Gang Q, Yg B, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of the interfacial bonding properties between graphene oxide and calcium silicate hydrate. Constr Build Mater. 2020;260:119 927.
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12023210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120232 ↗
23. 10.3390/nano1011215810.3390/nano10112158 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11771-021-4582-410.1007/s11771-021-4582-4 ↗
25. Li Y, Peng Z, Fei W, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of miscibility evaluation of PS/PE-g-MAH and PS/PE. Eng Plast Appl. (Chinese). 2017;45(04):69–73.
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.06.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2010.06.005 ↗
27. 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20141015110.3866/PKU.WHXB201410151 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.02510.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.025 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10853-008-2704-010.1007/s10853-008-2704-0 ↗
30. Feng Y, Yu C, Hu K, et al. A study of the microscopic interaction mechanism of styrene–butadiene-styrene modified asphalt based on density functional theory. Mol Simulat. 2021;1–12.
31. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.05.08310.1016/j.jcis.2007.05.083 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.000011910.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.0000119 ↗
33. Liu F, Xiao H. Li. Adsorption behavior of poly(acrylic acid) on the surface of nanoparticulate titanium dioxide. Chem J Chinese U. 2005; 4:742–746.
34. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0005610.3389/fmats.2020.00056 ↗
35. 10.1109/ISEIM.2005.19338710.1109/ISEIM.2005.193387 ↗
36. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199812)36:17<3115::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199812)36:17<3115::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
37. 10.1080/00268976.2014.89303610.1080/00268976.2014.893036 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.369747710.1063/1.3697477 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11955710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119557 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12050010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120500 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12286210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122862 ↗
42. 10.1360/042004-6110.1360/042004-61 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.03010.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.030 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.02110.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.021 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.13810.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.138 ↗